Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay, here is some more info:
First, I will check with MRL, Inc. for advice on accuracy of the alignment but I don't use the tapes for under 1K. As Scot mentions, fringing is mainly a problem at the low end. The heads are supposed to be 'hotter', so that isn't an issue. In fact, I can live with the levels. I am able to get a good +6 on repro. Sync only gets down to a +5 on a couple of tracks and is weak on bass, but I don't mind. These heads did come from John French. He is putting together another A800 8trk right now and will be able to do some tests for me and compare results. As of now my 2 issues a 1. I'm not too sure how significant the individual channel bias adjustments are. If you are familiar with the Studer procedure the channel gets set to 3dB over peak, then the master is set based on tape...in our case 1.75 over peak. I can only get 1dB over on the channels (the pot max clockwise), but then the master has plenty of room to get the 1.75. I don't know if the channel adjustment is a problem or not. 2. Erase depth isn't very good. To get the very minimum erase I have the master set to over 6V p-p. Tuning the channels will give me about 66dB erase and tons of 'rocks' noise. After a second erase pass the signal is then completely gone. I think this indicates the erase head is the correct width and height, but that is for John to tell me (I just sent him an email tonight, so I won't hear from him till tomorrow). Does anyone have any ideas on erase issues like this? Thank all of you for input. Dennis |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Studer A800 MKIII 24trk w/ autolocator, stand, and Sync unit | Pro Audio | |||
WTB: Studer 16 Track 2" Headstack | Pro Audio | |||
Otari MTR 90 MKIII or Studer A800 MKIII | Pro Audio | |||
WTB- STuder 820 or 827 1" 8 track | Pro Audio | |||
WTB- Studer 820/ 827 - 1" 8 track | Pro Audio |