Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
I have a Q that i like from you to help me about: My friend asked me for a portable device that cancel the noise around him while it amplifies his voice only. Actually, he wants to utilize his time reading in the bus, instead of wasting it. He refused the idea of mp3 player because he could not focus in reading while any noise is a round him even if it is a music. So anyone is aware of a product that can satisfy his needs. Thanx in advance for all of you..! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "moon" Hi all, I have a Q that i like from you to help me about: My friend asked me for a portable device that cancel the noise around him while it amplifies his voice only. Actually, he wants to utilize his time reading in the bus, instead of wasting it. He refused the idea of mp3 player because he could not focus in reading while any noise is a round him even if it is a music. So anyone is aware of a product that can satisfy his needs. Thanx in advance for all of you..! ** Tell your "friend" to get a hand gun - then tell everyone on the bus to "shut the ****" up or he will shoot them. They will then be listening to his every word. ............ Phil |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whilst Phil's suggestion is no doubt effective, you may be interested in
some ideas that don't carry the risk of being arrested... Noise cancelling headphones (RRP) Sony MDR-NC20 $180 Sony MDR-NC11 $150 Sony MDR-G94NC $70 Panasonic RP-HC70 $50 Panasonic RP-HC50 $40 Bose QuietComfort 2 $299 Chris -- The voice of ignorance speaks loud and long, but the words of the wise are quiet and few. -- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:11:31 +0100, Chris Whealy
wrote: Whilst Phil's suggestion is no doubt effective, you may be interested in some ideas that don't carry the risk of being arrested... Noise cancelling headphones (RRP) Sony MDR-NC20 $180 Sony MDR-NC11 $150 Sony MDR-G94NC $70 Panasonic RP-HC70 $50 Panasonic RP-HC50 $40 Bose QuietComfort 2 $299 But he doesn't want to listen to music. Without input, how are these different to ear-plugs? What's this about hearing his own voice? Does he want to talk to himself? In this case, he's probably uneducable. Why bother to read? :-) CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm "Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"moon" wrote in message
m Hi all, I have a Q that i like from you to help me about: My friend asked me for a portable device that cancel the noise around him while it amplifies his voice only. That's called a noise-cancelling microphone. Search google using the text noise cancelling microphone and numerous alternatives will be presented. Actually, he wants to utilize his time reading in the bus, instead of wasting it. That only requires that he be sighted and literate. He refused the idea of mp3 player because he could not focus in reading while any noise is a round him even if it is a music. That's called ear plugs. http://www.earplugsonline.com/index.html http://www.etymotic.com/ephp/erme.asp So anyone is aware of a product that can satisfy his needs. First he has to settle on what he wants to do. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
moon wrote:
My friend asked me for a portable device that cancel the noise around him while it amplifies his voice only. Actually, he wants to utilize his time reading in the bus, instead of wasting it. He refused the idea of mp3 player because he could not focus in reading while any noise is a round him even if it is a music. So anyone is aware of a product that can satisfy his needs. He is looking for _headphones_ that cancel outside sound, so he can listen to music, or he is looking for _microphones_ that cancel outside sound so he can record his voice while he reads? --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Oct 2004 08:54:24 -0400, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
moon wrote: My friend asked me for a portable device that cancel the noise around him while it amplifies his voice only. Actually, he wants to utilize his time reading in the bus, instead of wasting it. He refused the idea of mp3 player because he could not focus in reading while any noise is a round him even if it is a music. So anyone is aware of a product that can satisfy his needs. He is looking for _headphones_ that cancel outside sound, so he can listen to music, or he is looking for _microphones_ that cancel outside sound so he can record his voice while he reads? --scott The OP makes no mention of recording - he says the guy wants to quieten the environment and amplify his voice while sitting reading on a bus. Sounds like a quick route to a thump on the ear to me. d Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Laurence Payne wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:11:31 +0100, Chris Whealy wrote: Whilst Phil's suggestion is no doubt effective, you may be interested in some ideas that don't carry the risk of being arrested... Noise cancelling headphones (RRP) Sony MDR-NC20 $180 Sony MDR-NC11 $150 Sony MDR-G94NC $70 Panasonic RP-HC70 $50 Panasonic RP-HC50 $40 Bose QuietComfort 2 $299 But he doesn't want to listen to music. Without input, how are these different to ear-plugs? On some noises, they are more effective than earplugs. On other noises (higher frequency nonrepetitive noises) they aren't as effective as earplugs. Sennheiser also makes some nice ones, by the way. What's this about hearing his own voice? Does he want to talk to himself? In this case, he's probably uneducable. Why bother to read? :-) That's why I was wondering if he really wanted to record himself reading and the issue was a microphone and not headphones. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "moon" My friend asked me for a portable device that cancel the noise around him while it amplifies his voice only. ** Translation form the original "moon" gobbledegook. 1. The "friend" wants to sit in an electronic "cone of silence" (while reading on a bus). 2. The "friend" wants to be able to be heard if he speaks - so the electronic cone must permit his voice out. Right out of Star Trek. .............. Phil |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What the OP really needs is a Fenton Silencer.
Peace, Paul |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Mike Rivers) wrote in message news:znr1097500366k@trad...
In article writes: Sure--there are "noise-canceling headphones" available in all price ranges from about $25 to ten times as much. By the way, your friend is very smart to make that choice, since in a noisy environment it's nearly impossible to guess how loudly you're playing anything. One of the things that I like about using my noise-cancelling headphones on an airplane is that I find that I can listen to music or the in-flight movie at a lower volume than than without noise cancellation, so I figure that it's actually protecting my hearing and this probably contributes to the reduced fatigue. However, the way that this form of noise cancellation works is that it plays "opposite polarity" noise right into your ears at a level that's proportional to the ambient level that it's trying to cancel. While the SPL of the cancellation noise is limited to a few mousefarts, if you were to use them when, say, doing yard work with a gasoline-powered weed whacker while listening to your portable CD player, you might be pumping an annoyingly loud level into your ears. I suppose someone has measurements somewhere, most likely unpublished. Mike, think of it this way: With nothing covering your ears, the noise from the weed whacker comes in at full volume. With passive protection, this HF noise and a small amount of the LF noise is attenuated by the material covering your ears. By adding an "anti-wave" inside the earcups, the net sum for the treated frequencies is zero SPL, or close to it. Just like combining two waveforms, out of polarity. So this type of system actually *reduces* the noise that reaches your ears. Karl Winkler Lectrosonics, Inc. http://www.lectrosonics.com |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Mike Rivers) wrote in message news:znr1097598936k@trad...
In article writes: Mike, think of it this way: With nothing covering your ears, the noise from the weed whacker comes in at full volume. With passive protection, this HF noise and a small amount of the LF noise is attenuated by the material covering your ears. By adding an "anti-wave" inside the earcups, the net sum for the treated frequencies is zero SPL, or close to it. Just like combining two waveforms, out of polarity. So this type of system actually *reduces* the noise that reaches your ears. That sounds good in theory, but somehow I suspect that the brain deals with two separate pressures rather than dealing with the vector some of them. I'd like to see some in-the-ear-canal measurements to convince me. Do you know if there are any in the Sennheiser lab notebooks somewhere (not that I expect to ever see them)? I'm certain that such measurements exist, be they from Bose, Telex or Sennheiser (mainly for the aviation headset products) although I agree that we'll never see them... Since the ears are essentially pressure transducers, I'm curious how you think the two waves can be kept separated. At least within the earcup/ear system, the noise is actually reduced in SPL in comparison to outside the earcup. Karl Winkler Lectrosonics, Inc. http://www.lectrosonics.com |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Political | Pro Audio | |||
Topic Police | Pro Audio |