Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm searching all over for info, and someone here might be able to help me
get an answer or idea. A few companies are selling whole-house sound systems that place standard line-level audio --unbalanced-- onto unshielded twisted pair CAT-5e/6 cables. They (the manufacturers) say this works fine up to a couple hundred feet. I can't find any reason this should work. In fact, as I search the web for a rationale, I fine lots of examples where balanced signals are used on CAT 5/6, which makes good sense. Using unshielded cable makes me wonder, but that can wait a moment. I can't find anything anywhere that says unbalanced audio is OK on UTP cable. Does anybody know of some documentation on this subject, or do any of you have any experience with unbalanced line-level on UTP? -Thanks! -John O Heathkit Educational Systems (yes, *that* Heathkit!) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John O wrote:
I'm searching all over for info, and someone here might be able to help me get an answer or idea. A few companies are selling whole-house sound systems that place standard line-level audio --unbalanced-- onto unshielded twisted pair CAT-5e/6 cables. They (the manufacturers) say this works fine up to a couple hundred feet. I can't find any reason this should work. In fact, as I search the web for a rationale, I fine lots of examples where balanced signals are used on CAT 5/6, which makes good sense. Using unshielded cable makes me wonder, but that can wait a moment. I can't find anything anywhere that says unbalanced audio is OK on UTP cable. You run telephones for miles on that stuff. The reason telephones work is that they have extremely good balancing on either side of the line, very low line impedances, and good RF rejection on the front end, so that RF trash can't get into any place where it will be demodulated. The secret to this: transformers. Does anybody know of some documentation on this subject, or do any of you have any experience with unbalanced line-level on UTP? Sure, I did a 6 mile run on a burglar alarm circuit from a radio station to a transmitter for years until they modernized their STL. And I do occasionally run line signals on existing dry telco circuits, using transformer isolation on both sides of the line to get high CMRR. Without electrostatic shielding, this is the secret to making long runs work. -John O Heathkit Educational Systems (yes, *that* Heathkit!) So are you the place I go to get replacement wafer switches for my SB-620 spectrum analyzer? --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I doubt that they put transformers at each drop and
run the lines balanced, but that's possible. Again, if you're willing to sacrafice some audio quality to cheap transformers (you don't think a builder would use GOOD transformers, do you?) you wouldn't have a problem. Nope, one of each pair of signal lines is dead ground, common with the power ground. This happens to be a low-end whole-house audio system (A-Bus) and fidelity is not one of the primary features. The better systems used balanced lines, but they still do unshielded cable by default. I agree...if it were me the cables would be shielded no matter what. In the end, these systems are not intended for high-end listening or primary audio...they're for music in the rooms during a party, coming from in-wall/ceiling speakers. Home-muzak, if you will. Thanks for the insight, guys. :-) -John O |