Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Last night my wife and I attended a concert of The Persuasions at the
Beckman Auditorium at Cal Tech in Pasadena. The sound was horrid. Basically, the sound reinforcement level was set so high that whenever the vocalists hit a crescendo, it sounded like the system was clipping. The sound was pretty good at moderate levels, but on the peaks it was really bad. Also, although we were seated front-center of the balcony, most of the sound appeared to be coming from the right side speaker. In speaking to the sound tech, he assured me that the system was not clipping. I asked why it sounded so bad. He first babbled about a "comb filter" that could make the sound appear to come from different directions in different places in the room. (What is he talking about?)I told him I know that reverse phasing on one of the speakers could cause the sound to wander, and he acknowledged that was possible. At this point another member of the audience seated nearby commented to me, "I don't understand what you are saying, but I agree with you (the sound is terrible). The tech then said that well the Beckman is really a lecture hall, not a musical performance hall. That makes some sense, but it still sounded good at moderate levels so I think the system was just turned up too darn high and unbalanced to the right. I gave up taking with the tech shortly thereafter and returned to my seat. The sound appeared to improve a little after my discussion with the tech, but still seemed to clip occasionally. He did get it centered better also. There were probably 600 in the audience and four on the stage (one of the normal five out sick), and I felt that the tech did a gross disservice to all of those persons. Any comments or advice? I intent to write a letter to the manager of the Beckman, but want to consult the "Pros" and be sure to get my technical facts straight first. Thanks for any advice, -Harry |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry wrote:
Basically, the sound reinforcement level was set so high that whenever the vocalists hit a crescendo, it sounded like the system was clipping. The sound was pretty good at moderate levels, but on the peaks it was really bad. Also, although we were seated front-center of the balcony, most of the sound appeared to be coming from the right side speaker. Clipping is bad, but you should know that a lot of techs basically judge how loud a system is by how it's distorting, and they will bring levels up until it clips on peaks and leave it there. This may be subconscious, but I have seen it lots of time. All the sound coming from the right side speaker is probably typical. In most of these halls, you can't get stereo imaging and the only real solution is to run the house mono. You may also have been hearing some fills. In speaking to the sound tech, he assured me that the system was not clipping. I asked why it sounded so bad. He first babbled about a "comb filter" that could make the sound appear to come from different directions in different places in the room. (What is he talking about?)I told him I know that reverse phasing on one of the speakers could cause the sound to wander, and he acknowledged that was possible. He's talking about the fact that you're hearing a lot of reflections from different places, and that a lot of the sound you're hearing is not direct sound from the speakers. Comb filtering is a side-effect of this, caused by frequencies that are emphasized and de-emphasized when signals coming from different directions sum together, and it's the reason that the frequency response in the room changes radically when you move from one seat to another. None of this is in any way related to clipping. At this point another member of the audience seated nearby commented to me, "I don't understand what you are saying, but I agree with you (the sound is terrible). That's also typical for concerts these days, yes. The tech then said that well the Beckman is really a lecture hall, not a musical performance hall. That makes some sense, but it still sounded good at moderate levels so I think the system was just turned up too darn high and unbalanced to the right. Everything is turned up too high, often because the audience demands it today. If the room is intended as a lecture hall, it will tend to have too long a reverb time for amplified music. Rooms that are a bit live, especially in the 1KC-3KC region, help speech to carry without amplification. This can make amplified music a little smeary. To some extent this can be helped with delayed fill speakers, which allow listeners to get more direct sound from the PA and less sound from the room into their ears. I gave up taking with the tech shortly thereafter and returned to my seat. The sound appeared to improve a little after my discussion with the tech, but still seemed to clip occasionally. He did get it centered better also. There were probably 600 in the audience and four on the stage (one of the normal five out sick), and I felt that the tech did a gross disservice to all of those persons. Yes, but remember he is probably being paid less than the bus driver is. Concert sound is not exactly a lucrative position these days, and it is difficult to get people who actually know and care about sound to work these gigs. Hell, the _band_ gets paid less on some of thes things than I'd charge to work them, and I am by no means a first-league PA guy. Any comments or advice? I intent to write a letter to the manager of the Beckman, but want to consult the "Pros" and be sure to get my technical facts straight first. Don't worry about the technical facts. Just say that it sounded bad and that it was too loud. You don't mention it, but I bet you a nickel that the kick drum was louder than the vocals, right? That's very fashionable today. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Harry" wrote:
Last night my wife and I attended a concert of The Persuasions at the Beckman Auditorium at Cal Tech in Pasadena. The sound was horrid. snip Basically, the sound reinforcement level was set so high that whenever the vocalists hit a crescendo, it sounded like the system was clipping. snip At this point another member of the audience seated nearby commented to me, "I don't understand what you are saying, but I agree with you (the sound is terrible). snip sounded good at moderate levels so I think the system was just turned up too darn high and unbalanced to the right. snip Any comments or advice? I intent to write a letter to the manager of the Beckman, but want to consult the "Pros" and be sure to get my technical facts straight first. You need to complain. We need audience members to complain in writing about excessive sound levels and bad overall sound when they occur. Bias alert: this is one of my pet peeves. In my opinion: The room doesn't need SR to 110dB SPL. Drums don't need SR in small venues. Never. Many older audience members are actually driven out of the room or turn their hearing aids off to avoid unpleasantness. Anecdote: one night we (the student sound crew & I) actually had audience members stop by and comment on the high quality of sound for the choral groups that evening. The young fellow running the board (I ran the recordings) admitted to me he forgot to bring up the choral mic faders during the show. They only had the reinforcement of the choral shell. I told him he made the right SR choice for that evening. It's supposed to be sound REINFORCEMENT not sound BLAST 'EM OUT OF THE ROOM! bobs Bob Smith BS Studios we organize chaos http://www.bsstudios.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree with Scott, it's hard to find competent people to run a complex system.
I did a few years of SR after I got out of recording college and worked with some real hum dingers. But, I bit my lip and did what I was told so as to get my paycheck. The worst one (shall remain nameless) was when the co-owner of the company set the monitors the way he liked them and when someone (of great importance) came on stage to the tune of feedback and ringing stage monitors. I felt really bad for all the people who had to take that stage that day. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't worry about the technical facts. Just say that it sounded bad
and that it was too loud. You don't mention it, but I bet you a nickel that the kick drum was louder than the vocals, right? That's very fashionable today. I Though the Persuasions were a legendary A Cappella group? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Dorsey" Newsgroups: rec.audio.pro Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 12:49 PM Subject: Sound Reinforcement Problem at Cal Tech's Beckman Auditorium |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You need to complain. We need audience members to complain in writing about
excessive sound levels and bad overall sound when they occur. I agree completely. ..In my opinion: The room doesn't need SR to 110dB SPL. Drums don't need SR in small venues. Never. Many older audience members are actually driven out of the room or turn their hearing aids off to avoid unpleasantness. IMO..if the bass player has an amp..the drums should be in the system. Often I hear mixes that are very loud and blaring yet you can't hear half the instruments. This is due to an unbalanced system ..IMO. Solid low frequency reinforcement is not unpleasant and will not sound that way to even hearing impaired listeners. The problem is that most mixers don't realize that a balanced mix..what we are used to hearing on normal home stereos, car stereos, home theater..is very heavy in sub and low frequencies and not so much in mid/high frequences. Also, ALL the sound is coming from the speakers and not all over the room at diffeernt arrival times so to sound "familiar" this must be done as much as possible in a live mix. I do a lot of smaller club mixing and all the instruments being in the system is necessary to approach hifi sound for all listeners. Don't get me wrong..I am easily offended by blaring, peircing mixes..not what I am talking about. I will be writing a series of columns on my ideas on redefining club sound in the enar future and a lot of it is dealing with system/room balance and mix techniques that I have found to work VERY well in small rooms. John A. Chiara SOS Recording Studio Live Sound Inc. Albany, NY www.sosrecording.net 518-449-1637 |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just curios, what would be the result if the OSHA inspectors were informed
of the excessive levels, and staff failing to wear ear plugs? Rgds: Eric |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
All the sound coming from the right side speaker is probably typical. In
most of these halls, you can't get stereo imaging and the only real solution is to run the house mono. There's no reason most live music shouldn't be mixed in mono, but it IS possible to achieve discernable left/right separation anywhere within the direct field, even to the right of the house right stack or left of the house left stack. In speaking to the sound tech, he assured me that the system was not clipping. I asked why it sounded so bad. He first babbled about a "comb filter" that could make the sound appear to come from different directions in different places in the room. (What is he talking about?) He's trying to come up with any explanation other than the correct one, which is that he did a lame mix job. He's talking about the fact that you're hearing a lot of reflections from different places, and that a lot of the sound you're hearing is not direct sound from the speakers. Comb filtering is a side-effect of this, caused by frequencies that are emphasized and de-emphasized when signals coming from different directions sum together, and it's the reason that the frequency response in the room changes radically when you move from one seat to another. Beckman, IIRC, is a circular structure, so obviously there isn't a snowball's chance in hell of getting good acoustical response in there, amplified or not. Scott Fraser |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Eric K. Weber" wrote in message
... Just curios, what would be the result if the OSHA inspectors were informed of the excessive levels, and staff failing to wear ear plugs? I imagine the result would be nothing whatsoever, without credible documentation of the levels. "It was loud" does not constitute credible documentation. "My SPL meter said 102dBA average for at least 85% of the two-hour show" might be enough to get someone to go take a look - at least, if there were regular complaints about the venue. The OSHA limits are aimed at situations like factory floors with shrieking metal lathes and huge stamping presses, pounding away 8 hours a day. Not saying that's how it should be, but I think that's how it is. |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric K. Weber wrote:
Just curios, what would be the result if the OSHA inspectors were informed of the excessive levels, and staff failing to wear ear plugs? I have never had any luck going this route, but I think the more people that do, the more OSHA is apt to actually start looking into it. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walter Harley wrote:
"Eric K. Weber" wrote in message ... Just curios, what would be the result if the OSHA inspectors were informed of the excessive levels, and staff failing to wear ear plugs? I imagine the result would be nothing whatsoever, without credible documentation of the levels. "It was loud" does not constitute credible documentation. "My SPL meter said 102dBA average for at least 85% of the two-hour show" might be enough to get someone to go take a look - at least, if there were regular complaints about the venue. How about "there is structural damage being done to the building frame by the sound reinforcement system, and patrons are being hospitalized with pneumothorax?" The OSHA limits are aimed at situations like factory floors with shrieking metal lathes and huge stamping presses, pounding away 8 hours a day. Not saying that's how it should be, but I think that's how it is. The OSHA limits are flexible and based on exposure time. You can listen to one level for a few minutes a day, and another level for an hour a day, and another level all day long. With the nifty modern noise dosimeters, they could be made far more flexible, though. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds like excuses to me on why he's done a crappy mix job. The Beckman is
a disaster of a room for many reasons... Even in bad rooms, though, it should be possible to get decent sound. It will never be fantastic, but decent should be attainable. The first thing in a bad room, though- especially with the reflections that the Beckman has- is to turn the system down. --Ben -- Benjamin Maas Fifth Circle Audio Los Angeles, CA http://www.fifthcircle.com Please remove "Nospam" from address for replies "Harry" wrote in message ... Last night my wife and I attended a concert of The Persuasions at the Beckman Auditorium at Cal Tech in Pasadena. The sound was horrid. Basically, the sound reinforcement level was set so high that whenever the vocalists hit a crescendo, it sounded like the system was clipping. The sound was pretty good at moderate levels, but on the peaks it was really bad. Also, although we were seated front-center of the balcony, most of the sound appeared to be coming from the right side speaker. In speaking to the sound tech, he assured me that the system was not clipping. I asked why it sounded so bad. He first babbled about a "comb filter" that could make the sound appear to come from different directions in different places in the room. (What is he talking about?)I told him I know that reverse phasing on one of the speakers could cause the sound to wander, and he acknowledged that was possible. At this point another member of the audience seated nearby commented to me, "I don't understand what you are saying, but I agree with you (the sound is terrible). The tech then said that well the Beckman is really a lecture hall, not a musical performance hall. That makes some sense, but it still sounded good at moderate levels so I think the system was just turned up too darn high and unbalanced to the right. I gave up taking with the tech shortly thereafter and returned to my seat. The sound appeared to improve a little after my discussion with the tech, but still seemed to clip occasionally. He did get it centered better also. There were probably 600 in the audience and four on the stage (one of the normal five out sick), and I felt that the tech did a gross disservice to all of those persons. Any comments or advice? I intent to write a letter to the manager of the Beckman, but want to consult the "Pros" and be sure to get my technical facts straight first. Thanks for any advice, -Harry |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article znr1102355436k@trad, Mike Rivers wrote:
In article writes: The OSHA limits are flexible and based on exposure time. You can listen to one level for a few minutes a day, and another level for an hour a day, and another level all day long. The "O" in OSHA stands for "Occupational" and unless they've changed the rules (or communities with noise ordinances have adopted OSHA standards) OSHA can't do anything for the person who attends a concert, only the people who work at the venue. Right, but it's an in. Certainly the stage levels at just about every rock concert out there exceed the OSHA standards for noise exposure. The performers therefore are breaking the rules. Kind of silly actually, considering how many laws we have that protect us from doing things that would harm ourselves. A lot of those are violated at rock concerts too. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
In article writes: The OSHA limits are flexible and based on exposure time. You can listen to one level for a few minutes a day, and another level for an hour a day, and another level all day long. The "O" in OSHA stands for "Occupational" and unless they've changed the rules (or communities with noise ordinances have adopted OSHA standards) OSHA can't do anything for the person who attends a concert, only the people who work at the venue. College campuses have evironmental health & safety departments. They are definitely concerned with the patrons' noise exposure. With touring rock shows they usually deploy a compliance officer. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, everyone, for all the responses that really helped me
understand what was going on and also encouraging me to write and complain. I'm doing that shortly, and as suggested will keep it non-technical, focusing on the high level. It surprised me that one response was from a fellow who is actually familiar with the Beckman. What are the chances...? But that made me think that I should have included this information in my original post about the Beckman from http://fob.caltech.edu/tech-info/beckman.shtml so folks would have better understood the situation. On the left of the page there is a link for the technically inclined that give details of the sound equipment in the auditorium: Building Shape: Circular with conical shaped roof Seating Capacity: 1150 (850 main floor, 300 balcony) Dimensions: 60 feet high, 120 feet in diameter So I'm sure that the Beckman is indeed an acoustic nightmare, but the fact remains that the sound was just fine to my old ears when it was moderate, but pretty horrid when it was breaking up every few seconds because the tech had the level too high. And, yes, the Persuasions is a classic acapello vocal group, so no drums. I suppose that seriously dates me. But I should tell you about the time my then-19 daughter took me to a Steve Vai concert in Boston in the club district. I had this mental image going in of a lone acoustical guitarist sitting on a stool in sort of a coffee house environment wry grin.... Thanks again for everyones' kind assistance here, and I'll let you know if anything ever comes of the complaint. -Harry |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
It surprised me that one response was from a fellow who is actually familiar with the Beckman. What are the chances...? For those who read here a while, the chances seem much better than you might expect from a casual drop-in. g -- ha |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks to all for your great replies.
I'm working on my written complaint now, and as suggested will keep it simple and just comment on the terrible sound quality and that I just feel that the level was too darn high to the point that the sound was breaking up every few seconds. I'll mention that the sound was fine during the quieter passages to defuse any suspicion that I am just being overcritical of a tough sound reinforcement situation (a round hall). And yes, the Persuasions are indeed a legacy acapella group. They were great -- oops, does that date me? Thanks again, all- -Harry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
Topic Police | Pro Audio | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |