"Joseph Oberlander" wrote in message
news


jak163 wrote:

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:45:47 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


No argument from me. Government has no legitimate claim on anybody's
estate. I suspect this is one of those things that goes back to trying to
screw with the new rich as opposed to the old money families. That's
where our first zoning laws came from, old money families not wanting to
live near new money folks.


Estate taxes are an effort to preserve some semblance of equal
opportunity despite huge inherited fortunes. They should probably be
more like 100 percent to accomplish that purpose.

But - there is no such thing as equal opportunity as long as
people exist, since while all people may be created equal in
terms of rights, they are not in terms of ability.

It's a huge land-grab by the government.

Q: what countries do NOT have a death tax?

Who cares how many people do the same wrong thing?

The death tax is not for the purpose you describe. That's just the excuse
they use to keep it. If it did what you think it's supposed to, why are the
Kennedy's, Kerry's, Bush's and Rockefeller's still rich.

The simple fact is this tax does harm and no good at all.

Michael McKelvy wrote:

The death tax is not for the purpose you describe. That's just the excuse
they use to keep it. If it did what you think it's supposed to, why are the
Kennedy's, Kerry's, Bush's and Rockefeller's still rich.

The simple fact is this tax does harm and no good at all.

Preaching to the choir. I wanted to know what countries don't do
this so that I know where to go when I get old - to keep their
grubby hands off of it.

Michael McKelvy wrote:

The death tax is not for the purpose you describe.
That's just the excuse they use to keep it. If it did
what you think it's supposed to, why are the Kennedy's,
Kerry's, Bush's and Rockefeller's still rich.

The simple fact is this tax does harm and no good at all.

If this tax does so much harm, how did they all remain so rich?

--
Law of Storms

"My God, it's full of stars..."