Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess what it comes down to is keep your documents as numerous, detailed
and organized as possible. This could include invoices from studio time, and other production related invoices. I've been assured in the past that infringements of copyright pertaining to musical work is quite rare. I personally don't know anyone or have even heard of anyone going around stealing the work of other people. Knock on wood.... I guess all this just goes to prove the age old adage that nothing in life is for sure except for death and taxes. Roach I agree. I still fail to see why people are so paranoid about protecting their songs. We all know that making money from a song has little to do with the quality of it. Both good, and extremely bad songs, can become hits. Not only that but a lot of hit songs are written in less than an hour. It would take someone longer than that to steal one! Writing the song is the easy part. Making money from it is the difficult bit. It is now so difficult to come up with a completely original (but still attractive) melody, that most infringment cases that come up in court are no more than unfortunate coincidences. I haven't registered any of my songs, and neither do I intend to. If the proof I have of date of creation isn't good enough to win a case (in the highly unlikely event that one should arise), anyone who can make more money than me from one of my songs is welcome to it. I may just hassle them for some marketing tips though! ![]() -- Lynn ============== Listen to my music... http://www.soundclick.com/wobbly http://www.soundclick.com/lynn http://www.soundclick.com/johnmckeon http://www.soundclick.com/dickosboogieband http://music.download.com/lynn/3600-...tag=list#songs "Mike Rocha" wrote in message ... "Irene Jackson" wrote in message news:vUUod.320844$%k.22180@pd7tw2no... "Mike Rocha" wrote in message ... Whoever said that copyright does not cover anything more than the title is entirely incorrect. I stand corrected. However, this part of the Application for Copyright is what leads me to believe that protection is limited: "Do not send a copy of your work along with the application. The Copyright Office does not review or assess works in any way, nor does the Office check to see if the title of your work has already been used." Also interesting is this dooooozy: "However, registration is no guarantee against infringement. You have to take legal action on your own if you believe your rights have been violated. Also, registration is no guarantee that your claim of ownership will eventually be recognized as legitimate. Note too, that the Copyright Office does not check to ensure that your work is indeed original, as you claim. Verification of your claim can only be done through a court of law." http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/sc_mrksv/c...html#section01 So basically, in Canada, you're paying 50 bucks per certificate which in the end would be included in the pile of evidence that you'd drag to court if an infringement case occurs. Just one more document, along with your self-addressed envelope. I guess what it comes down to is keep your documents as numerous, detailed and organized as possible. This could include invoices from studio time, and other production related invoices. I've been assured in the past that infringements of copyright pertaining to musical work is quite rare. I personally don't know anyone or have even heard of anyone going around stealing the work of other people. Knock on wood.... I guess all this just goes to prove the age old adage that nothing in life is for sure except for death and taxes. Roach |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I have a question | Audio Opinions | |||
What are they Teaching | Audio Opinions | |||
question for anyone who bought an Aardvark product bundled with Cakewalk | Pro Audio | |||
Schoeps / pick-up pattern question / freq response, etc | Pro Audio | |||
Sennheiser MD 421 II Frequency Rolloff Question | Pro Audio |