Kurt Riemann = anencephalic retard


** That Moose VD has really ****ed his brain, something bad.





............ Phil

Kurt Riemann wrote in message
...
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:43:58 +1100, "Phil Allison"
wrote:


Kurt Riemann = STD suffering Moose Shagger
"Phil Allison"


"Larry Pohjola"
I am looking for decent (aka accurate)
pitch-recognition/frequency-recognition software for a research
project.
Don't need to alter or correct pitches, just an accurate
portrayal/record of the pitch frequencies, preferably numerical., but
graphic may be workable. Original source is an old (1960's) live
location tape. (no sticky-shed - hooray!) It's a research comparison
of theoretical and actual performance pitch in North Indian classical
music.
Any suggestions?


** Why not try low tech method ?

Get a musician to play along with the tape and tune their instrument to
match the pitch exactly.

Then measure their instrument with a tuning meter as sold in music
shops.




Try it sometime, Phil. It won't work because it's, um, a STUPID IDEA.
What would the experiment tell you? That indian tuning is non-Western?


** Hey Moose Shagger - you did not read the thread!!!


" ** The OP's surname and the nature of his project suggests that he
just
*might* know musicians of the needed persuasion - or indeed be one
himself. "

Which is why I mentioned "Indian tuning."

I said nothing about him not being able to perform the Stupid
Experiment. I said that you were an idiot. Read my other posts,
Filbert. It will explain very clearly why your idea was and remains a
STUPID IDEA.

It has a lot to do with the fact that you, Phil Allison, are not a
musician in the first place, and therefore have no basis for
conjecture in the area of musical performance.

He said "Performance Pitch" which to anyone with any experience would
understand to mean notes in complete relation to phrases. Your answer
was like recommending that someone studying accents buy children's
wooden letter blocks and look at the pretty words.

I'm curious if you have ever tried your low tech method to decipher a
16th note run and how you would be able to hear the beats in the third
note of the series if the note was 1 cent off? Just curious. Not that
this part of my post will make it into your reply or anything . . .

So to answer your question -

** Why not try low tech method ?

Indeed, Phil would be keen to impliment the low tech method. From reading
posts on aus.hi-fi and aus.electronics I gather Phil is a 'would be if only
he could be' toaster tech who fixes up or rather more correctly stuffs up
people's small kitchen applicances. One gets the impression he is stretched
to his technical limit diagnosing an open circuit in a power cord using a
continuity buzzer, let alone anything more complicated.

Phil also claims to be some sort of self proclaimed audio guru and hi-fi
expert. Apparently his claim to fame is he designed a small test audio
oscillator which is marketed as a kiddy DIY assembly kit for all of AUD
$22.95, now discounted to AUD $18.00 to get rid of them.
http://www.altronics.com.au/index.as...=item&id=K2544

Phil would lead you to believe it's a bonafide piece of test equipment for
hi-fi, but with the distortion at 0.16% it hardly specs past a junior high
school kid science project.



Here is why not try low tech method.. . . It's a waste of time and
will reveal NOTHING that the poster needs to know.

Exactly the impression I got when I asked the stupid fool a few simple
questions earlier in the thread. Instead of getting any answer I got a pile
of sarcastic questions and a torrent of abuse.






Kurt Riemann


Beats me why you guys put up with him.

Dean

Dean Usher wrote:



Beats me why you guys put up with him.



we wuz jest a-waitin' fer ya ta come along an' kick 'im out!

"Dean Usher"

** You are just a born, ****ing **** - Dean.

With that pathetic goatee beard and your penchant for new age masturbation
fantasies.

http://www.deanusher.com/

You are a gutless, know nothing prick and a vile usenet stooge.

Who is pulling your strings while you pull your tiny dick in public ??

People like you make me puke.




............... Phil

Kurt Riemann wrote in message
...
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:37:03 +1100, "Phil Allison"
wrote:

"Seeing as how you are not answering his question, Phil,


** Wrong and irrelevant anyhow.


Answering a question is now irrelevant? Thanks for the heads-up. That
would explain your very presence on usenet.

For the life of me, I couldn't find an answer to his question. I saw
some conjecture from you about having yet another musician ape the
original performance and the measure the new musician with a "music
shop" tuner, but I really didn't find anything resembling a real-world
answer in your ass-hat drivel.

I was able to spot the exact post where you hijacked the thread, and
where you started the insults and snipping, but I couldn't find an
answer. I also found yet another reference to bestiality (something
you bring up often) but I couldn't find your answer.

But I'm sure it will involve a frequency shifter, somehow.

Keep posting, at least we'll know you're not breeding.

Apparently there is no chance of that happenning. All the guys and gals at
aus.hi-fi, aus.electronics and aus.legal are convinced beyond any reasonable
doubt that Phil is allegedly having regular sexual relations with his blow
up doll. Some even refer to the said object as his 'Peter Walker' blow up
doll which brings a whole new perspective to the rumour.

...

...

http://groups.google.com.au/groups?q...com.au&rnum=14






Kurt Riemann

Dean

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:58:42 GMT, (hank alrich)
wrote:

Man, I admire your persistence and your style; but your task seems
somewhat like trying to blow smoke down a chimney.

Aw shucks. It's not ALL hard work. It can actually be a lot of fun
being Phil's RAP penpal..

You should read our Frequency Shifter exchange from October. He became
a complete sputtering mess, utterly unable do argue any point
whatsoever.

---------------------------------------------------------------

But I'm not doing it for myself.

Every time Phil goes unchallenged, a puppy dies.

We have to defend the puppies.





Kurt Riemann

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:58:44 GMT, (hank alrich)
wrote:

x-no archive: yes

Kurt Riemann wrote:

You mean "snipped?" Is the spittle clogging your keyboard?

Close. He types by pressing his nose against the inside of his navel and
bumping the keys with the stubby protuberance. It's a hit or miss
proposition.

Sadly, I can picture that.




Kurt Riemann

Kurt Riemann = anencephalic Moose Shagger from Alaska



His parents are so proud he is not a arse bandit like his brother.





.............. Phil

x-no archive: yes

Kurt Riemann wrote:

You should read our Frequency Shifter exchange from October.

I did read some of that mess; fascinating in a macbre sort of way.

He became a complete sputtering mess, utterly unable do argue any point
whatsoever.

No surprise there.

But I'm not doing it for myself.

Every time Phil goes unchallenged, a puppy dies.

We have to defend the puppies.

Trying to keep the forum from going to the dogs, eh?

--
ha

Phil Allison wrote:



http://www.deanusher.com/


Hey, I need my web site spruced up! Thanks for the link!

"S O'Neill"
Phil Allison wrote:



http://www.deanusher.com/


Hey, I need my web site spruced up! Thanks for the link!



** Lots a luck - dickhead.



.............. Phil

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:35:46 GMT, (hank alrich)
wrote:





Trying to keep the forum from going to the dogs, eh?

Too late. There's always been too much bitching in here.




Kurt Riemann