Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
In a few weeks I'll be moving to a new house, and I have to choose a room for recording and mixing. I've been reading Ethan Winer's acoustic FAQ, so I know some basics but I don't have enough knowledge and practical experience to make a choice beforehand - especially because of the odd shape of the attic. If it's not a clear cut case after all I'll just try them both out by doing some simple evaluations using white noise/sine wave sweep recordings. Which room will need the least acoustical treatment? The rooms I can choose between are a regular 'rectangular' room with dimensions 4.05 x 2.97 x 2.6 meter (13 x 9.9 x 8.7 ft) (LWH) or the 'triangular' attic, having a rectangular floor of 8.25m x 2.35m (27.5 x 7.8 ft), and being 2.5 meters (8,3 ft) high, shown on the ascii-art figure below, seen from the side: /\ / \ / \ / \ /--------\ The first room has 1 concrete wall and three plaster walls, the attic's ceiling is covered with sawdust panels, its back wall is concrete, and the front wall is a plaster wall. I find it especially hard to evaluate the merits/problems of the attic. At first subjective hearing it sounded quite natural. But I wonder if there will be a problem mixing in the room because of the early reflections since the room is not very deep and the ceiling is narrowing quickly. So would you advice to get proper treatment for the rectangular room because its acoustic properties are much more predictable or does the attic have some acoustic virtues that make it worthwhile? Also, how would one approach bass trapping in such a room? Thanks in advance for your reply, Cheers, Walco |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More on Equalizers from Ferstler | Audio Opinions |