"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
l.earthlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.



He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate
deception
and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest
fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He
and
Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie
marathons.



What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that
Mike McKelvey can't understand?



Well, there are seveal possible explanations for his bizarre and - as
we
can
all expect - dishonest behavior.

(1) Seeing an unprovoked personal attack from his controller, Krueger,
his
conditioned Attack & Lie Responce in Support of Krueger (TM) kicked in
and
totally blocked out all other alternatives - such as a rational
response.


Says the guy that makes unprovoked personal attack in a thread about the
death of Julian Hirsch.



A blatant lie.


(2) The title of your thread and the questoni

Is that Italian?


Evasive grasping at typographical error because of inability to respond
honestly noted. Slavish imitation of role model Krueger's juvenile
typographical error citing noted.



were both clearly stated.
Responding directly to it would have interfered with Mikey's
reputation
for
blatant disregard for the facts in a post.

I did respond when I read it. I've seen a question about a recording,
I've
not listened to it.


You also engaged in an unprovoked personal attack against me rather then
answer
the question and stick to the facts.

I did? Oh dear me, I might start becoming like you.

Of course, your mindless and slavish need
to ingratiate yourself with Krueger is well known to all of us.

I think all you have to do to ingratiate yourself to Arny is accept that
the
laws of physics are still intact.

(3) Honest questions - when directed to McKelvy - don't get honest
answers.


Liewise yourself.

And honest questions about why you posted a personal attack in the
Julian
Hirsch thread get no answer at all.



Since the premise was dishonest and based on lies,

The premise was why did you make a personal attack on Arny in the Julian
Hirsch thread. You did so, now explain why.

the question was equally
dishonest and not worthy of response.

IOW you got caught and don't want to admit to the fact that it was tacky
and
pointless.


Here's an honest question for you, liar. Why haven't you at least
asked
for
an investigation by the legal authorities in Florida of the person you
have
repeatedly alleged may be impersonating a psychologist named Dr.
Richman?

Because the most likely scenario is that Dr. Richman is a harmless gnat.

I would think both the authorities and the real Dr. Richman would like
to
see
this "impersonator" prosecuted for engaging in behavior that is clearly
against
the law.

If I'm doiing you such an injustice why have you not taken steps to get me
charged with something, or is denigrationg an asshole on USENET not a
crime?

Where do you live, where's your practice?










Well, other than seeing his reponse to my post, I haven't bothered to read
it.
As usual, I can safely assume it contained a series of lies and juvenile
insults. Therefore, rather than waste my time and that of other RAO
readers,
I' re reproducing a response written in April, 2004 in response to
McKelvy's
bull**** about my background. Note that it directly refutrs just about
all of
his idiotic attempts to continue his lies and libel campaign.


In response to proven libeler and pathological liar McKelvy's continued
repetition of false claims, coupled with a laughable "demand" that I
produce
evidence that he has a lengthy history of lying and libeling me on RAO, I
decided to call this cretin's pathetic attempts to dodge responsibility
for his
despicable behavior with the following response.

A couple of observations, should be added re. my post of April 9, 2004,
which
is reproduced below:

1. In the first example of libel by McKelvy which I cite, he initiated
libel
thread with the title "Richman's ethical lapses". It is worth noting that
he
does not and CAN NOT list any. So obviously, his sole purpose was to
libel and
defame another person. I chose to ignore this piece of unprovoked garbage
which he initiated. As did every other RAO poster.

2. As of the time of this writing, 4:00 PM EST on 4/10/04, the proven
liar and
libeler Mckelvy has failed to respond directly to the post reproduced
below.
It is obvious that his latest bluff/bull**** has been called and he's been
exposed for what most on RAO already have known him to be for a long
time - a
hatemongering, bitter, delusional liar and character assassin whose
primary
purpose in posting on RAO is to smear others with whatever lies, libelous
false
claims and libelous labels of other people his diseased, delusional "mind"
(such as it is in its primitive state) can regurgitate.

3. Proven liar and libeler McKelvy has been challenged to submit his
delusional
"complaints" about my professional and ethical behavior (about which he
has
admitted he knows nothing - one of the few true things he has ever said)
to the
appropriate licensing board in my state. Of course, he has failed to do
so,
most likely because he knows that he's full of it, and will be sued by me
after
he does so.

4. I could have provided many more examples of McKelvy's compulsive lies
and
libels against me, but felt that for now, 2 would be sufficient. Pending
the
results of Mr. Wheeler's case, and in consultation with my attornies, I
may
elect to pursue legal action against him and use a quite impressive and
lengthy
file of false, libelous claims he has made against me as evidence. No
doubt,
he will "help" by continuing to provide further evidence that can be used
against him.

5. I apologize for the lengfh of this post in advance, but in
consideration of
McKelvy's obvious compulsive, pathological responses which almost always
consist of further lies and libelous false statements about me, this
response
is IMHO, quite appropriate.

6. This response will be the one used in the future to deal with
McKelvy's
subsequent sociopathic, delusional, false, and libelous personal attacks
against me.
-----------------------------------------------------------


Mike McKelvy continues to avoid providing proof of his slander:

From: (Bruce J. Richman)

Mike McKelvy wrote:


From: (Bruce J. Richman)


deletion of further lies in which McKelvy tries to avoid responsibility
for
lengthy history of lying and committing slander re. my credentials,
training
and professional activities.

This despicable scumbag, after first admitting he knows nothing about my
credentials, training and professional activities, then laughingly trying
to
claim his slanderous bull**** was merely opinions, and now attempting to
deny
all responsibility for his ridiculous lies ? insults the intelligence of
all
RAO readers.

His requests for "proof" ? like all his imbecilic grunts and mutterings
concerning me ? are a joke. As is his very RAO existence.

While he continue to deny slandering me, and requesting proof, his
credibility
remains zero (except perhaps, in the eyes of his hero, Krueger).

His false claims re. my professional background are a matter of Google
record,
and virtually all RAO readers at all familiar with this sociopath's
imbecilic
bull**** re. my background know this to be the case.

Since he's been purveying lies about me, he needs to present the proof
for
all
his nonsense, or stick his head further up the orifice in which it's
obviously
been inserted for so long.




Bruce J. Richman



repetitive bull**** similar to that pruveyed over a 6 year period by this
pathological liar and proven slanderer deleted

For this pathological liar, all false claims about another person's
training,
credentials, professional experience, etc. ? are only "opinions" ? a piece
of
bull**** nobody other than this lying cretin believes.

Here's just one example of his slander:


http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...thbp0ffk2j625%
40corp.supernews.com&rnum=7&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DMcKelvy%2Band%2Blicensing%2
Bboard%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF?8%26sa%3DN%26t ab%3Dwg

Note that this was an attack thread started by McKelvy, in which this
fool,
reproduces the Ethical Code followed by psychologists.

Note the slanderous title of the post.

Note also the question, this proven slanderer asks in the last line after
quoting the Ethical code.

Needless to say, this pathological liar has no evidence that I have ever
committed any ethics violations, and in fact his use of the title of this
thread, to which nobody responded, constitutes slander.

I have directly challenged this despicable cretin and proven liar to
submit any

complaints he has to the Florida State Licensing Board. He has refused to
do
so, because he knows he's been lying about me for 6 years.

This fool, in a conversation with Scott Wheeler commiitted another blatant
lie:


"The person claiming to be B.J. Richman, a Ph.D is a fake as should be
obvious to anybody with more than 2 active neurons."

The reference for this is
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...igk0458h89%40c
orp.supernews.com

Now, no doubt, proven liar and slanderer McKelvy will claim he's just
voiced an
opinion, but defamation and libel of a licensed psychologist, whose
identity is

acknowledged and has been proven on RAO to the satisfaction of virtually
all
conscious lifeforms with the exception of McKelvy and Krueger, is *not* an
opinion.

His lies are a matter of public record, and these 2 examples are just a
few of
many that could be easily obtained from the Google record.

He has also deliberately ignored the following evidence presented on
Google:

"The University of Texas at Austin, has long had one of the most highly
regarded
doctoral programs in Clinical Psychology in the United States (top 10
ranking). Since I had the good fortune to have a very good record in my
Master's propgram at Clinical Psychology at Boston College,l and perhaps
becauise I hit the 99th %ile on the Graduate Record Examination (Verbal
Portion) and the 99th %ile examination on the Psychology Acvhievement
section,
I had the rather odd experience of being actively recruited by schools to
which
I applied. (I had always thought this just happened to jocks, but I was
wrong). One unforgettable day, I got a call from the head of the Clinical
Psychology program at the University of Texas, a Dr. James Bieri, who
basically
said "We've seen your application, we'd like you to come here, and we're
prepared to make you a nice offfer". That nice offer, which I accepted,
turned
out to be a NIMH (National Institutes of Mental Health) Traineeship in
Clinical
Psychology, for an unlimited period of time, with no strings attached
other
than that I meet the academic requirements of the program (maintain a B
average).. It took care of all my expenses (tuition, room & board, books,
etc.) and gave me s small stipend to live on as well. Some of my
classmates
congratulated me on my good fortune (many of them had to accept teaching
assistantships to help pay their bills, while all I had to do was hit the
books). The program turned out to be a real meatgrinder (as one of my
classmates put it). It made my undergraduate program at an elite "small
Ivy
League school" (Bowdoin College) and my M.A. program seem like
kindergarten.
Almost everybody in my entering class of about 20 had either a Phi
Beta Kappa key, was published and or came from Ivy League schools or
places
like U. of Chicago, Stanford or Berkeley. Of the 20 who started the
program,
only 5 of us survived and got our doctorates. It took not only a high
degree
of intelligence and perserverance, but also a large ability to deal with
the
stress of knowing that you were in a program with a very high attrition
rate
and some professors, who frankly, until you got to the 2nd year and had
"paid
your dues", didn't give a damn if you survived or not. I'll never forgot
one
of my Statistics professors who used to get up in front of the class and
say
"Even if you don't make it through graduate school, you can still be a
good
citizen""

and the following:

"I was accepted for an Internship in Clnical
Psycnology at Massachusetts General Hospital, which I accepted and
completed"

and the followiong:

"After obtaining my doctorate, I was
also accepted for postdoctoral training at Temple Medical School,
Department of
Psychiary, Institute for Behavior Therapy, in Philadelphia. I enjoyed my
time
there had learned a lot under the supervision of the late Dr. Joseph
Wolpe, a
world famous psychiatrist who is considered to be one of the founders of
Cognitive?Behavioral Therapy, the predominant type of therapy now
practiced by
most psychologists and psychiatrists (aside from pharmacotherapy). "

The above quotes are from a post written in response to Howard Ferstler,
another well known zealot, pathological liar, and purveyor of libel on RAO
(not
surprisingly, frequently defended by Krueger, McKelvy's role model).

The complete post (and thread) can be referened at:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...0203225629.076
19.00000418%40mb?mg.aol.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DFerstler%2Band%2BRichman%2B
and%2BUniversity%2Bof%2BTexas%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26 ie%3DUTF?8%26sa%3DN%26ta
b%3Dwg

So McKelvy's slandeous claims about quacks, frauds, and fakes are nothing
more
than the delusional, sociopathic rantings and repetitions of a proven liar
and
libeler.

No doubt he will claim that this is all made up, but the only thing made
up are
his nonsensical departures from reality which pollute RAO whenever he
continues
to libel me and others.

One further fact, which I may or may not be able to prove since it
happened a
long time ago, and I don't know if the radio station keeps records. And I
challenge the cretin and liar, McKelvy, to disprove it ? LOL! :

In about 1976 or 1977, I was employed as the "Psychology Director" of a
private
Cardiac Rehabilitation Center based in Miami, Florida. The center ran a
30?day, interdisciplinary inpatient program for patients who were either
at
high risk for cardiac disease or had already undergone such procedures as
cardiac bypass surgery. My main responsibility was to direct the
behavioral
component of this intensive program (which also involved dieticians,
exercise
physiologists, cardiologists, and RNs). Areas such as stress management,

smoking cessation, behavioral approaches to obesity, etc. were among the
targets that I had to address. One of my other responsibilities was, in
conjunction with the medical director, to promote the program through
various
media appearances in both TV and radio. Two interviews in particular
stand out
in my mind. The first came in the wee hours of the morning in New York
City on
a nationally syndicated program ? "The Long John Nebel Show" (New Yorkers
old
enough may remember this). The second occurred in my home base on the
79th
Street Causeway in Miami Beach at a radio station where Miami's best known
talk
show host (at the time) was carrying forth ? I spent 2 hours being
interviewed
very incisively on the main topic which was "Stress and Heart Disease". I
remember coming away from that interview thinking that the interviewer was
very
sharp and well prepared to really grill me. The name of the radio station
(and
I'm relying on long ago recall was, I believe either WKAT or WIOD). The
name
of the host ? Larry King.

Shortly thereafter, Larry left Miami and the rest is history.

I challenge the proven liar, and libeler, McKelvy to dispute any of these
facts
with any factual evidence he cares to fabricate from the diseased empty
spaces
composing his deluded cranium.

No doubt he will choose to delete most of this post instead.

LOL!!!

(I apologize for appearing to be bragging about past or present
accomplishments, but since this despicable, loudmouthed, unbelievably
stupid,
delusional, libeler and liar decided to completely embarass himself once
again,
it was just too tempting to not assist him in making a fool of himself and
exposing his sociopathic behavior once again).

Nothing more needs to be said about his lies, so when he responds with
more
bull****, I will respond with a standard, previously used, canned response
that
perfectly describes this moron's basic character, motivations, and
irrational
behaviors.

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
(FL PY 2543)



Thanks for once again demonstrating you can't tell the difference between
opinions and lies.