Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been horsing around with noise reduction software and as an experiment,
tried removing ambient room noise from a recording made in a hotel lounge (sound off homemade video) in a big open atrium, by sampling different levels of audience chatter etc. I've created a midi orchestral arrangement around a particular performance. This singer did a super job on this song, but with a somewhat sparse, though talented band. The overall effect is pretty good but the remaining audience noise is a bit distracting. The particular software I'm using is Wave Repair. I find I can get rid of some of the noise this way without killing the music too badly, but what's left behind sounds like "ghost talk". It has this almost eerie quality that comes and goes. What I've noticed is that as you get more aggressive, the first thing that really suffers is the piano. The singer, bass and the midi drums stay far more intact. Is that because it has complex harmonics some of which corresponds to the same frequencies as the room noise? Any other suggestions for this kind of effort? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doc" wrote in
nk.net: I find I can get rid of some of the noise this way without killing the music too badly, but what's left behind sounds like "ghost talk". It has this almost eerie quality that comes and goes. What you're hearing is a powerful NR with a threshold in the middle of the conversation levels. Audience noise below that level is muted and above that level it suddenly appears, but only in those frequencies above the threshold. What I've noticed is that as you get more aggressive, the first thing that really suffers is the piano. The singer, bass and the midi drums stay far more intact. Is that because it has complex harmonics some of which corresponds to the same frequencies as the room noise? The piano has a huge dynamic range. The impact of the hammers is very loud, but the decay quickly drops below your noise threshold, killing the sustained tone. The singer and the bass are more sustained. The drums are simply louder than the noise threshold. Any other suggestions for this kind of effort? Rather than one all-inclusive pass, try several lighter passes, reducing the amount of noise you take out in each pass. Lower both the threshold and the amount of noise reduction if that's possible. If you do it right, you'll end up with the background voices still audible all the time but less intrusive. If your software has a frequency response modifier, remove more bass noise than treble. The hiss is not as objectionable as the bumps and rumbles of LF. You won't be able to remove all the audience noise. To do so would remove a significant portion of the real audio signal. Your NR software is not smart enough to distinguish the singer from the guy in the front row except by volume. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doc" wrote in
nk.net: I find I can get rid of some of the noise this way without killing the music too badly, but what's left behind sounds like "ghost talk". It has this almost eerie quality that comes and goes. What you're hearing is a powerful NR with a threshold in the middle of the conversation levels. Audience noise below that level is muted and above that level it suddenly appears, but only in those frequencies above the threshold. What I've noticed is that as you get more aggressive, the first thing that really suffers is the piano. The singer, bass and the midi drums stay far more intact. Is that because it has complex harmonics some of which corresponds to the same frequencies as the room noise? The piano has a huge dynamic range. The impact of the hammers is very loud, but the decay quickly drops below your noise threshold, killing the sustained tone. The singer and the bass are more sustained. The drums are simply louder than the noise threshold. Any other suggestions for this kind of effort? Rather than one all-inclusive pass, try several lighter passes, reducing the amount of noise you take out in each pass. Lower both the threshold and the amount of noise reduction if that's possible. If you do it right, you'll end up with the background voices still audible all the time but less intrusive. If your software has a frequency response modifier, remove more bass noise than treble. The hiss is not as objectionable as the bumps and rumbles of LF. You won't be able to remove all the audience noise. To do so would remove a significant portion of the real audio signal. Your NR software is not smart enough to distinguish the singer from the guy in the front row except by volume. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
Ferstler on recording | Audio Opinions | |||
More on Equalizers from Ferstler | Audio Opinions | |||
recording a piano and flute duo? | Pro Audio | |||
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 1/5) | Car Audio |