Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Are USB interfaces that good or is there a some difference in the sound quality between it and the PCI card delta-44. Is either of them good enough for almost pro quality vocal recording (assuming you have a almost pro: studio room, pre-amp and microphone). Anyone have any idea. Thanks. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"chowdhury" wrote in message
Are USB interfaces that good or is there a some difference in the sound quality between it and the PCI card delta-44. Let me illustrate the problem as follows: A PCI Audiophile 2496 has two analog channels and a digital port that handles 2 more channels. All interfaces can operate full-duplex. If you do the math, the total data rate is: 4(channels) times 2(full duplex) time 24 (data bits) times 96000 (samples per second) = 18,432,000 bits per second. In the case of the Delta 44 is has four analog channels and no digital interface. It's aggregate data rate is therefore the same as the PCI Audiophile 2496. Any USB 1.1 audio device is limited to an absolute and total maximum of about 12,000,000 bits per second. From this you must deduct USB device, interface, framing and protocol overhead, which is substantial. As they say, do the math! 18,432,000 12,000,000 - overhead ....even if USB overhead were zero. USB overhead is much greater than zero! Is either of them good enough for almost pro quality vocal recording (assuming you have a almost pro: studio room, pre-amp and microphone). In fact, even far lesser interfaces such as the Creative Labs SoundBlaster USB MP3, are good enough for *almost* pro quality vocal recording. Just keep the audio levels going into to it up high enough so that there is no clipping with the input gain turned all the way down. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio | |||
M-Audio audiophile 2496 + Serial ATA + WinXP HELP!!!! | Pro Audio |