Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 00:04:47 GMT, Marc Wielage
wrote: I used quite a bit of Scotch Classic tape in the early-to-mid-1970s, and corresponded with a 3M rep about some problems I had with it. Their tape slitting wasn't too consistent, and wreaked havoc with a Tandberg reel deck I was using at the time. snip Yes...Scotch of that era must've been slit with a broomstick with a bunch of razor blades stuck on it...you could watch it squirm and skew through the head stack, it was so bad! Dorsey complains about modern Quantegy's slitting...they've got NOTHING on Scotch back in those days! As I remember, Classic was a fairly high-bias tape, and the EQ was pretty much identical to 250, at least on the Technics and Revox decks I used in the 1980s. snip Similar, and smelled just about the same, too. Classic's big selling point (as a consumer reel tape) was that it came in a very spiffy black padded shipping container. Unfortunately, it also sold at a very high price. I had much better success -- and more consistency -- with TDK Audua and 3M 226/227. I haven't checked to see how any of those particular reels held up over the years, but I wouldn't doubt that they might have suffered from sticky-shed or stiction. God knows, the Ampex Grand Master stuff sure did. snip I'd lean in favor of 456 over Scotch 226 anyday. 226 was junk, and would start shedding brand new out of the box. At least I could get a few passes on 456 before it'd start to go south! dB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
on topic: we need a rec.audio.pro.ot newsgroup! | Pro Audio | |||
Question FAQ: rec.audio.* Recording 2/99 (part 7 of 13) | Pro Audio | |||
DNC Schedule of Events | Pro Audio |