Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41   Report Post  
Doc
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"hank alrich" wrote in message
.. .
Doc wrote:

Yeah, Goulet recorded a lot of schlock and I've heard could be a horse's
ass, but he had a formidable vocal instrument.


He could not swing his way into a wet paper shopping bag.


Whether that's true or not, as a vocalist he was in a class Sinatra couldn't
even dream of aspiring to. As were any of the others I noted.

You seem
oblivious to the implications of phrasing.


The "implications" of phrasing? Holy inappropriate word usage Batman! I
assume you mean the technique of phrasing. Or simply "phrasing".

Having played lead trumpet in a number of big bands and having done some
arranging and songwriting, I'm reasonably familiar with concepts such as
swing, phrasing etc.

I've found that when people say "he's got great phrasing" it often means
their vocal chops are shot.

If you think Sinatra was great, knock yerself out and enjoy. I won't be
joining you in your adulation.


  #42   Report Post  
db
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yeah all that stuff about Crosby being a sadistic father kind of sealed
my opinion of him.
I Never liked his voice, even as a child. Face it, he was a
narcassistic asshole with a mediocre voice, and an incredible amount
of luck.

  #43   Report Post  
DeserTBoB
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:44:20 GMT, "Doc"
wrote:

His fellow Rat-Packer Sammy Davis had more singing talent in his glass eye
than Sinatra ever dreamed of. snip


Agreed.

Dunno about that but I think he was overrated as a singer. snip


Even Astaire said he couldn't sing!

Sorry, I've never gotten excited about Sinatra, even in his so-called prime.
Anything after about the mid 50's I find unlistenable. He was the most
slickly packaged singer of his era but far from the most talented. snip


Well, to be fair, his Dorsey days showed he COULD sell a song, as
witnessed by the mobs at the Brooklyn Paramount would attest, but by
'49 or so, he was more interested in screwing Ava Gardner than he was
in singing.

Ray
Eberle, Ed Ames, Dick Haymes, Dino, Billy Eckstine, Jack Jones, Sammy Davis,
Vaughn Monroe, the young Tony Bennett before his pipes turned to leather,
among others were all far better singers. snip


Dick Haymes was probably one of the most underrated male vocalists of
all time. Vaughn Monroe really held his own in the late '40s (he was
EVERYWHERE on radio) but there's only so much you can do with a
baritone in pop music...but a great set of pipes and a superior
talent.

As is always the case, I have no
doubt there were legions of unheralded coulda-beens that never garnered
great fame who were also better. Sinatra had at best a passable timbre
without much power when he was very young and when that was gone, he had
nothing left but mob connections, good marketing, hype and excellent bands
full of musicians he was mostly qualified to serve coffee to, to keep his
name alive. snip


Sinatra always had a weak voice...no power, limited range...Sammy
could sing rings around him in the rat pack days. What he DID have
was 1.) interpretive ability, which someone like a Vaughn Monroe
completely lacked, 2.) a very unusual timbre that emerged making his
voice, as weak as it was, instantly recognizable (as was Crosby's),
and as you said, 3.) Lucky Luciano and his pals. The Feebs under
Hoover tried desperately to indict Sinatra and amassed the biggest FBI
file ever kept on an entertainer http://foia.fbi.gov/sinatra.htm , but
Sinatra wisely had friends in very high places, like JFK and later,
Ronnie RayGun, himself a crook.

You have to look at Sinatra as an entire package, not just as a
vocalist. Public fascination with the mob, the glitter of Vegas and
his self-described "ring-a-ding" attitude all combined to offset his
vocal failings. I have to agree that anything he did after "Come Fly
With Me" in '57 was pretty marginal, altough I must admit I listen to
these albums probably more to hear the likes of Billy May, Nelson
Riddle (a genius with a score), Don Costa and others...those were some
SUPERB charts played by some SUPERB guys, and as well engineered as
any recordings ever have been...thus, propping Sinatra up all the
more.

Well, let me modify that. I do think he had talent as an actor. I enjoy him
far more in movies than as a singer. snip


Like I said, Sinatra was a total package...he could "sorta sing," but
it wasn't the vocal quality, it was the same interpretive abilities
probably brought about by his life's experience that made him a
powerful figure in the mind of the public. It was that same
experience that gave him such powerful credibility as an actor.

dB
  #45   Report Post  
DeserTBoB
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 18:10:20 GMT, "Paul Stamler"
wrote:

He recorded both, in 1949, and released them as a double-plug single on
Decca. See:

http://www.countryworks.com/artist_full.asp?KEY=TUBB


Wow, he re-released it in '49 and got a top 10 hit on both sides??
That's truly amazing, considering NO one knows anything about it
today, while Crosby groans out his '49 re-recording backed by John
Scott Trotter every year without fail.

I'd heard that Crosby's '49 redo of "White Christmas" was one of the
first singles cut on the experimental new Ampexe 200As that he'd
backed financially. How true this is, I have no clue, but Crosby's
backing of Ampex is common knowledge.

dB


  #46   Report Post  
DeserTBoB
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 13:01:46 GMT, "Doc"
wrote:

Not by the people who wrote his songs. Despite his having an untrained and
slightly "croaky" voice, they loved the way he delivered them. snip


Sinatra did have early vocal training, as a teenager. He wasn't a
very apt pupil, from all accounts, and a lot of what he was taught in
vocal classes seemed to be lost on him in later years.

The cynic in me strongly suspects their enthusiasm was largely due to the
fact that he was huge star and whatever he sang got tremendous publicity. snip


....thus providing the rationale for fakes like Enrique Iglesias,
Britney Spears and Ashlee Simpleton, the "Texas Jigger"...manufacture
a star with a lot of hype, and the lemmings will go over the cliff
into your cashbox every time.

Vaughn Monroe? Robert Goulet's godfather?


Thanks for reminding me of another singer I should have put on the list.
Yeah, Goulet recorded a lot of schlock and I've heard could be a horse's
ass, but he had a formidable vocal instrument. "If Ever I Would Leave You"
was a gem. Haven't heard him in a long time, don't know what kind of shape
his pipes are in these days. snip


Lousy. I heard him in Vegas not too long ago...his range is severely
truncated, he looks like a department store manniquin with all that
makeup, and his stage presence is NOT good. Years of booze and cigs
sure took their toll there, as they did with Sinatra and Bennett.
Even Waynie-the-Pooh over at the Stardust is more entertaining...in a
bizarre sort of way. As far as Vegas fare goes, Steve and Eydie (for
better or worse) can clean Goulet's clock anyday...if you can stand
Eydie's screaming at you for any length of time. The one who's
drawing them like flies in Vegas today? A nobody-cum-star named Steve
Gahns. I've yet to figure this out, other than it's the biggest hype
campaign in town I've ever seen.

I think your problem is that you don't like Sinatra as a person, and I

can't
blame you for that.


Well, honestly I just don't think much of his voice. I'd say "he was an
asshole but he could sing" if I believed that. I could listen to Sammy
Davis, Goulet or Ed Ames all day. You'd have to pay me to listen to Sinatra
for any length of time. Well, I might tolerate him to hear those fantastic
Nelson Riddle arrangements. Btw, I've always heard that Sinatra's career
stalled after parting ways with Riddle and picked up again when he started
using him again. snip


Riddle was 100% responsible for Sinatra's comeback starting in '54,
and Billy May's hot charts and wailing saxes propelled it even further
in the mid/late '50s. Sinatra and May had a parting of the ways,
Sinatra went back to Riddle, then started drifting around. Many of
his '60s and '70s albums were utter bombs without Riddle around to
prop him up, but sold anyway, due to the name Sinatra had manufactured
for himself. Gordy Jenkins and the LA Phil couldn't do much to help
him on the "Future" part of "Trilogy" in '79, and even the '60s Don
Costa-backed cover stuff was weak. Without a hot band to back him,
Sinatra would fall flat on his face, and the ballads, even with
Riddle, would be come booze-soaked laments, although I think that was
part of the attraction...people loved hearing that painful groaning!
To be fair, "Future" was a HUGE gamble for Sinatra, and a very
unconventional set of music for a pop vocalist. So, I give Sinatra
kudos for even trying it. It sold well in spite of itself. However,
he wisely backed himself with a big name in itself with the LA
Philharmonic, just to hedge his bet.

Recently saw a Sinatra movie that I'd never heard of before - "Kings Go
Forth" I think it was from '58. Sinatra, Tony Curtis, Natalie Wood.
Interesting movie that apparently never got much notice despite the big
names. The subject matter of interracial marriage I'm sure was highly
controversial at the time. Also featured a cameo by trumpet great Pete
Candoli who also provided the playing to Tony Curtis' faking. snip


The movie supposedly didn't play well in the South (hmmmm...those
pesky red states again!) and also angered many WW II and Korean War
vets, knowing that Sinatra had dodged the bullet in WW II and had a
pretty cushy life on the home front...sort of like our current
president! The prejudice angle had been played to the hilt a year
earlier in '57 with "Sayonara" and seemed to play universally well,
probably because it didn't involve a black player. Why anything
written by Michener didn't take 400 reels of film to document is
beyond me. I remember seeing "Kings Go Forth" and thinking the
screenplay was a bit weak, while Sinatra pretty much held the whole
thing together opposite a fresh and well directed Natalie Wood.
Curtis was...well...Curtis!

dB
  #47   Report Post  
DeserTBoB
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 29 Dec 2004 04:46:08 -0800, "db" wrote:

Yeah all that stuff about Crosby being a sadistic father kind of sealed
my opinion of him. snip


Revisionists (including his own family!) have tried to bury this
again, but the infamy continues.

I Never liked his voice, even as a child. Face it, he was a
narcassistic asshole with a mediocre voice, and an incredible amount
of luck. snip


I don't know...Crosby could be soothing at times, but one-dimensional.
It's been said more than once that the reasons that Bing Crosby and
Kate Smith made it at all was the fact that the timbres and strengths
of their voices could "punch through" on those horrid Western Electric
carbon mikes of the '30s, and thus would sound better on radio. Once
stardom on radio was achieved, record sales naturally followed, as did
major star status.

Kate Smith never had ANY education on ANYTHING musical in her life,
and couldn't read music. Everything she did was purely
instinctive...a true natural talent, in that she simply had tons of
energy behind her voice. As recording improved over the years, she
became more of an artifact of earlier days, but until the end, NO one
could belt out a song from the stage without reinforcement like Kate
Smith could...she was THAT LOUD!

dB
  #48   Report Post  
Doc
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"DeserTBoB" wrote in message
...

Excellent post, interesting background stuff.

The movie supposedly didn't play well in the South (hmmmm...those
pesky red states again!) and also angered many WW II and Korean War
vets, knowing that Sinatra had dodged the bullet in WW II and had a
pretty cushy life on the home front...sort of like our current
president!


Bob Hope apparently conned his way into avoiding a similar label with his
USO touring. His being "too old" was a somewhat weak excuse. I looked into
this a while back. If he had been just one year younger he would have been
legally required to register for the draft. He was a former boxer and avid
golfer, certainly seemed physically fit enough. If he had genuinely wanted
to pull some strings and get in, I imagine he could have. Jimmy Stewart who
was only about 4 years younger than Hope was labeled 4-F and told to hit the
road because of his weight, but said "screw that", gained weight and saw
combat as a bomber pilot. Accounts I've seen indicated he was an excellent
airman and officer. I imagine he was motivated by machismo as much as by
patriotism, not wanting to be remembered as having been too scrawny for
military duty. No doubt it didn't hurt his career in the long run to have
stepped up to the plate like that when he didn't have to.

The prejudice angle had been played to the hilt a year
earlier in '57 with "Sayonara" and seemed to play universally well,
probably because it didn't involve a black player.


Somewhat humorous that though it was about a white woman who had married a
black man, they managed to go through the whole flick without a black face
ever being shown.


  #49   Report Post  
Mike Rivers
 
Posts: n/a
Default


In article writes:

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 18:10:20 GMT, "Paul Stamler"
wrote:

He recorded both, in 1949, and released them as a double-plug single on
Decca. See:

http://www.countryworks.com/artist_full.asp?KEY=TUBB

Wow, he re-released it in '49 and got a top 10 hit on both sides??
That's truly amazing, considering NO one knows anything about it
today, while Crosby groans out his '49 re-recording backed by John
Scott Trotter every year without fail.



So maybe I really DID hear Ernest Tubb sing White Christmas. Guess I'm
not so feeble after all.

--
I'm really Mike Rivers )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
  #52   Report Post  
DeserTBoB
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 30 Dec 2004 13:09:37 -0500, (Mike Rivers)
wrote:

I'm even weaker on movies than I am on popular music. Did the movie
make another cycle around 1949 (perhaps prompting the re-release and
the Tubb recording)? I remember seeing the movie as a kid, but I was
born in 1943, so I know I didn't see the first release, but by 1949 I
would have been old enough to really watch a movie and at that age I
probably wouldn't have been bored with White Christmas. Today I would. snip


The movie for which the song was written in 1940 was "Holiday Inn," a
1942 Paramount vehicle designed for Crosby and Fred Astaire, both on
loan from MGM, because Arthur Freed at MGM hadn't the slightest idea
how to use them. Of course, after big hits at Paramount, Columbia and
RKO, Freed got over his cluelessness and brought them back to Culver
City. The hit, "White Christmas," wasn't even considered a hit by
either Berlin or Crosby, and the demand for a single was immediate. A
"sort-of" remake of Holiday Inn was released under the title "White
Christmas" in 1954, starring Crosby with Danny Kaye, Rosie Clooney and
Vera-Ellen. The plot was even more frothy, but Paramount decided that
the "White Christmas" franchise merited the first release done in
their new VistaVision wide screen format with the usual Technicolor
glitz provided by Natalie Kalmus, one of Hollywood's first female
industry big shots. Although the remake fell short of the plot line
of the original, and Bing was quite obviously much too old for the
part, it's been a perennial favorite ever since.

So, if the "White Christmas" you saw was black and white and had the
usual optical sound track, it was really "Holiday Inn." If it was in
wide screen Technicolor with a great Weco mono sound track, it was
"White Christmas."

dB
  #54   Report Post  
HiC
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Robin Chandler" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 21:34:04 GMT, "Doc"
wrote:

Have Yourself A Merry Christmas by the Pretenders. I don't know when this
was released but I just noticed it this year on our local station that's
playing holiday music 24/7 through Christmas. Good god, this chick

couldn't
hit a pitch with a truck, sounds like it was recorded in a karaoke bar.

It's
so bad it's hilarious.


She couldn't carry a tune if it was in a basket.
However, the worst holiday song has to be:

That miserable kid that sings " There's Something in the Chimney"
Bob Rivers I think?

I hate that Christmas Shoes song as well (ok it makes me tear up!!).

I like the religious songs but also like the Adam Sander song, (Goldie
Hawn is a fine looking Jew!!!, well at least she was)....

I have to wonder if Billy Gilmann is porking Charlotte Church.....?

Maybe that's why his xmas's are warm -n- fuzzy?

Nobody can sing White Xmas like Bing.
Nobody can sing The Xmas Song (Chestnuts) like Nat. (Karen Carpenter
close second)
Nobody can sing Frosty the Snowman like Durantee.
Karen Carpenter sings like a bird, she needed better material and more
food.
Amy Grant is sweet.
Andre Kostolonetz (sp?) is the Sleigh Ride king....
Why do James Taylor's songs all sound the same?
Brian Setzer plays in weird keys, but I like his stuff!!!

Whoever told Gloria Estefan she could sing?
Great band though!

Barbara Streisand?
I keep hearing "Sam ya made the pants too long"!!!

Barry Manilow?
That "Skate on a River Song" sounds just like another song he wrote
right down to the chord changes....Yuk....
I do like "Another New Years Eve" though, the live version circa
1977....
Manhattan Transfer?
Great vocals....Stay away from xmas though!
The production on their Xmas CD is so bad I have to dive for the
treble control so my teeth stay in my mouth.
The engineer must have spent 20 years listening to NS-10's and blew
his hearing out.
Awful....
Screw my awful spelling!
Time for another beer......................







  #55   Report Post  
HiC
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Robin Chandler" wrote in message
...

Whoever told Gloria Estefan she could sing?


Isn't that great at giving bj's either...

Great band though!


They agree with me...




  #59   Report Post  
DeserTBoB
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 22:08:38 GMT, "HiC"
wrote:

Actually I think she has a nice voice. Not my absolute favorite but on some
things she really shines. One of my complaints is that while she's done some
great tunes, she's also done a number of weaker tunes with these wandering,
scalar, painfully uninspired melodies. snip


Eh....J-Lo's got a bigger ass, though.

dB
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk xy Pro Audio 385 December 29th 04 12:00 AM
Artists cut out the record biz [email protected] Pro Audio 64 July 9th 04 10:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:25 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"