Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have you seen the new Layla G3?
Max Arwood "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Michael C. Monroe" wrote in message Is there a Tom's Hardware-like site out there that will compare these 3 main home-studio soundcard lines head-to-head? I really can't decide between the three companies. This nets out to a comparison of the LynxTWO versus the Layla 24 versus the Delta 1010, no? That's also the order of pricing, from high to lower. That's also the approximate order of technical quality from high to lower. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Max Arwood" wrote in message
Have you seen the new Layla G3? Looks very interesting on paper! http://www.echoaudio.com/Products/PCI/Layla3G/index.php |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Max Arwood" wrote in message Have you seen the new Layla G3? Looks very interesting on paper! http://www.echoaudio.com/Products/PCI/Layla3G/index.php I'm not thrilled with the current trend of replacing two of the rear 1/4" ins with front mounted xlr pre's. The m-audio firewire interfaces do the same thing. It doesn't make it impossible to plug a snake into the thing, just sloppy and weird, especially when patchbays are involved. Doesn't anybody have other gear that they need to plug in, or are these things still aimed at people who are starting fresh? All I want from a 1394 audio card are eight ins and outs on 1/4" jacks and the ability to daisy chain the things. Simple, universal, and unavailable. jb |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What about the Roland UA-1000 or the Presonus Firepod?
eric reddred wrote: "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Max Arwood" wrote in message om Have you seen the new Layla G3? Looks very interesting on paper! http://www.echoaudio.com/Products/PCI/Layla3G/index.php I'm not thrilled with the current trend of replacing two of the rear 1/4" ins with front mounted xlr pre's. The m-audio firewire interfaces do the same thing. It doesn't make it impossible to plug a snake into the thing, just sloppy and weird, especially when patchbays are involved. Doesn't anybody have other gear that they need to plug in, or are these things still aimed at people who are starting fresh? All I want from a 1394 audio card are eight ins and outs on 1/4" jacks and the ability to daisy chain the things. Simple, universal, and unavailable. jb |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have the Edirol/Roland UA-1000. For me, it works well and, since all the
IO that is on the front is replicated on the back, you can use a snake with it. The only drawback I have found is that the sample rate is a knob on the front and can't be controlled with software. Additionally, changing the sample rate with the knob requires a reboot of the unit (!?!?) turing test "Eric Deibler" wrote in message ... What about the Roland UA-1000 or the Presonus Firepod? eric reddred wrote: "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Max Arwood" wrote in message . com Have you seen the new Layla G3? Looks very interesting on paper! http://www.echoaudio.com/Products/PCI/Layla3G/index.php I'm not thrilled with the current trend of replacing two of the rear 1/4" ins with front mounted xlr pre's. The m-audio firewire interfaces do the same thing. It doesn't make it impossible to plug a snake into the thing, just sloppy and weird, especially when patchbays are involved. Doesn't anybody have other gear that they need to plug in, or are these things still aimed at people who are starting fresh? All I want from a 1394 audio card are eight ins and outs on 1/4" jacks and the ability to daisy chain the things. Simple, universal, and unavailable. jb |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
How does it perform in SONAR?
eric turing test wrote: I have the Edirol/Roland UA-1000. For me, it works well and, since all the IO that is on the front is replicated on the back, you can use a snake with it. The only drawback I have found is that the sample rate is a knob on the front and can't be controlled with software. Additionally, changing the sample rate with the knob requires a reboot of the unit (!?!?) turing test |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I use it in Sonar, Live, and other audio programs with no problems at all.
I have not tried to record all 8 inputs at once, but I have played back through 8 different outputs with no issues. They provide ASIO drivers so you can get the latency quite low. turing test "Eric Deibler" wrote in message ... How does it perform in SONAR? eric turing test wrote: I have the Edirol/Roland UA-1000. For me, it works well and, since all the IO that is on the front is replicated on the back, you can use a snake with it. The only drawback I have found is that the sample rate is a knob on the front and can't be controlled with software. Additionally, changing the sample rate with the knob requires a reboot of the unit (!?!?) turing test |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Max Arwood" wrote in message Have you seen the new Layla G3? Looks very interesting on paper! http://www.echoaudio.com/Products/PCI/Layla3G/index.php I'm not thrilled with the current trend of replacing two of the rear 1/4" ins with front mounted xlr pre's. The m-audio firewire interfaces do the same thing. It doesn't make it impossible to plug a snake into the thing, just sloppy and weird, especially when patchbays are involved. Doesn't anybody have other gear that they need to plug in, or are these things still aimed at people who are starting fresh? All I want from a 1394 audio card are eight ins and outs on 1/4" jacks and the ability to daisy chain the things. Simple, universal, and unavailable. jb |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Max Arwood" wrote in message
Have you seen the new Layla G3? Looks very interesting on paper! http://www.echoaudio.com/Products/PCI/Layla3G/index.php |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
on topic: we need a rec.audio.pro.ot newsgroup! | Pro Audio | |||
OT Political | Pro Audio |