Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey there Scott. First off, thanks for your response on another thread
concerning historicl standards of pitch. I should have guessed that your situation involved a renaiscance or barouque chamber group, as i am familiar with that. I remember also reading out of the Helmholtz book years ago, I'll have to check it out again now, at your suggestion. I'm familiar with the "200 warhorses" syndrome re classical music and, unfortunately, it's not just the radio, but symphony orchestras in many cases, as well. Here's why. The boards of directors for both the classical music radio stations and the symphony are comprised of people of great wealth who, unfortunately, know little about music. They "know" that Mozart was the "best" ever, so, guess what era makes up 80 % of the playlist at WDAV Davidson college (NC) here? Classical era music is neat, tidy, and orderly, and that is their notion of what classical music is "supposed" to be like. Play some Charles Ives and they say, in 'valley-girl' tone, "ewwwwwwwwww, whats thaaaaaaaaaat?". The other 20% of the playlist are the warhorses from other eras. Bless their souls, that is 'outre' or 'getting wacky!' for them. In Atlanta, Joel Levy got run out of town by this crowd. The title of "musical director/conductor" is slowly becoming merely titular, regarding the fist part, as these boards are insidiously arrogating the 'musical direction' part to themselves. Back to radio. These do-gooders consider that they are doing a civic duty in sustaining music that otherwise could fall by the wayside and, unfotunately, that is at least partially true. On the other hand, how much good are they actually doing for the longterm viability of classical music when nothing gets played now that would interest a young person? When i was a teenager, i listened to Deep Purple, Jethro Tull, Alice Cooper, Fairport Convention, Led Zep, Elton John, Yes, the good, bad, ugly, cheap, 'progressive', and all points inbetween. There was no brow high or low enough for me. It was in this spirit that i would tune in the classical music station on a semi-regular basis. Though a particular era got more playlist for a couple or three months at a time, i regularly heard music from all eras then. And this slowly changing emphasis was great, because it allowed me to "grok" what that era of music was about. It takes awhile for the 'sensibilities' of a particular style of music to settle in before you 'understand' it. What do kids have nowadays?, Well, an appropriate motto for my local station could easily be; "All Motzart! All The Time!". *heavy sigh, .........*. How do we expext the venturesome kids of today to listen to _that_ for any length of time? or want to tune it in again? When i was a kid, in the 'get-stoned-listen-to-music' sessions at my house, i'd sometimes put on some classical record (i actually purchased one or two a year, after buying all that other stuff, and there was my mom's colletion). Sometimes i'd get an "eww, yuk, what's thaaat?" reaction. (those are the ones on the boards of directors of symphony and classical music radio stations now), but other times i'd get an *interested* "what's that?" reaction. I'd say "it's Bach! ya gotta hear this!" It might be one movement of a Brandenburg or a Violin Concerto in E Major, and i'd say, "no! listen! this is 'rock and roll' in 1705 or 1715! isn't it? listen!". I'd jump up and down, get all excited, and a few would say "yeah! you're right! it IS rock and roll! that's neat!", etc. Or, the Toccata and Fugue in D Minor, and i'd say, "hey! listen! this is like "Inna Godda Dovina", but a hundred times better!" For those that enjoyed the experience, they'd look all 'spaced out', as we used to say, afterwards, and say "no, it's 1,000 times better, .........". I loved introducing people to these things, and one or two would ask how i knew about all this. Back then, there was a radio station i could point them to. So then, no good news here for classical music, either radio or the local symphony, but good news elswise re the radio. WNCW from Isothermal College in Spindale NC spins a polyglot playlist of most all contemporary music, other than classical. Bands-you-never-heard-of, to Radiohead, to some bluegrass version of Prince's "Raspberry Beret" (honest), to another-band-you-never-heard-of, to Tori Amos, to, .......; it's like that all week. But the fun part is weekends, where it's primarily folk, bluegrass, gospel, old blues, 'traditional', etc. Huge collection of archived 78's. All the Jimmy Rogers you'd ever want. lol However, what's *really* nice is that they have live bands, in the studio, broadcasting live! THIS is what radio is about, folks! "Radio Hour" at it's finest. Interveiw and congenial chat, before, inbetween songs, and a nice plug for their concerts that week. I used to be able to hear live broadcasts of symphony concerts in years past. The sound quality of a live radio broadcast, even with mediocre gear on both ends, exceeds that of even 'direct to disc' or Mercury 'living presence' records. My folks lived near Chicago some years ago. and i got to hear WFMT, one of the best sound quality FM stations in the country. My Cassette tape recording of a couple of their live broadcasts resides alongside the aforementioned records as a 'reference' for me ( I hauled my Tandberg up there on one visit, just for the purpose). Oh well, i realize that the instigating question was bogus, but i'll say that if i had to choose between television or radio, (yeah, i know it was 'PBS or NPR') my TV would be in the trash bin right now. It's comming close to that anyway. Live radio beats even "Austin City Limits" or "Soundstage" any day of the week. JF |