"Logan Shaw"
Phil Allison wrote:
Chris Hornbeck
I think all these caveats are just good practical conservativism. No
motors like being throttled back, including gasoline auto engines.



** Utter bull****.

** Utter bull****.

Oh look, we both provided the same level of _informative_ rebuttal



** An unsupported ( plus ridiculous ) assertion needs no rebuttal.

In legal terms there is simply "no case to answer".

The makers of such assertions needs to provide **their** reasoning.



that helps others know why they're wrong instead of just insisting
that we're right.


** Then why not ask Hornbeck to justify his mad assertion ???

I cannot be bothered since the dude is a raving nut case.



I guess that means that as of now, the argument
is tied one to one.



** What you "guess" is a just as smelly as anything else you blow out your
backside.





................ Phil