Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Clyde Slick
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...


Thanks for admitting that we have it right and you guys can not prove
that you hear what you claim and that much of what you believe about
audio is more in the realm of mysticism.


You miss the point. We don't believe in any need for proof.


That much is obvious.

Nor do we
believe
in mysticism.


If you believe that people can hear differences from things like Shakti
stones, then you do believe in mysticism.


I don't know whether any particular people can hear differences with Shakti
Stones.
I don't know whetner any particular people do hear differences with Shakti
Stones.
All I care about is whether I hear any differences with Shakti Stones, and
if so,
are the differences worth the money, and if so, can I afford them.
Three questions. If any one of the three answers is no, then I am not
interested.
Now, as to question 1) I don't know whether I would hear a difference. I
never
used Shakti Stones. Question 2) I assume that whatever differences I might
possibly
find, they are not worth the exhorbitant cost of the Shakti's, that I could
get better results for less money investing in better equipment. Question 3)
I probably
could afford them, but there are scads of other things
I would prefer to spend that money on.






All we have are opinions. And all we need are opinions.
What other people hear or don't hear isn't all that relevant, whether
proven
or not. It's whatever pleases us, for whatever reason, that matters.


Who has said otherwise. Listen how you choose, to what you choose.
If you make a claim of sonic difference due to something like Shakti
Stones or some other device for which there is no possibility of an
effect, you shouldn't be surpised or alarmed when people comment on the
absurdity of it.


That's fine, I don't care about you questioning Shakti Stones, ITs the
insistence on your scienctific methodology as applied to consumer audio
purchases.



It's about enjoying the music, in whatever flavor or lack of flavor we
like.
This isn't science.


Not the way some of the people here do it, that's for sure.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone know of a good handheld PDA style audio analyser/spl...etc meter? Seth Mintz Pro Audio 3 October 21st 04 03:26 PM
Setup of "Bose style" double cube satellite speakers and sub in 5.1 config SteveQ Tech 9 June 22nd 04 07:46 AM
Raw Multi-Track -- What Style Of Music? eric Pro Audio 134 March 29th 04 06:00 AM
WTB- Old Style Sound Organisation stands CCSman Marketplace 0 November 27th 03 12:55 AM
"round" 80 wire IDE cables instead of ribbon style xy Pro Audio 17 August 18th 03 08:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:06 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"