tttttttttttttt (Willie K.Yee, M.D.) wrote in message ...
I think it was on Howard Stern that he had some porn actresses in who
did some rather moist things with a microphone. If it was an RE-20 it
would take a real professional.


Reminds me of the joke where the punchline (from the prostitute) is
"Pretty tight, huh?"

Karl Winkler
Lectrosonics, Inc.
http://www.lectrosonics.com

David Satz wrote:
Sorry, I misunderstood and thought that you wanted to know which
microphones looked the least appealing to us _as designed_.

I would have suggested the Sanken CUW-180 stereo microphone, as shown
on page 177 of the Nov. 2004 MIX Magazine, and on Sanken's Web site at
http://www.sanken-mic.com/english/ . Someone should put a sock on that.

How about S/U ratio---sound to ugliness ratio. I would vote for the ol'
RCA Bk5 as the best sounding ugliest mic.---but then sometimes I look
at the Bk5 and see it as looking beautiful. Now that is true love.

Rob R.

David Satz wrote:
Sorry, I misunderstood and thought that you wanted to know which
microphones looked the least appealing to us _as designed_.

I would have suggested the Sanken CUW-180 stereo microphone, as shown
on page 177 of the Nov. 2004 MIX Magazine, and on Sanken's Web site at
http://www.sanken-mic.com/english/ . Someone should put a sock on that.

How about S/U ratio---sound to ugliness ratio. I would vote for the ol'
RCA Bk5 as the best sounding ugliest mic.---but then sometimes I look
at the Bk5 and see it as looking beautiful. Now that is true love.

Rob R.

David Satz wrote:
Sorry, I misunderstood and thought that you wanted to know which
microphones looked the least appealing to us _as designed_.

I would have suggested the Sanken CUW-180 stereo microphone, as shown
on page 177 of the Nov. 2004 MIX Magazine, and on Sanken's Web site at
http://www.sanken-mic.com/english/ . Someone should put a sock on that.

Hey! I really like that thing. No accounting for taste I
guess. :-)


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein

David Satz wrote:
Sorry, I misunderstood and thought that you wanted to know which
microphones looked the least appealing to us _as designed_.

I would have suggested the Sanken CUW-180 stereo microphone, as shown
on page 177 of the Nov. 2004 MIX Magazine, and on Sanken's Web site at
http://www.sanken-mic.com/english/ . Someone should put a sock on that.

Hey! I really like that thing. No accounting for taste I
guess. :-)


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein

Pietro wrote:

I once put a condom on a sm57... just to capture dropping water
sounds.. but I've recently seen something really weird on Italian TV:
a man put some dog **** (ouch..) all over the foam and started
interviewing famous people..

ROTFLOL! That is pure genius!


Bob

--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein

Pietro wrote:

I once put a condom on a sm57... just to capture dropping water
sounds.. but I've recently seen something really weird on Italian TV:
a man put some dog **** (ouch..) all over the foam and started
interviewing famous people..

ROTFLOL! That is pure genius!


Bob

--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein

Bob Cain wrote:

Pietro wrote:

I once put a condom on a sm57... just to capture dropping water
sounds.. but I've recently seen something really weird on Italian TV:
a man put some dog **** (ouch..) all over the foam and started
interviewing famous people..

ROTFLOL! That is pure genius!

"And if I am elected..."

--
ha

hank alrich wrote:
Bob Cain wrote:


Pietro wrote:


I once put a condom on a sm57... just to capture dropping water
sounds.. but I've recently seen something really weird on Italian TV:
a man put some dog **** (ouch..) all over the foam and started
interviewing famous people..


ROTFLOL! That is pure genius!


"And if I am elected..."

--
ha


Tom green did that years ago
I guess it was class like that is why Drew Barrymore married him
G