"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net

Where did I claim anything other than what I said the information was.
In order to have attacked you, it stands to reason that your name
would be included in the post. Very clearly he has not used your
name as many times as you have used his. It seems reasonable to
assume then, that you have had much more to say about him than he has
about you. Since nearly everything you say about Arny is negative,
it also stands to reason that you have attacked him far more than the
other way round.

Please don't try to confuse the Middius clique with the facts. They *know*
the truth, whatever George tells them it is today.

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net

Where did I claim anything other than what I said the information
was.
In order to have attacked you, it stands to reason that your name
would be included in the post. Very clearly he has not used your
name as many times as you have used his. It seems reasonable to
assume then, that you have had much more to say about him than he
has
about you. Since nearly everything you say about Arny is negative,
it also stands to reason that you have attacked him far more than
the
other way round.

Please don't try to confuse the Middius clique with the facts. They
*know*
the truth, whatever George tells them it is today.

And the proof for any of this nonsense is where, exactly?

McKelvy's statistics contain no facts, just numbers derived from data
dredging and selective searches that fail to account for how word
counts are really derived.