"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925


If I were calling from home it wouldn't showed since it's normally blocked
to keep down telephone solicitors.

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:21:49 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925


If I were calling from home it wouldn't showed since it's normally blocked
to keep down telephone solicitors.

Well, there are plenty of people who don't answer blocked phone calls,
reasoning that if someone is concealing their name (which usually is
what's displayed anyway), they aren't someone worth answering. I
suspect that it's especially true for someone who is operating a
"professional/referral" type business like a consulting psychologist.
After all, they probably feel even more strongly about telephone
solicitors, most of whom block their IDs.

BTW, you should get on the national "do not call" list. I did and my
solicitations went from about 10-20 a day to maybe three or four a
week at most.

Frankly, I think this obsession is turning from a source of amusement
to something a bit scary. Obviously, the fact that he is precisely
listed in the Yellow Pages isn't good enough for you. Now you must
CALL the guy? It's already been done, remember?

Dave Weil wrote:


On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:21:49 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925


If I were calling from home it wouldn't showed since it's normally blocked
to keep down telephone solicitors.

Well, there are plenty of people who don't answer blocked phone calls,
reasoning that if someone is concealing their name (which usually is
what's displayed anyway), they aren't someone worth answering. I
suspect that it's especially true for someone who is operating a
"professional/referral" type business like a consulting psychologist.
After all, they probably feel even more strongly about telephone
solicitors, most of whom block their IDs.

BTW, you should get on the national "do not call" list. I did and my
solicitations went from about 10-20 a day to maybe three or four a
week at most.

Frankly, I think this obsession is turning from a source of amusement
to something a bit scary. Obviously, the fact that he is precisely
listed in the Yellow Pages isn't good enough for you. Now you must
CALL the guy? It's already been done, remember?




I think proven liar and stalker McKelvy realizes that his 7 year libel campaign
has been an abject failure, convincing nobody but himself and Krueger of
anything. All it's done is make them look even more foolish and guilty, as
well as motivate all reasonable people to question the validity of anything
they have to say. After all, an individual that would knowingly lie and
fabricate one bizarre statement after another about a person they've never even
met is clearly sociopathic and/or delusional.



Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Dave Weil wrote:


On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:21:49 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925


If I were calling from home it wouldn't showed since it's normally
blocked
to keep down telephone solicitors.

Well, there are plenty of people who don't answer blocked phone calls,
reasoning that if someone is concealing their name (which usually is
what's displayed anyway), they aren't someone worth answering. I
suspect that it's especially true for someone who is operating a
"professional/referral" type business like a consulting psychologist.
After all, they probably feel even more strongly about telephone
solicitors, most of whom block their IDs.

BTW, you should get on the national "do not call" list. I did and my
solicitations went from about 10-20 a day to maybe three or four a
week at most.

Frankly, I think this obsession is turning from a source of amusement
to something a bit scary. Obviously, the fact that he is precisely
listed in the Yellow Pages isn't good enough for you. Now you must
CALL the guy? It's already been done, remember?




I think proven liar and stalker McKelvy realizes that his 7 year libel
campaign
has been an abject failure,

INsofar as they are figmaents of your imagination, yes.

convincing nobody but himself and Krueger of
anything.

The only thing I've been trying to convince myself of is you being who you
say you are.

All it's done is make them look even more foolish and guilty, as
well as motivate all reasonable people to question the validity of
anything
they have to say.

Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly reasonable.

After all, an individual that would knowingly lie and
fabricate one bizarre statement after another about a person they've never
even
met is clearly sociopathic and/or delusional.



Then why do you keep doing it?

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...
:
: Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly reasonable.

Kinda new in this bar. Can you define or list the usual gang of RAO
thugs ..
one likes to know on what end of the bar to sip the martini's, eh
Rudy

"Ruud Broens" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...
:
: Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly reasonable.

Kinda new in this bar. Can you define or list the usual gang of RAO
thugs ..
one likes to know on what end of the bar to sip the martini's, eh
Rudy


My perspective is that there are basically two groups of people that haunt
this place.

The first one is the one that accepts that there are laws of physics and
that audio must conform to them and that there are no magic rocks, wires, or
clarifiers. There are no major sonic differences between amps, preamps, or
CD players so long as they are Solid State and competently designed to give
flat Frequency Response.

There are ways to discover subtle differences between such devices and that
involves the use of a Double Blind comparison.

There is the other group that espouse the idea that if somebody heard it, it
must be real, even if it conflicts with the laws of physics, as in the case
of things like Shakti Stones.

Those who have pointed out that some of the ideas that people have about
audio don't match reality are offended by having these things pointed out to
them. In response they have decided that it is OK for them to use any lie
any tactic no matter how repulsive or demeaning to try and make them either
go away or lose credibility.

They claim that the first group is anti-choice.
They claim the first groups says that everything sounds the same.

This has been going on for at least 10 years that I know of, most of the
really nasty stuff is directed at Arny Krueger, but it could be anybody who
thinks that a DBT is a way to find audible differences.

"Ruud Broens" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...
:
: Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly reasonable.

Kinda new in this bar. Can you define or list the usual gang of RAO
thugs ..
one likes to know on what end of the bar to sip the martini's, eh
Rudy



At one end of the bar, all the patrons think that all Scotch
tastes the same. At the other end of the bar, some think that some
Scotches taste better than others. Which end are you at?

Ruud Broens a écrit :
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...
:
: Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly reasonable.

Kinda new in this bar. Can you define or list the usual gang of RAO
thugs ..

Like in the other bars guys here are wasting time.
Long flame wars instead of long drinks, it's safer for the liver but not
for the brain.

one likes to know on what end of the bar to sip the martini's, eh

Martini ? It's in the other room, with the ladies. )