Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to figure out how to setup the monitoring section of the little home studio I'm trying to build. I'd like to be able to record from 8 sources (for now) simultaneously and provide independent headphone mixes for the musicians. I only own part of the gear below, for now I'm just trying to understand what else I need to buy. This is what the signal chain would be like: mics and instruments -- preamps (those are probably going to be RME unless I find something used that's nicer) -- analog to ADAT converter (that's a Swissonic AD24) -- PC via RME HDSP 9652 (recording software is Nuendo 1.53) -- ADAT to analog converter (probably Behringer ADA8000) -- headphone amp (???) I would use an external effects unit as well as an external compressor (only one of each for starters) for the musicians mixes. I would use the Totalmix feature (http://www.rme-audio.com/english/tec...dsp_tmsoft.htm) of the HDSP 9652 to route different submixes to the individual physical outs. These outputs would then be converted to analog and sent to the headphone amp. The problem is that I don't know how I should include effects and compression with the headphone mixes. What kind of headphone amp should I get and how should I connect it to the fx unit and the compressor? Thanks |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andy" wrote in message
Hello everyone, I'm trying to figure out how to setup the monitoring section of the little home studio I'm trying to build. I'd like to be able to record from 8 sources (for now) simultaneously and provide independent headphone mixes for the musicians. I only own part of the gear below, for now I'm just trying to understand what else I need to buy. This is what the signal chain would be like: mics and instruments -- preamps (those are probably going to be RME unless I find something used that's nicer) -- analog to ADAT converter (that's a Swissonic AD24) -- PC via RME HDSP 9652 (recording software is Nuendo 1.53) -- ADAT to analog converter (probably Behringer ADA8000) -- headphone amp (???) I would use an external effects unit as well as an external compressor (only one of each for starters) for the musicians mixes. I would use the Totalmix feature (http://www.rme-audio.com/english/tec...dsp_tmsoft.htm) of the HDSP 9652 to route different submixes to the individual physical outs. These outputs would then be converted to analog and sent to the headphone amp. The problem is that I don't know how I should include effects and compression with the headphone mixes. What kind of headphone amp should I get and how should I connect it to the fx unit and the compressor? Situations like this is one reason why people like me still have been known to use consoles in their recording process. If you want zero latency multitrack monitoring (and everybody does!), the best way to do that can often be to do the monitoring before the signals get tangled up with the computer interface. I question the advisability of putting compression and EFX into the monitoring environment. I think musicans work best if they hear their work as clear and unvarnished as possible. OTOH, there's a difference between a musician hearing himself and a musician hearing things from other musicians, etc. If you're saying that you want the headphone mix for musician A to be composed of sound from musicians B, C & D with as much sweetening as possible, I can see where you;re coming from. However, I still think that what musician A hears of himself should be as accurate as reasonably possible. No matter, this is a lot of processing to burden a computer interface with. I think it still might be better done outboard, say in a digital console, or even an analog one. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arny Krueger" wrote If you want zero latency multitrack monitoring (and everybody does!), the best way to do that can often be to do the monitoring before the signals get tangled up with the computer interface. Hi Arny, thanks for your response. I never thought about doing the monitoring before the PC, although it's still not clear to me how that would work (with a patch bay maybe?). I think the RME HDSP 9652 is a very fast card (1.5 ms latency according to it's specs, almost zero) that can handle a lot more than 8 or even 16 simultaneous channels. Anyway, I think that if I wanted *zero* latency monitoring, the RME card would let me send the input signals directly to the outs with no delay. I question the advisability of putting compression and EFX into the monitoring environment. I think musicans work best if they hear their work as clear and unvarnished as possible. I agree with you Arny, I'm thinking that maybe some of the people I would work with(mostly musicians I play with and friends) would want me to change a little bit what they hear in the headphones, maybe they would like a little reverb or maybe some musicians are not used to the possibly increased dynamic range because usually when they perform with the band things sound kind of "compressed", maybe a singer won't hear the other instruments when she/he sings louder (I don't know if I'm saying something stupid here + forgive me for my English). Thanks again |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
?? Newbie Question for Sonar 2 users... | Pro Audio | |||
Tascam Portastudio question for a helpless newbie | Pro Audio | |||
newbie question - aardvark q10 + external mixer? | Pro Audio | |||
Newbie question: Any good resources on audio production? | Audio Opinions | |||
NEWBIE QUESTION: Need HELP With SOUNDCRAFT MIXER! | Pro Audio |