Buster Mudd wrote:

Gosh, d'ya think maybe I'll **** off Ty Ford by posting this here?


Ty who?


Monday, September 20th, 2004
Put Away Your Hankies...a message from Michael Moore


Michael Moore
www.michaelmoore.com



Good article. This guy should do a movie.

Buster Mudd wrote:

Gosh, d'ya think maybe I'll **** off Ty Ford by posting this here?


Ty who?


Monday, September 20th, 2004
Put Away Your Hankies...a message from Michael Moore


Michael Moore
www.michaelmoore.com



Good article. This guy should do a movie.

"Don Cooper" wrote in message
...


Buster Mudd wrote:

Gosh, d'ya think maybe I'll **** off Ty Ford by posting this here?


Ty who?


Monday, September 20th, 2004
Put Away Your Hankies...a message from Michael Moore


Michael Moore
www.michaelmoore.com



Good article. This guy should do a movie.

Just because he can write, you think he should direct? Jiminy.

Glenn D.

"Don Cooper" wrote in message
...


Buster Mudd wrote:

Gosh, d'ya think maybe I'll **** off Ty Ford by posting this here?


Ty who?


Monday, September 20th, 2004
Put Away Your Hankies...a message from Michael Moore


Michael Moore
www.michaelmoore.com



Good article. This guy should do a movie.

Just because he can write, you think he should direct? Jiminy.

Glenn D.

"Don Cooper" wrote in message
...


Buster Mudd wrote:

Gosh, d'ya think maybe I'll **** off Ty Ford by posting this here?


Ty who?


Monday, September 20th, 2004
Put Away Your Hankies...a message from Michael Moore


Michael Moore
www.michaelmoore.com



Good article. This guy should do a movie.

Just because he can write, you think he should direct? Jiminy.

Glenn D.

Glenn Dowdy wrote:

Just because he can write, you think he should direct? Jiminy.


Cricket?

It was a joke.

Glenn Dowdy wrote:

Just because he can write, you think he should direct? Jiminy.


Cricket?

It was a joke.

Glenn Dowdy wrote:

Just because he can write, you think he should direct? Jiminy.


Cricket?

It was a joke.

Buster Mudd wrote:

Nothing himself.


Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
even if I agreed with the view ).

If you have nothing of value to contribute yourself then sod off.


Graham

Buster Mudd wrote:

Nothing himself.


Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
even if I agreed with the view ).

If you have nothing of value to contribute yourself then sod off.


Graham

Buster Mudd wrote:

Nothing himself.


Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
even if I agreed with the view ).

If you have nothing of value to contribute yourself then sod off.


Graham

Pooh Bear wrote:

Buster Mudd wrote:

Nothing himself.


Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
even if I agreed with the view ).

If you have nothing of value to contribute yourself then sod off.



It was of MUCH value.

Pooh Bear wrote:

Buster Mudd wrote:

Nothing himself.


Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
even if I agreed with the view ).

If you have nothing of value to contribute yourself then sod off.



It was of MUCH value.

Pooh Bear wrote:

Buster Mudd wrote:

Nothing himself.


Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
even if I agreed with the view ).

If you have nothing of value to contribute yourself then sod off.



It was of MUCH value.

Pete Dimsman wrote:

Pooh Bear wrote:

Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
even if I agreed with the view ).

WHY?

Because there are enough OT posts here as it is.

If you have something to say yourself - that's one thing - but simply posting
copied text is truly lame.


Graham

Pete Dimsman wrote:

Pooh Bear wrote:

Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
even if I agreed with the view ).

WHY?

Because there are enough OT posts here as it is.

If you have something to say yourself - that's one thing - but simply posting
copied text is truly lame.


Graham

Pete Dimsman wrote:

Pooh Bear wrote:

Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
even if I agreed with the view ).

WHY?

Because there are enough OT posts here as it is.

If you have something to say yourself - that's one thing - but simply posting
copied text is truly lame.


Graham

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:04:17 -0400, Pooh Bear wrote
(in article ):



Buster Mudd wrote:

Nothing himself.


Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
even if I agreed with the view ).

If you have nothing of value to contribute yourself then sod off.


Graham


Well put, Graham. Recycling someone elses's crap is simply that.

Buster (or whatever you're REAL name is), your post is basically the same as
one from any equipment troll who's interested in promoting the latest
bull**** mic to unsuspecting members of this newsgroup.

Every post you make is an opportunity to enrich this group. Your efforts
dilute the importance of the group and why we're here. That's pretty pitiful.


Ty Ford





-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:04:17 -0400, Pooh Bear wrote
(in article ):



Buster Mudd wrote:

Nothing himself.


Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
even if I agreed with the view ).

If you have nothing of value to contribute yourself then sod off.


Graham


Well put, Graham. Recycling someone elses's crap is simply that.

Buster (or whatever you're REAL name is), your post is basically the same as
one from any equipment troll who's interested in promoting the latest
bull**** mic to unsuspecting members of this newsgroup.

Every post you make is an opportunity to enrich this group. Your efforts
dilute the importance of the group and why we're here. That's pretty pitiful.


Ty Ford





-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

Pooh Bear wrote:


If you have something to say yourself - that's one thing - but simply posting
copied text is truly lame.


And there, in a nutshell is President Bush. And you are right, truly lame.

Pooh Bear wrote:


If you have something to say yourself - that's one thing - but simply posting
copied text is truly lame.


And there, in a nutshell is President Bush. And you are right, truly lame.

Ty Ford wrote in message ...

Recycling someone elses's crap is simply that.


You mean like the time you posted the *entire* RAP FAQ in response to
a post about what it takes to get elected president?

Ty Ford wrote in message ...

Recycling someone elses's crap is simply that.


You mean like the time you posted the *entire* RAP FAQ in response to
a post about what it takes to get elected president?

Buster Mudd wrote:

You mean like the time you posted the *entire* RAP FAQ in response to
a post about what it takes to get elected president?


D'oh!

Buster Mudd wrote:

You mean like the time you posted the *entire* RAP FAQ in response to
a post about what it takes to get elected president?


D'oh!

"Buster Mudd" wrote:

You mean like the time you posted the *entire* RAP FAQ in response to
a post about what it takes to get elected president?




Well, obviously some people have never read it.

Then there are those who have read it but don't think it applies to
them. They could stand to read it again...

Besides, what better place to bring it up? It would have been the most
on-topic and relevant post in the thread.

Sincerely,
A Guy Who's Getting REALLY ****ing tired of wasting half of his less and
less frequent visits having to wade through mountains of completely
irrelevant bull****, much of which extols the virtues of ****ing up what
once was and still could be a decent PRO AUDIO forum. Yeesh.

--
"It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!"
- Lorin David Schultz
in the control room
making even bad news sound good

(Remove spamblock to reply)

"Buster Mudd" wrote:

You mean like the time you posted the *entire* RAP FAQ in response to
a post about what it takes to get elected president?




Well, obviously some people have never read it.

Then there are those who have read it but don't think it applies to
them. They could stand to read it again...

Besides, what better place to bring it up? It would have been the most
on-topic and relevant post in the thread.

Sincerely,
A Guy Who's Getting REALLY ****ing tired of wasting half of his less and
less frequent visits having to wade through mountains of completely
irrelevant bull****, much of which extols the virtues of ****ing up what
once was and still could be a decent PRO AUDIO forum. Yeesh.

--
"It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!"
- Lorin David Schultz
in the control room
making even bad news sound good

(Remove spamblock to reply)