paul packer wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:



And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than".
.

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:

paul packer wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:



And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than".
.

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.

You mean your mother tounge, don't you?

paul packer wrote:

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:


paul packer wrote:

On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:




And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this mikey
boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than".
.

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.


You mean your mother tounge, don't you?

No, I mean tongue. Listen, you be gettin on my nerves boi.. I be slappin
you silly if yous gunna keep this up.

Anyways .. I do not pretend to know .. or rather, I do not deem that
thousands of different equipment all over the world are "malfunctioning"
based on crude, borg-like, limited preconceptions and misconceptions.
And this about equipment I've never even heard, or heard of (!) much
less measured.

If I would boast such god like qualities, well, perhaps then I shouldn't
be making typos either. Now, taking spare time work and writing a quick
two or three articles here, just for the sake of contribution, I make a
typo here and there in the process, I repeat the question: is that
asking "to much" ???

There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours,
figures... since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore), the
patronizing idiot krooger, etc, who think that equipped with some pink
noise and an oscilloscope they can put out instructions as to what a
standart CD player, amp, lamp cord speaker cable, etc, should be. In the
process these fruitcakes call other people "delusional" etc, and act
god-like.

It's just satisfying, and nice, and funny, and OK and lets off some
steem to ridicule such folk.

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 13:43:23 +0200, Fella wrote:

There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours,
figures... since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore)

There's some interesting logic lurking here. In what way do I deserve
to be lumped with Ferstler, McKelvy and Krueger? In what way does my
being 'some sort of a bore' (whatever that may mean) preclude my
writing an 'article' (whatever that may be)?

paul packer wrote:
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 13:43:23 +0200, Fella wrote:


There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours,
figures... since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore)


There's some interesting logic lurking here. In what way do I deserve
to be lumped with Ferstler, McKelvy and Krueger?

Like I said I haven't read any of the *articles* that you might have
posted on RAO up to now.

But went through some 10-15 of your articles just now, and found you to
be vain, smug, patronizing, argumentative, and mostly demogogic. your
vain, patronizing attitude and the way you throw fished-from-a-thesaurus
words around indicate that you are after some sort of a compensation for
your "exceptional mediocrity" (oxymoron? No, not inyour case.) ...

All this makes you a bit of a bore, a some sort of a bore, that is, you
*are* boring, yes, no doubt about that, but you make it hard for
sensible people to pin you down. But yes, you *can* be "lumped" with the
ferstler, krooger, etc, bunch, since you are, in the end, a bore, read:
boooooooriiing..

You don't have wood for ears though.

In what way does my
being 'some sort of a bore' (whatever that may mean)

Read above. And dully snap back with some snappy question for an answer,
thank you.


preclude my
writing an 'article' (whatever that may be)?

An article is what one posts on a newsgroup in the usenet. Now, if you
would like more clarification and definitions as to what might be a
"newsgroup", a "post", or the "usenet" etc, then I suggest you dully
snap back with a smug little question, clipping all else essential and
quoting some minor detail, as in: "usenet, do enlighten us fella, what
might be this usenet?"

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 17:01:59 +0200, Fella wrote:

paul packer wrote:
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 13:43:23 +0200, Fella wrote:


There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours,
figures... since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore)


There's some interesting logic lurking here. In what way do I deserve
to be lumped with Ferstler, McKelvy and Krueger?

Like I said I haven't read any of the *articles* that you might have
posted on RAO up to now.

But went through some 10-15 of your articles just now, and found you to
be vain, smug, patronizing, argumentative, and mostly demogogic. your
vain, patronizing attitude and the way you throw fished-from-a-thesaurus
words around indicate that you are after some sort of a compensation for
your "exceptional mediocrity" (oxymoron? No, not inyour case.) ...

Well, it's definitely time for Mr. Richman to be brought in here to
see how well your amateur psychology stands up to scrutiny. I'm
astonished you can glean so much from a few posts on RAO, since I've
been living with myself for 58 years and I hadn't yet learned all
that. I'm extremely grateful for your psycholanalysis. What is the
fee, please? (And don't be modest. You deserve a just reward).

By the way, you said "vain" and "patronizing" twice. And I'll have you
know my mediocrity is in no way "exceptional". It is, unfortunately,
quite commonplace.

All this makes you a bit of a bore, a some sort of a bore, that is, you
*are* boring, yes, no doubt about that, but you make it hard for
sensible people to pin you down.

Well, I don't know, you seem to be doing a pretty good job so far in
your own opinion. Do please continue.

But yes, you *can* be "lumped" with the
ferstler, krooger, etc, bunch, since you are, in the end, a bore, read:
boooooooriiing..

Now, now, don't be boring and repeat things over and over.

You don't have wood for ears though.

Thank you. But how do you know?

In what way does my
being 'some sort of a bore' (whatever that may mean)

Read above. And dully snap back with some snappy question for an answer,
thank you.

Is that an instruction or an expectation?

preclude my
writing an 'article' (whatever that may be)?

An article is what one posts on a newsgroup in the usenet.

I thought that was a post. Like this one. I thought articles were what
one submitted to magazines.

Now, if you
would like more clarification and definitions as to what might be a
"newsgroup", a "post", or the "usenet" etc, then I suggest you dully
snap back with a smug little question,

Nope. Think I'll just check my thesaurus. The one I fish words from
all the time.

clipping all else essential and
quoting some minor detail, as in: "usenet, do enlighten us fella, what
might be this usenet?"

Please don't write my dialogue for me. And certainly not in that
peculiar Huckleberry Finn dialect.

paul packer wrote:
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 17:01:59 +0200, Fella wrote:

since I've
been living with myself for 58 years and I hadn't yet learned all
that.

It sometimes takes an outsider to see the insides, if you get what I
mean. No but wait. You wouldn't get what I mean. Ok.




Well, I don't know,


Well, at least you know _that_. So there is some potential.


you seem to be doing a pretty good job so far in
your own opinion. Do please continue.

Well thank you masseh, for the permission granted.


Now, now, don't be boring and repeat things over and over.

Ok so when'd I say I was perfect?



Thank you. But how do you know?


You can hear the difference between a rotel, was it, and a marantz or
another. Read some of the *articles* you *posted*, remember?


Is that an instruction or an expectation?


Both. I am giving you some medicine, feel free to take it anyway you
want it.


I thought that was a post. Like this one. I thought articles were what
one submitted to magazines.


Well back to the old thesaurus for you then.


Nope. Think I'll just check my thesaurus. The one I fish words from
all the time.


Ok, and, yes, what a surprise that would be.



Please don't write my dialogue for me. And certainly not in that
peculiar Huckleberry Finn dialect.

Sorry me then, I should have fished a fancy word for "enlighten" from
your thesaurus. Ok, lets see:

"acculturate, acquaint, cultivate, edify, educate, ennoble, enrich,
foster, help forward, indoctrinate, inform, instruct" .. So, pick one.

"Fella" wrote in message
...
paul packer wrote:

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:


paul packer wrote:

On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:




And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this
mikey boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than". .

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.


You mean your mother tounge, don't you?

No, I mean tongue. Listen, you be gettin on my nerves boi.. I be slappin
you silly if yous gunna keep this up.

Anyways .

Anyways????????????// Argh! Anyway.

.. I do not pretend to know .. or rather, I do not deem that
thousands of different equipment all over the world are "malfunctioning"
based on crude, borg-like, limited preconceptions and misconceptions.

How about base on numerous meansurements and listnening comparisons?

And this about equipment I've never even heard, or heard of (!) much less
measured.

If I would boast such god like qualities, well, perhaps then I shouldn't
be making typos either. Now, taking spare time work and writing a quick

It's not God like abilities, it's science.

two or three articles here, just for the sake of contribution, I make a
typo here and there in the process, I repeat the question: is that asking
"to much" ???

Way too much.

There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours, figures...
since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore), the patronizing idiot
krooger, etc, who think that equipped with some pink noise and an
oscilloscope they can put out instructions as to what a standart CD
player, amp, lamp cord speaker cable, etc, should be. In the

Thanks for demonstrating that facts mean nothing to you. Proof! Who needs
proof?

process these fruitcakes call other people "delusional" etc, and act
god-like.


It's not acting God like to understnad the thresholds of human hearing and
know that the measurements and listening comparisons mean what they mean.
Properly functioining CD players not designed to alter the Frequency
response from flat, sound the same as each other.

It's just satisfying, and nice, and funny, and OK and lets off some steem
to ridicule such folk.

If you get your kicks by making statements that don't reflect the reality of
the science of audio, it's you who set yourself up for ridicule.

I usually do not top post. But for an exceptional "get-a-brain-moran"
such as yourself, I'll make an exception: Your science is limited, your
understanding of the depths of the human ear perception is limited, your
measurements are limited, your so called listening tests are limited, a
flat frequency response does not even begin to tell the story when it
comes to *music* (NOT pink noise) .. etc.

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" .. Sheeeeeeesh,
I should get a brain..




Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
...

paul packer wrote:


On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:



paul packer wrote:


On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:





And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this
mikey boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than". .

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.


You mean your mother tounge, don't you?

No, I mean tongue. Listen, you be gettin on my nerves boi.. I be slappin
you silly if yous gunna keep this up.

Anyways .


Anyways????????????// Argh! Anyway.

. I do not pretend to know .. or rather, I do not deem that

thousands of different equipment all over the world are "malfunctioning"
based on crude, borg-like, limited preconceptions and misconceptions.


How about base on numerous meansurements and listnening comparisons?


And this about equipment I've never even heard, or heard of (!) much less
measured.

If I would boast such god like qualities, well, perhaps then I shouldn't
be making typos either. Now, taking spare time work and writing a quick


It's not God like abilities, it's science.


two or three articles here, just for the sake of contribution, I make a
typo here and there in the process, I repeat the question: is that asking
"to much" ???


Way too much.


There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours, figures...
since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore), the patronizing idiot
krooger, etc, who think that equipped with some pink noise and an
oscilloscope they can put out instructions as to what a standart CD
player, amp, lamp cord speaker cable, etc, should be. In the


Thanks for demonstrating that facts mean nothing to you. Proof! Who needs
proof?


process these fruitcakes call other people "delusional" etc, and act
god-like.



It's not acting God like to understnad the thresholds of human hearing and
know that the measurements and listening comparisons mean what they mean.
Properly functioining CD players not designed to alter the Frequency
response from flat, sound the same as each other.


It's just satisfying, and nice, and funny, and OK and lets off some steem
to ridicule such folk.


If you get your kicks by making statements that don't reflect the reality of
the science of audio, it's you who set yourself up for ridicule.

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 10:43:25 +0200, Fella wrote:


I usually do not top post. But for an exceptional "get-a-brain-moran"
such as yourself, I'll make an exception: Your science is limited, your
understanding of the depths of the human ear perception is limited, your
measurements are limited, your so called listening tests are limited, a
flat frequency response does not even begin to tell the story when it
comes to *music* (NOT pink noise) .. etc.

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" .. Sheeeeeeesh,
I should get a brain..

His name is McKelvy, not Moran.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Don Pearce wrote:
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 10:43:25 +0200, Fella wrote:


I usually do not top post. But for an exceptional "get-a-brain-moran"
such as yourself, I'll make an exception: Your science is limited, your
understanding of the depths of the human ear perception is limited, your
measurements are limited, your so called listening tests are limited, a
flat frequency response does not even begin to tell the story when it
comes to *music* (NOT pink noise) .. etc.

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" .. Sheeeeeeesh,
I should get a brain..


His name is McKelvy, not Moran.


The depth of your observational and perceptional skills never cease to
amaze.

What _I_ am observing is that borgs are gathering around, teaming up,
protecting each other.

Fella wrote:

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" .. Sheeeeeeesh,
I should get a brain..

If you got-a-brain you would know-how-to-spell the word moron.

Ian Molton wrote:
Fella wrote:

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" ..
Sheeeeeeesh, I should get a brain..


If you got-a-brain you would know-how-to-spell the word moron.

Another DUH!bya bush supporter pounding his chest?

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 15:14:23 +0000, Ian Molton wrote:

Fella wrote:

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" .. Sheeeeeeesh,
I should get a brain..

If you got-a-brain you would know-how-to-spell the word moron.

But you gotta remember that his surname is Tio.....
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering