Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Doc
 
Posts: n/a
Default Removing crowd noise from live recording killls piano

I've been horsing around with noise reduction software and as an experiment,
tried removing ambient room noise from a recording made in a hotel lounge
(sound off homemade video) in a big open atrium, by sampling different
levels of audience chatter etc. I've created a midi orchestral arrangement
around a particular performance. This singer did a super job on this song,
but with a somewhat sparse, though talented band. The overall effect is
pretty good but the remaining audience noise is a bit distracting. The
particular software I'm using is Wave Repair.

I find I can get rid of some of the noise this way without killing the music
too badly, but what's left behind sounds like "ghost talk". It has this
almost eerie quality that comes and goes.

What I've noticed is that as you get more aggressive, the first thing that
really suffers is the piano. The singer, bass and the midi drums stay far
more intact. Is that because it has complex harmonics some of which
corresponds to the same frequencies as the room noise?

Any other suggestions for this kind of effort?





  #2   Report Post  
Carey Carlan
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Doc" wrote in
nk.net:

I find I can get rid of some of the noise this way without killing the
music too badly, but what's left behind sounds like "ghost talk". It
has this almost eerie quality that comes and goes.


What you're hearing is a powerful NR with a threshold in the middle of the
conversation levels. Audience noise below that level is muted and above
that level it suddenly appears, but only in those frequencies above the
threshold.

What I've noticed is that as you get more aggressive, the first thing
that really suffers is the piano. The singer, bass and the midi drums
stay far more intact. Is that because it has complex harmonics some
of which corresponds to the same frequencies as the room noise?


The piano has a huge dynamic range. The impact of the hammers is very
loud, but the decay quickly drops below your noise threshold, killing the
sustained tone. The singer and the bass are more sustained. The drums are
simply louder than the noise threshold.

Any other suggestions for this kind of effort?


Rather than one all-inclusive pass, try several lighter passes, reducing
the amount of noise you take out in each pass. Lower both the threshold
and the amount of noise reduction if that's possible.

If you do it right, you'll end up with the background voices still audible
all the time but less intrusive. If your software has a frequency response
modifier, remove more bass noise than treble. The hiss is not as
objectionable as the bumps and rumbles of LF.

You won't be able to remove all the audience noise. To do so would remove
a significant portion of the real audio signal. Your NR software is not
smart enough to distinguish the singer from the guy in the front row except
by volume.
  #3   Report Post  
Carey Carlan
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Doc" wrote in
nk.net:

I find I can get rid of some of the noise this way without killing the
music too badly, but what's left behind sounds like "ghost talk". It
has this almost eerie quality that comes and goes.


What you're hearing is a powerful NR with a threshold in the middle of the
conversation levels. Audience noise below that level is muted and above
that level it suddenly appears, but only in those frequencies above the
threshold.

What I've noticed is that as you get more aggressive, the first thing
that really suffers is the piano. The singer, bass and the midi drums
stay far more intact. Is that because it has complex harmonics some
of which corresponds to the same frequencies as the room noise?


The piano has a huge dynamic range. The impact of the hammers is very
loud, but the decay quickly drops below your noise threshold, killing the
sustained tone. The singer and the bass are more sustained. The drums are
simply louder than the noise threshold.

Any other suggestions for this kind of effort?


Rather than one all-inclusive pass, try several lighter passes, reducing
the amount of noise you take out in each pass. Lower both the threshold
and the amount of noise reduction if that's possible.

If you do it right, you'll end up with the background voices still audible
all the time but less intrusive. If your software has a frequency response
modifier, remove more bass noise than treble. The hiss is not as
objectionable as the bumps and rumbles of LF.

You won't be able to remove all the audience noise. To do so would remove
a significant portion of the real audio signal. Your NR software is not
smart enough to distinguish the singer from the guy in the front row except
by volume.
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk xy Pro Audio 385 December 29th 04 12:00 AM
Ferstler on recording Howard Ferstler Audio Opinions 108 September 25th 04 05:09 PM
More on Equalizers from Ferstler Howard Ferstler Audio Opinions 515 September 20th 04 05:49 AM
recording a piano and flute duo? jnorman Pro Audio 10 May 18th 04 04:21 AM
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 1/5) Ian D. Bjorhovde Car Audio 0 March 6th 04 06:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:35 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"