Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many years ago I built myself an audio "passive preamp". The I/O
switching section consisted of ten pairs of connectors and ten DPDT center off switches. Each connector was routed to the center "common" terminal of a switch, and all the "tops" and all the "bottoms" of the switches were wired together - forming two busses to which any input or output (or group of I/O) could be connected. Now I have too many things to connect, and several of them have s-video to be switched as well. So I'm looking for a bigger, more capable switcher. I see lots of passive NxN switchers, but it appears they only connect one input to one output at a time. That is no help in being able to connect (for instance) VCR out to DVD recorder in, and DVD recorder out to monitor in simultaneously. The word "matrix" in the name doesn't seem to improve on that limitation, but "routing matrix" seems to imply that one can create more than one connection at a time. Unfortunately, all the routing matrix switchers I've found are active and have four-digit $ prices. A price of thousands of dollars is out of the question, and even if it wasn't, I'd rather not add active devices between my audio components, several of which are DC-coupled. Plus you are still limited to dedicated inputs and dedicated outputs - you can't have a single cable going off to another room and use it for I or O as needed. And you can't have a single cable to a DV camcorder which swaps its single connector between input and output. Yes, I know, normal people use a home theater receiver. But if I'm suspicious of the effect a multi-thousand dollar pro switcher would have on my system, there is no way I'm going to inflict a mass-market receiver on myself. Is there really no such thing as a passive matrix switcher with multiple internal busses, that can make multiple independent connections among any of its I/O connectors? Or have I just not found the proper search term? Loren |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Loren Amelang" wrote ...
Is there really no such thing as a passive matrix switcher with multiple internal busses, that can make multiple independent connections among any of its I/O connectors? Or have I just not found the proper search term? The nature of video is such that routing a video source to a variable number of destinations is not possible the way it is in audio. Most modern audio sources are low-impedance voltage sources and audio destinations are relatively high- impedance sinks. This allows one to route an audio output to several destinations without appreciable loss or distruption. However, video signals have up to 5,000x more bandwidth than audio and need properly-matched source and load impedances to operate properly. A video routing switcher is actually a combination of a matrix switch and several distribution amplifier stages. Note that video matrix switch ICs (some even completely self- contained with output amps, etc.) are available from vendors like Maxim, etc. See a listing of them at... http://www.maxim-ic.com/solutions/cr...x.mvp?pl_pk=50 See particularly MAX453, MAX454, MAX455 (2x1, 4x1, and 8x1 buffered video multiplexers or the newer MAX4359, MAX4360, MAX4456 (4x4, 8x4, and 8x8 buffered video crosspoint switch circuits. Many of their ICs are available in an "Evaluation Kit" where the chip is already installed on a PC board with all the required peripheral components to make a working circuit. I have made myself a couple of video Distribution Amplifiers by using the Evaluation Kits with first-class performance and specifications at a cost far less than anything you could buy off the shelf. Of course I had to provide my own enclosure, connectors, power supply, etc. so likely not practical for everyone. Maxim not only makes cool ICs, but they also sell them direct online (at www.maxim-ic.com) and many of them are available at vendors like www.digikey.com, etc. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Loren Amelang" wrote ...
Is there really no such thing as a passive matrix switcher with multiple internal busses, that can make multiple independent connections among any of its I/O connectors? Or have I just not found the proper search term? The nature of video is such that routing a video source to a variable number of destinations is not possible the way it is in audio. Most modern audio sources are low-impedance voltage sources and audio destinations are relatively high- impedance sinks. This allows one to route an audio output to several destinations without appreciable loss or distruption. However, video signals have up to 5,000x more bandwidth than audio and need properly-matched source and load impedances to operate properly. A video routing switcher is actually a combination of a matrix switch and several distribution amplifier stages. Note that video matrix switch ICs (some even completely self- contained with output amps, etc.) are available from vendors like Maxim, etc. See a listing of them at... http://www.maxim-ic.com/solutions/cr...x.mvp?pl_pk=50 See particularly MAX453, MAX454, MAX455 (2x1, 4x1, and 8x1 buffered video multiplexers or the newer MAX4359, MAX4360, MAX4456 (4x4, 8x4, and 8x8 buffered video crosspoint switch circuits. Many of their ICs are available in an "Evaluation Kit" where the chip is already installed on a PC board with all the required peripheral components to make a working circuit. I have made myself a couple of video Distribution Amplifiers by using the Evaluation Kits with first-class performance and specifications at a cost far less than anything you could buy off the shelf. Of course I had to provide my own enclosure, connectors, power supply, etc. so likely not practical for everyone. Maxim not only makes cool ICs, but they also sell them direct online (at www.maxim-ic.com) and many of them are available at vendors like www.digikey.com, etc. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Waiving the right to remain silent, Loren Amelang
said: Is there really no such thing as a passive matrix switcher with multiple internal busses, that can make multiple independent connections among any of its I/O connectors? Or have I just not found the proper search term? Videonics (if they are still in business) made these. I owned one which was composite video with stereo audio. They upgraded it to S- Video at some later time. It was 4x4 and NOT passive. You cannot do that with video. -- Larry Jandro - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail Are you a Sound/Video/Lighting/Staging Freelancer..? If so, think about joining our mail list. Send an e-mail to: (Requests from Yahoo & Hotmail will be rejected.) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Waiving the right to remain silent, Loren Amelang
said: Is there really no such thing as a passive matrix switcher with multiple internal busses, that can make multiple independent connections among any of its I/O connectors? Or have I just not found the proper search term? Videonics (if they are still in business) made these. I owned one which was composite video with stereo audio. They upgraded it to S- Video at some later time. It was 4x4 and NOT passive. You cannot do that with video. -- Larry Jandro - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail Are you a Sound/Video/Lighting/Staging Freelancer..? If so, think about joining our mail list. Send an e-mail to: (Requests from Yahoo & Hotmail will be rejected.) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Loren Amelang wrote:
Is there really no such thing as a passive matrix switcher with multiple internal busses, that can make multiple independent connections among any of its I/O connectors? Or have I just not found the proper search term? You want a patchbay, with a couple rows set aside for mults. Yes, maybe someone out there makes a matrix switcher that lets you double-up, but there's just something very safe-feeling about a patchbay. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Loren Amelang wrote:
Is there really no such thing as a passive matrix switcher with multiple internal busses, that can make multiple independent connections among any of its I/O connectors? Or have I just not found the proper search term? You want a patchbay, with a couple rows set aside for mults. Yes, maybe someone out there makes a matrix switcher that lets you double-up, but there's just something very safe-feeling about a patchbay. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 14:12:40 -0800, "Richard Crowley"
wrote: "Loren Amelang" wrote ... Is there really no such thing as a passive matrix switcher with multiple internal busses, that can make multiple independent connections among any of its I/O connectors? Or have I just not found the proper search term? The nature of video is such that routing a video source to a variable number of destinations is not possible the way it is in audio. Most modern audio sources are low-impedance voltage sources and audio destinations are relatively high- impedance sinks. This allows one to route an audio output to several destinations without appreciable loss or distruption. Understood. While I have occasionally connected a single source to two destinations simultaneously with not totally disastrous results, my main goal is to be able to make two (or more) simultaneous connections between single sources and single destinations. The equivalent of the "tape-monitor" loop in a receiver, for instance. However, video signals have up to 5,000x more bandwidth than audio and need properly-matched source and load impedances to operate properly. A video routing switcher is actually a combination of a matrix switch and several distribution amplifier stages. Is that necessary if you are only connecting a single destination to any one source? Assuming they are compatible when connected directly, of course? Note that video matrix switch ICs (some even completely self- contained with output amps, etc.) are available from vendors like Maxim, etc. See a listing of them at... http://www.maxim-ic.com/solutions/cr...x.mvp?pl_pk=50 See particularly MAX453, MAX454, MAX455 (2x1, 4x1, and 8x1 buffered video multiplexers or the newer MAX4359, MAX4360, MAX4456 (4x4, 8x4, and 8x8 buffered video crosspoint switch circuits. Interesting! I've used several Maxim chips in other projects, and somehow I had a feeling I would end up building my own switcher. Thanks! Maybe "crosspoint switch" is the search term I was looking for? Loren |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Loren Amelang" wrote ...
"Richard Crowley" wrote: "Loren Amelang" wrote ... Is there really no such thing as a passive matrix switcher with multiple internal busses, that can make multiple independent connections among any of its I/O connectors? Or have I just not found the proper search term? The nature of video is such that routing a video source to a variable number of destinations is not possible the way it is in audio. Most modern audio sources are low-impedance voltage sources and audio destinations are relatively high- impedance sinks. This allows one to route an audio output to several destinations without appreciable loss or distruption. Understood. While I have occasionally connected a single source to two destinations simultaneously with not totally disastrous results, Professional/industrial video equipment usually has high-impedance inputs with two connectors so that you can "loop-through" the video signal to additional inputs. Then you put a 75-ohm termination at the end of the line. But few (if any?) consumer devices have loop-through inputs. Connecting a standard 75-ohm ouput to more than one 75-ohm terminated inputs will significantly degrade the signal, even reducing the amplitude of the sync portion to the point where some equipment won't be able to lock to it. NOT RECOMMENDED! my main goal is to be able to make two (or more) simultaneous connections between single sources and single destinations. The equivalent of the "tape-monitor" loop in a receiver, for instance. In that case, Scott's suggestion of a patch bay may be more like what you are looking for. I was assuming you were actually needing an any-to-any solution which would call for a non- blocking matrix. However, video signals have up to 5,000x more bandwidth than audio and need properly-matched source and load impedances to operate properly. A video routing switcher is actually a combination of a matrix switch and several distribution amplifier stages. Is that necessary if you are only connecting a single destination to any one source? Assuming they are compatible when connected directly, of course? Yes. A properly driven and terminated transmission line is required for high-quality transport of any high-frequency signal like video. |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() In article writes: Understood. While I have occasionally connected a single source to two destinations simultaneously with not totally disastrous results, my main goal is to be able to make two (or more) simultaneous connections between single sources and single destinations. The equivalent of the "tape-monitor" loop in a receiver, for instance. Radio Shack has had a few variations on that. I have one right here in my office so I can listen to the radio, or play audio from either of the two computers, or record from the radio or an external source to either (or both) of the computers. It's all unbalanced on RCA jacks, but it's two channels (stereo). It's model 42-2115, but unfortunately it or an equivalent no longer exists at Radio Shack. I'll bet you could find one on eBay, though. In fact I just did: http://tinyurl.com/7xbuu or in plain English, Item 5736072044 Thank the seller for his honesty (he says he found it in his basement and doesn't have any idea what it is or what to do with it), that $9.95 is too much, and he's an asshole for charging a flat $8 for shipping (it weighs much less than a pound). He doesn't have any bids and it closes in 3 days. Offer him $5 plus actual US postage. Live it up. Have him send it Priority Mail. Gotta get tough with those know-nothing eBay opportunists. Afterthought, aftersearch. Here's a better deal (also from an apparent know-knot) Item number: 5735939498 Buy it now for $8.99, flat $5 shipping. Almost not worth arguing about if it's what you want. Read the owner's manual here (sort of - text without pictures): http://support.radioshack.com/suppor...oc63/63395.pdf or, in Spanish, with illustrations: http://support.radioshack.com/suppor.../doc9/9194.pdf -- I'm really Mike Rivers ) However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over, lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Rivers" wrote ...
Radio Shack has had a few variations on that. I have one right here in my office so I can listen to the radio, or play audio from either of the two computers, or record from the radio or an external source to either (or both) of the computers. It's all unbalanced on RCA jacks, but it's two channels (stereo). It's model 42-2115, but unfortunately it or an equivalent no longer exists at Radio Shack. That would be a great suggestion if he were looking for audio- only. But I understood that he was asking for audio & video. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Richard Crowley wrote: "Mike Rivers" wrote ... Radio Shack has had a few variations on that. I have one right here in my office so I can listen to the radio, or play audio from either of the two computers, or record from the radio or an external source to either (or both) of the computers. It's all unbalanced on RCA jacks, but it's two channels (stereo). It's model 42-2115, but unfortunately it or an equivalent no longer exists at Radio Shack. That would be a great suggestion if he were looking for audio- only. But I understood that he was asking for audio & video. I was also assuming audio-online. If he wants audio and video both, there is no way to do it without either a DA or a nightmare of termination rules and loopthroughs. A patchbay (with a DA for the video and mults for the audio) still seems the solution to me. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Dec 2004 17:11:44 -0500, (Mike Rivers) wrote:
In article writes: Understood. While I have occasionally connected a single source to two destinations simultaneously with not totally disastrous results, my main goal is to be able to make two (or more) simultaneous connections between single sources and single destinations. The equivalent of the "tape-monitor" loop in a receiver, for instance. Radio Shack has had a few variations on that. I have one right here in my office so I can listen to the radio, or play audio from either of the two computers, or record from the radio or an external source to either (or both) of the computers. It's all unbalanced on RCA jacks, but it's two channels (stereo). It's model 42-2115, but unfortunately it or an equivalent no longer exists at Radio Shack. I'll bet you could find one on eBay, though. Thanks! Looks like a handy gadget to have around. Not sure I'll be using it with my serious audio system, though... Have to look inside first, at least. Loren |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Found a definition of "matrix switcher":
http://www.extron.com/product/prodtype03.asp "Matrix switchers route multiple audio/video sources to multiple audio/video destinations. Matrix switchers provide the ability to route any input to any output - or multiple outputs - at any time." I guess they mean a _buffered_ matrix switcher can route one input to multiple outputs. It looks like the key to my terminology question is that when a switcher offers more than "n by 1" switching, it can specify the number of available crosspoints. As in: "Kramer VS-44AV 4x4 (4 Crosspoint) Mechanical CV / Audio Matrix, 220 MHz" http://www.kramerelectronics.com/indexes/desc.asp?p=VS-44AV "The Kramer VS-44AV is a high quality mechanical 4x1x4 switcher for composite video and stereo audio signals. It is designed to route up to four sources to any one of four available outputs simultaneously. The VS-44AV is unique in allowing four different cross points of video and stereo audio to operate at the same time. However, it is important to note that it cannot distribute an input signal to multiple outputs simultaneously." I assume the limitation on "an input signal to multiple outputs simultaneously" is because it isn't buffered. I'm still not clear what the "4x1x4" terminology means. It sounds like a combination of a 4x1 input switch and a 1x4 output switch, but that would only allow four simultaneous crosspoints if they were all in the same row or column. I want to be able to put four simultaneous crosspoints in a diagonal or random pattern. So maybe this still doesn't do what I imagined. They don't make a passive counterpart for S-Video, anyway. Another useful search term is "loop back" (as in the "tape-monitor" facility of a receiver). http://www.extron.com/technology/faq.asp "Video loop back is a feature of Extron system switchers that allows selected inputs to be looped out of the system switcher to a scaler or scan converter and then looped back into the System. The result is the switcher and the scaler or scan converter essentially operate as one unit." That would solve one of my problems, but I really want to be able to switch any appropriate piece of equipment into the loopback position. That patchbay is sounding better all the time. Especially since I can't always use "audio follows video" switching. Sometimes the audio goes to or through additional equipment. Loren |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rivers" wrote in message news:znr1102369850k@trad... In article writes: Radio Shack model 42-2115 Thanks! Looks like a handy gadget to have around. Not sure I'll be using it with my serious audio system, though... Have to look inside first, at least. You know what they say about laws and sausages - If you like them, you'd better not watch either being made. Just cheap switches and some resistors. Are you describing the laws or the rat-shack switch boxes? :-) |