Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message nk.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... Thanks for admitting that we have it right and you guys can not prove that you hear what you claim and that much of what you believe about audio is more in the realm of mysticism. You miss the point. We don't believe in any need for proof. That much is obvious. Nor do we believe in mysticism. If you believe that people can hear differences from things like Shakti stones, then you do believe in mysticism. I don't know whether any particular people can hear differences with Shakti Stones. I don't know whetner any particular people do hear differences with Shakti Stones. All I care about is whether I hear any differences with Shakti Stones, and if so, are the differences worth the money, and if so, can I afford them. Three questions. If any one of the three answers is no, then I am not interested. Now, as to question 1) I don't know whether I would hear a difference. I never used Shakti Stones. Question 2) I assume that whatever differences I might possibly find, they are not worth the exhorbitant cost of the Shakti's, that I could get better results for less money investing in better equipment. Question 3) I probably could afford them, but there are scads of other things I would prefer to spend that money on. All we have are opinions. And all we need are opinions. What other people hear or don't hear isn't all that relevant, whether proven or not. It's whatever pleases us, for whatever reason, that matters. Who has said otherwise. Listen how you choose, to what you choose. If you make a claim of sonic difference due to something like Shakti Stones or some other device for which there is no possibility of an effect, you shouldn't be surpised or alarmed when people comment on the absurdity of it. That's fine, I don't care about you questioning Shakti Stones, ITs the insistence on your scienctific methodology as applied to consumer audio purchases. It's about enjoying the music, in whatever flavor or lack of flavor we like. This isn't science. Not the way some of the people here do it, that's for sure. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anyone know of a good handheld PDA style audio analyser/spl...etc meter? | Pro Audio | |||
Setup of "Bose style" double cube satellite speakers and sub in 5.1 config | Tech | |||
Raw Multi-Track -- What Style Of Music? | Pro Audio | |||
WTB- Old Style Sound Organisation stands | Marketplace | |||
"round" 80 wire IDE cables instead of ribbon style | Pro Audio |