"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:30:56 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:55:06 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

If you live in Miami and practice in or near there why is your name and
number not listed?

At least not listed in Yellow.com

You must have learned your search techniques from Arnold Krueger.

I got this listing from Yellow.com:

Richman Bruce J PhD
3...
North Miami Beach, FL ...

Is that the 5033 number?

You tell me.

That's the only Bruce Richman Phd. I can find. I've called from my cell
phone which doesn't block the number I'm calling from. If it's his number
he should be able to confirm I've called.

How far is N. Miami from Miami? Why doesn't
anybody ever answer?

Probably caller ID. If you tried to call me, I wouldn't answer either.

How would you know it was me?

Glad you figured it out though.

Address deleted manually by me because this is RAO, after all.

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:30:56 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:55:06 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

If you live in Miami and practice in or near there why is your name and
number not listed?

At least not listed in Yellow.com

You must have learned your search techniques from Arnold Krueger.

I got this listing from Yellow.com:

Richman Bruce J PhD
3...
North Miami Beach, FL ...

Is that the 5033 number?

You tell me.

That's the only Bruce Richman Phd. I can find. I've called from my cell
phone which doesn't block the number I'm calling from. If it's his number
he should be able to confirm I've called.

How far is N. Miami from Miami? Why doesn't
anybody ever answer?

Probably caller ID. If you tried to call me, I wouldn't answer either.

How would you know it was me?

Glad you figured it out though.

Address deleted manually by me because this is RAO, after all.

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925


If I were calling from home it wouldn't showed since it's normally blocked
to keep down telephone solicitors.

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:21:49 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925


If I were calling from home it wouldn't showed since it's normally blocked
to keep down telephone solicitors.

Well, there are plenty of people who don't answer blocked phone calls,
reasoning that if someone is concealing their name (which usually is
what's displayed anyway), they aren't someone worth answering. I
suspect that it's especially true for someone who is operating a
"professional/referral" type business like a consulting psychologist.
After all, they probably feel even more strongly about telephone
solicitors, most of whom block their IDs.

BTW, you should get on the national "do not call" list. I did and my
solicitations went from about 10-20 a day to maybe three or four a
week at most.

Frankly, I think this obsession is turning from a source of amusement
to something a bit scary. Obviously, the fact that he is precisely
listed in the Yellow Pages isn't good enough for you. Now you must
CALL the guy? It's already been done, remember?

Dave Weil wrote:


On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:21:49 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925


If I were calling from home it wouldn't showed since it's normally blocked
to keep down telephone solicitors.

Well, there are plenty of people who don't answer blocked phone calls,
reasoning that if someone is concealing their name (which usually is
what's displayed anyway), they aren't someone worth answering. I
suspect that it's especially true for someone who is operating a
"professional/referral" type business like a consulting psychologist.
After all, they probably feel even more strongly about telephone
solicitors, most of whom block their IDs.

BTW, you should get on the national "do not call" list. I did and my
solicitations went from about 10-20 a day to maybe three or four a
week at most.

Frankly, I think this obsession is turning from a source of amusement
to something a bit scary. Obviously, the fact that he is precisely
listed in the Yellow Pages isn't good enough for you. Now you must
CALL the guy? It's already been done, remember?




I think proven liar and stalker McKelvy realizes that his 7 year libel campaign
has been an abject failure, convincing nobody but himself and Krueger of
anything. All it's done is make them look even more foolish and guilty, as
well as motivate all reasonable people to question the validity of anything
they have to say. After all, an individual that would knowingly lie and
fabricate one bizarre statement after another about a person they've never even
met is clearly sociopathic and/or delusional.



Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Dave Weil wrote:


On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:21:49 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925


If I were calling from home it wouldn't showed since it's normally
blocked
to keep down telephone solicitors.

Well, there are plenty of people who don't answer blocked phone calls,
reasoning that if someone is concealing their name (which usually is
what's displayed anyway), they aren't someone worth answering. I
suspect that it's especially true for someone who is operating a
"professional/referral" type business like a consulting psychologist.
After all, they probably feel even more strongly about telephone
solicitors, most of whom block their IDs.

BTW, you should get on the national "do not call" list. I did and my
solicitations went from about 10-20 a day to maybe three or four a
week at most.

Frankly, I think this obsession is turning from a source of amusement
to something a bit scary. Obviously, the fact that he is precisely
listed in the Yellow Pages isn't good enough for you. Now you must
CALL the guy? It's already been done, remember?




I think proven liar and stalker McKelvy realizes that his 7 year libel
campaign
has been an abject failure,

INsofar as they are figmaents of your imagination, yes.

convincing nobody but himself and Krueger of
anything.

The only thing I've been trying to convince myself of is you being who you
say you are.

All it's done is make them look even more foolish and guilty, as
well as motivate all reasonable people to question the validity of
anything
they have to say.

Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly reasonable.

After all, an individual that would knowingly lie and
fabricate one bizarre statement after another about a person they've never
even
met is clearly sociopathic and/or delusional.



Then why do you keep doing it?

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...
:
: Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly reasonable.

Kinda new in this bar. Can you define or list the usual gang of RAO
thugs ..
one likes to know on what end of the bar to sip the martini's, eh
Rudy

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:49:47 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

Is that the 5033 number?

You tell me.

That's the only Bruce Richman Phd. I can find.

s******

This is starting to get kinda fun.

Dave Weil wrote:


On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:49:47 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

Is that the 5033 number?

You tell me.

That's the only Bruce Richman Phd. I can find.

s******

This is starting to get kinda fun.


At the risk of sounding insensitive, I've got to admit that certain types of
bizarre behavior found among the mentally ill can be kind of funny at times.



Bruce J. Richman

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:49:47 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

Probably caller ID. If you tried to call me, I wouldn't answer either.

How would you know it was me?

Have someone explain cller ID to you sometime.