http://blogs.salon.com/0004478/2005/01/12.html

And if you look I think you'll find that you have tons more posts on OT
subject that I ever did. But regardless, you have won on the newsgroup, and
I have won because I can now say anything I want to say and it doesn't make
any difference whether you pay attention or not. But you'd better because
you never know when I'll lay out a Karl Rove type of smear campaign against
you! g

Don't worry Will. I'd never do that. But if you come onboard and answer
then I think it's free reign on riding you to the ground dude.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:39:15 +1300, "Geoff Wood"
wrote:


"Roger W. Norman" wrote in message
...
http://blogs.salon.com/0004478/2005/01/12.html

And if you look I think you'll find that you have tons more posts on OT
subject that I ever did. But regardless, you have won on the newsgroup,
and
I have won because I can now say anything I want to say and it doesn't
make
any difference whether you pay attention or not. But you'd better because
you never know when I'll lay out a Karl Rove type of smear campaign
against
you! g

Don't worry Will. I'd never do that. But if you come onboard and answer
then I think it's free reign on riding you to the ground dude.


I'm not going to get involved in another OT war with Will, and I'm not the
kind of guy who says "I told you so", but, I told you so. Over a year ago
I told you that I knew there were no WMDs. I guess you choose not to
believe that THEY also knew that, and the war and all those deaths were
based on a concious LIE. The sort of lie that is on the scale of
international war crime.

I hear that the Bush team is re-assigning the inspectors to search for
WMDs that may be hidden in the social security fund.

Al

playon wrote:

I hear that the Bush team is re-assigning the inspectors to search for
WMDs that may be hidden in the social security fund.

They should search the Enron execs, who seem to have inside knowledge of
Weapons of Monetary Destruction.

--
ha

"WillStG" wrote in message
oups.com...

And that this plan was working is inarguable, as evidenced by the
$23 Billion Saddam skimmmed off the UN "Oil For Food" program.

Will, Will, Will, I understand that the mediaverse is full of
misinformation, but you could at least try to find fact within it. The
following chart was prepared by Congress:

http://www.oilforfoodfacts.org/image...ions_Chart.pdf

The number is about 5 billion. All you say about the UN may or may not be
true, but the number is about 5 billion. 21 billion is the amount of money
Saddam managed to amass through various illegal means.

Anyway, the whole thing has always been, and remains, a cluster**** for
special interests and big money:

http://www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/i...&Affiliation=R

jb

Geoff Wood wrote:

I'm not going to get involved in another OT war with Will, and I'm not the
kind of guy who says "I told you so", but, I told you so. Over a year ago
I told you that I knew there were no WMDs. I guess you choose not to
believe that THEY also knew that, and the war and all those deaths were
based on a concious LIE. The sort of lie that is on the scale of
international war crime.


I haven't had any discourse with the Willmeister in quite some time, and
I feel really good about it.

He was very insulting to me, but I still wish him peace.

(KF still in effect.)

WillStG wrote:


So before you bitch another 40 times hee about Enron, or about
Halliburton, be sure you also bitch a few hundred times about what is
the largest scam and financial scandal in human history, the UN Oil For
Food Program.

You know, try to be "fair" and "balanced" Al.



How about if we ALL start bitching about ALL of them?

WillStG wrote:

Your lack of a coherent rationale for your position is noted.

Your unwillingness to admit being duped is noted.

As for WMD, Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT) made the following points
about the Dueffler report today.

Yeah, about like the admin's new position that the gargantuan trade
deficit (see today's info...) demonstrates the strength of the US
economy. Black is white, up is down, lies are truth. Them's your boys,
Will, and you're too blindered to see it.

You're still and bright and funny guy who knows a lot about audio.

--
ha

hank alrich wrote:
Your unwillingness to admit being duped is noted.

Tony Blair said people in his Party ask him, why Saddam Hussein? Why
not Mugabe? Why not all the Dictators ruling Africa, the world is
filled with evil rulers? And Prime Minister Blair said he answers them
"If we could we *should*, but because we can't, we don't."

I agree with the great liberal Mr. Blair. If I could, I would unseat
every Dictator in this world. And WMD was only one of three reasons
that were listed before the War for removing the Hussein's sadistic,
totalitarian regime, and the World will be a better place without him
or tyhe Baathist's in power.

You're still and bright and funny guy who knows a lot about audio.

Thank you Hank. Funny how you and I actually have much in common,
except for the messy business of politics.

WillStG wrote:

Funny how you and I actually have much in common,
except for the messy business of politics.

Well, I'm a really ****ty surfer...

--
ha

On 13 Jan 2005 11:39:55 -0800, "WillStG" wrote:


hank alrich wrote:
Your unwillingness to admit being duped is noted.

Tony Blair said people in his Party ask him, why Saddam Hussein? Why
not Mugabe? Why not all the Dictators ruling Africa, the world is
filled with evil rulers? And Prime Minister Blair said he answers them
"If we could we *should*, but because we can't, we don't."

Well isn't that a bull**** answer? Blair's credibility is shot on
this issue.


I agree with the great liberal Mr. Blair. If I could, I would unseat
every Dictator in this world.

No you wouldn't -- you would only cheerlead while other folks did the
dying for the cause.

Ak

Roger W. Norman wrote:
You might as well stop now, Will. As you've done in the past, you
presume
to present what I've said in the light you wish to view it.

Put it on my weblog and get it off RAP. It's what you demanded, now
get
yourself to a nunnery if you can't come up with a good reason to
continue
YOUR Bushistic diatribes here on RAP.

I've been nice to you so far. Do you dare to show your cyberface
around my
back yard? Even after you've demanded that I create that back yard?

Pussy.

Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

Actually I'm winding all this down, in fact I have responded to the
comments of several individuals on this and other threads privately.

And I "demanded" you create a weblog because I understand you well
enough to know that's what you really wanted Roger, you needed to do
that... Hey, who's looking out for you? g

But I do think you should at least attempt to do better than making
with the Bush hating, because the politics of hate are as much the
stuff of demogogues in America as in the Middle East.

Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Staff Audio / Fox News Channel / M-AES
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits

On 14 Jan 2005 17:47:53 -0800, "WillStG" wrote:

Actually I'm winding all this down

When?

Al

play on wrote:
On 14 Jan 2005 17:47:53 -0800, "WillStG" wrote:

Actually I'm winding all this down

When?

Al

Well I suppose if I have to wait until you have a clue Al, that
would take about forever.

Will

On 15 Jan 2005 08:10:53 -0800, "WillStG" wrote:

play on wrote:
On 14 Jan 2005 17:47:53 -0800, "WillStG" wrote:

Actually I'm winding all this down

When?

Al

Well I suppose if I have to wait until you have a clue Al, that
would take about forever.

It does seem to be taking forever, doesn't it. As usual with your
insults, I see. **** off Will.

Al

Roger W. Norman wrote:

Put it on my weblog and get it off RAP. It's what you demanded, now get
yourself to a nunnery if you can't come up with a good reason to continue
YOUR Bushistic diatribes here on RAP.

Good on ya, Roger; if there is real interest in discussion then surely
he will take it there.

--
ha

Alas, I've only posted one article and no one has bothered answering or
commenting, so maybe I just wasted $40 for a years worth of blog service,
but the point is that he's still here arguing and I'm not. I think that
does say it all. Then again, it's not all that much fun to go into a battle
of wits with an unarmed opponent! g

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"hank alrich" wrote in message
.. .
Roger W. Norman wrote:

Put it on my weblog and get it off RAP. It's what you demanded, now get
yourself to a nunnery if you can't come up with a good reason to
continue
YOUR Bushistic diatribes here on RAP.

Good on ya, Roger; if there is real interest in discussion then surely
he will take it there.

--
ha

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:06:39 -0500, "Roger W. Norman"
wrote:

Then again, it's not all that much fun to go into a battle
of wits with an unarmed opponent!

I thought that was happening *before* you got the blog..!

Al

Depends on whether you view me as the one being unarmed. I'm sure it's
debateable, but I don't see Wm. F. Buckley there, nor even WILL.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"play_on" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:06:39 -0500, "Roger W. Norman"
wrote:

Then again, it's not all that much fun to go into a battle
of wits with an unarmed opponent!

I thought that was happening *before* you got the blog..!

Al

"Roger W. Norman" wrote:

Alas, I've only posted one article and no one has bothered answering or
commenting


I did. I forgot to bookmark it though.

KF'ing Will has been the best thing I've done since Al Gore invented the internet.

"Roger W. Norman" wrote:

Depends on whether you view me as the one being unarmed. I'm sure it's
debateable, but I don't see Wm. F. Buckley there, nor even WILL.

As least Buckley has a brain.

I noticed, Don, but I haven't figured this whole weblog thing out yet, so if
I don't answer yet, just put it up to my father-in-law passing away and not
having a lot of time as my wife is the executor of the estate and we just
buried him on this Tuesday past.

I have, however, put up a couple of more articles you are welcome to look
at. Perhaps it's best to do the email thing if you want to communicate, or
at least until I have a grasp of what this weblog thing is all about.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Don Cooper" wrote in message
...


"Roger W. Norman" wrote:

Alas, I've only posted one article and no one has bothered answering or
commenting


I did. I forgot to bookmark it though.

KF'ing Will has been the best thing I've done since Al Gore invented the
internet.