Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Michael McKelvy
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Fella" wrote in message
...
paul packer wrote:

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:


paul packer wrote:

On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:




And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this
mikey boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than". .

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.



You mean your mother tounge, don't you?


No, I mean tongue. Listen, you be gettin on my nerves boi.. I be slappin
you silly if yous gunna keep this up.

Anyways .


Anyways????????????// Argh! Anyway.

.. I do not pretend to know .. or rather, I do not deem that
thousands of different equipment all over the world are "malfunctioning"
based on crude, borg-like, limited preconceptions and misconceptions.


How about base on numerous meansurements and listnening comparisons?

And this about equipment I've never even heard, or heard of (!) much less
measured.

If I would boast such god like qualities, well, perhaps then I shouldn't
be making typos either. Now, taking spare time work and writing a quick


It's not God like abilities, it's science.

two or three articles here, just for the sake of contribution, I make a
typo here and there in the process, I repeat the question: is that asking
"to much" ???

Way too much.

There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours, figures...
since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore), the patronizing idiot
krooger, etc, who think that equipped with some pink noise and an
oscilloscope they can put out instructions as to what a standart CD
player, amp, lamp cord speaker cable, etc, should be. In the


Thanks for demonstrating that facts mean nothing to you. Proof! Who needs
proof?

process these fruitcakes call other people "delusional" etc, and act
god-like.


It's not acting God like to understnad the thresholds of human hearing and
know that the measurements and listening comparisons mean what they mean.
Properly functioining CD players not designed to alter the Frequency
response from flat, sound the same as each other.

It's just satisfying, and nice, and funny, and OK and lets off some steem
to ridicule such folk.


If you get your kicks by making statements that don't reflect the reality of
the science of audio, it's you who set yourself up for ridicule.




 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DynAudio MW 180 vs MW 170 vs MW 160 Question Rick Car Audio 3 February 17th 04 09:12 PM
Dynaudio 240 GT question again Dave Car Audio 1 January 16th 04 05:33 AM
Jl Audio 15" sub question on models Larry Durst Car Audio 4 September 28th 03 06:15 PM
FS: Clarion ADCS-1 System, Denon DCT-1000R/DCH470, PG ZPA amps and processors, Dynaudio 3 way biamp speakers, Orion EQ/xover, Audio Control 3050 RTA Stephen Narayan Car Audio 4 September 19th 03 05:46 AM
FS: Kicker amp, PG amp and EQ, Dynaudio speakers, Phase Linear Aliante mids and Alpine/Dynaudio tweeters Stephen Narayan Car Audio 4 July 14th 03 06:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:40 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"