On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:24:39 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

It's simply to prevent him from claiming I edited some crucial piece of info
as he hasd done in the past.

Oh, c'mon. surely you can edit out everything but the point that you
are contesting, especially when you're only contesting a timy portion
of the post.

Dave Weil wrote:


On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:24:39 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

It's simply to prevent him from claiming I edited some crucial piece of info

as he hasd done in the past.

Oh, c'mon. surely you can edit out everything but the point that you
are contesting, especially when you're only contesting a timy portion
of the post.


It's well known that compulsive liar McKelvy imitates and worships the posting
style of Krueger, who regularly engages in deceptive deletions of content in
posts. He does this tp be able to quote them out of context and ddistort
and'or misrepresent what the poster he's attacking has said. It's also a
convenient way for both of them try and hide facts that contradict thier
routine false statements.



Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Dave Weil wrote:


On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:24:39 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

It's simply to prevent him from claiming I edited some crucial piece of
info

as he hasd done in the past.

Oh, c'mon. surely you can edit out everything but the point that you
are contesting, especially when you're only contesting a timy portion
of the post.


It's well known that compulsive liar McKelvy imitates and worships the
posting
style of Krueger, who regularly engages in deceptive deletions of content
in
posts. He does this tp be able to quote them out of context and ddistort
and'or misrepresent what the poster he's attacking has said. It's also a
convenient way for both of them try and hide facts that contradict thier
routine false statements.


See what I mean? If I edit out things He complains, if I don't others
complain.

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:24:39 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

It's simply to prevent him from claiming I edited some crucial piece of
info
as he hasd done in the past.

Oh, c'mon. surely you can edit out everything but the point that you
are contesting, especially when you're only contesting a timy portion
of the post.

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:24:39 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

It's simply to prevent him from claiming I edited some crucial piece of
info
as he hasd done in the past.

Oh, c'mon. surely you can edit out everything but the point that you
are contesting, especially when you're only contesting a timy portion
of the post.

Then he'll just accuse me of deceptive editing again.

Riddle me this: Since BJ won't say where he lives or works and since I've
called the only B.J. Richman anywhere near Miami, that I could find a
listing for, and if we are assuming that he has caller I.D., which shows the
number of the person calling. Can we get him to confirm he the same person
as the one I've called? Do you think that's asking to much? He doesn't
have to talk to me just confirm I got the right number.

Wanna make any predictions?