Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Sun, 09 May 2004 22:41:58 GMT, Rick wrote: On Sun, 09 May 2004 11:55:56 -0700, Susie Simcox wrote: In fact it is not even a close contest. One study after another proves that Linux cost more money to implement and use than Windows. Why not talk facts instead of blowing Linux crap out of your A$$'s expecting people to believe the tripe you pass off for facts. http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/facts/ ahahah ahahahah HAHAhah HAHa ha ahah aahahah ... m$ facts... ahaha ahaha aha ahah Oh, you're serious? ahaha ahaha ahhhhha aha aha ha ah So IOW you can't offer up anything to refute the points but bull****? Typical Linux luser. Clearly Linux is cheaper. There are no useful apps available for it! :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Windows XP, Midi and Audio | Pro Audio | |||
DAW & Windows XP RAID Tips, ProTools error -9086 | Pro Audio | |||
Ardour, linux DAW? | Pro Audio | |||
Re-Installing Windows (was: My Experience with Carillon Computers) | Pro Audio |