Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Report Post  
Steven Sullivan
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chung wrote:
Nousaine wrote:


(---MIKE---) wrote:


I'm not convinced that automatic room equalization is useful. I
purchased a Rane 1/3 octave equalizer and spectrum analyzer. When I try
to "equalize" the room using the analyzer, the results are awful - much
too bright. This could be because my speakers (DBX Soundfield One) are
not adaptable to this type of measurement but I had to just try to
eliminate a few peaks and balance the bass. The end result was good.


---MIKE---


Many people forget that equalization for far field response is not "flat" but
needs the downsloping shape (1-1.5 dB per octave in rooms; 3 dB in cars.) The
reason for this is not at all intuitive but you can verify the need for
yourself by equalizing a speaker for flat response in the near field (or
anechoic) and then re-measurig the speaker in the far field. You'll see that
the flat near field response has a downslope in the far field.


The HK-AVR635 actually takes near-field and far-field measurements of
the front-stage (LCR) speakers into account when computing the proper
manipulations to the signals.
In addition, it also automatically
calculates delays and cross-overs for all the channels, based on
measurements of time-domain responses. The process it uses is much, much
more complex than taking a microphone and try to flatten out the
response with a 1/3 band equalizer. It actually uses a set of parametric
equalizers for all the channels. The reviews so far are very positive,
especially in how the center-channel is much more clearer, and in how
the low-frequency response of the room is smoother.


Unfortunately, since the 6-channel input signals are not digitized,
those advantages are not available in the 6-channel direct mode, which
one would use for listening to SACD or DVD-A.


Having great respect for Floyd Toole, and having heard great things about
this latest implementation of room compensation elsewhere, I'd love to
try the HK -- the deal killer for me, right now, is that it
doesn't have ilink, which would bring SACD and DVD-A into the DSP fold.
I'm really hoping they'll amend that in the next product cycle.



--

-S
If you're a nut and knock on enough doors, eventually someone will open one,
look at you and say, Messiah, we have waited for your arrival.
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 1/5) Ian D. Bjorhovde Car Audio 0 March 6th 04 06:54 AM
Denon Receiver Tone Defeat Question RobH Tech 0 November 8th 03 02:19 PM
Question regarding "tone defeat" button on Denon receiver RobH Audio Opinions 0 November 8th 03 01:51 PM
Denon vs Yamaha receiver Jason Wong Pro Audio 486 October 29th 03 12:41 PM
Denon vs Yamaha receiver Jason Wong Audio Opinions 514 October 29th 03 07:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:33 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"