George M. Middius wrote:

trotsky said:


trotsky, you are phony and disingenous. Your "company" has no
technical standards at all.
Indeed, you make a mockery of the high end.


Bob, you are getting slanderous here. If we need to take this to the
legal system, we can.


Those are clearly opinions.



In your opinion. Which you stated as fact.


Sorry, you lose. Whether a statement is an opinion or a fact is a
matter of fact, not opinion. It's a fact that Bobo's statements are
opinions. But if you truly disagree, why don't you explicitly tell
us which of his statements are not opinions. Here they are again:

1. trotsky, you are phony and disingenous.

2. Your "company" has no technical standards at all.

3. Indeed, you make a mockery of the high end.

Which one (or ones) are the non-opinions?


George, you're interesting, but only interesting in the way that peeling
off a painful scab is interesting. If the subject line of this thread
isn't slander, I don't know what is. But please, if you can tell us
more about your credentials as a lawyer, English teacher, or whatever,
please do.


Do you need to go on a marble hunt?


So you can find the rest of yours, you mean? You're on your own on that
one.


Here's another opinion: rao
isn't much of a high horse.


There's also another RAO regular who utters incomprehensible
nonsequiturs with alarming frequency. That is, we might be alarmed
if we didn't already know he's insane. What's your excuse?


I'm insane too. I'm in the audio biz, so that's by definition.


You lose.
Again.™


Lack of response noted.


To your plagiarizing weil's characteristic response? What am I supposed
to say? Somebody that has respect for the English language and that
condones plagiarism has some serious issues to sort through.


If you want my advice, you should tear into Bobo for the sugar
coating he gave the Krooger Problem.



And if you want my advice, you should tear into Bob for being too
gutless to show us his products--his screenplays.


What does that have to do with audio? You're the one who requested
comments from the group.


Oh, right, you're the on topic police. How could I have missed that?


Here's another suggestion: Cut short all the discussions about the
speakers themselves by saying you only wanted comments on the Web
site. After all, it's the market of audio consumers who will decide
if your speakers are what they want. Predictions and
prognostications of market performance are just another form of
thought experiment that the 'borgs worship, not much different from
their other predictions that your speakers will sound lame.


This last bit is well stated, but you have to know I only expected the
worst when I posted here. What other choices are there? As it is, I
got quite a bit of useful feedback from quite a few contributors, for
which I feel lucky. Now I'm just trying to mop the floor with the rest
of the turds, mostly just for old time's sake.