On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 19:50:02 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

I mean, as if "Republican supporter" wasn't a big enough CLUE to point
out that someone favours misleading, inaccurate campaigns.
You inference that the Kerry campaign is somehow not misleading doesn't pass
the smell test.

How many lies told by John Kerry have caused soldiers and civilians to
die, exactly?

I didn't infer the Kerry campaign is "somehow not misleading". What on
earth makes you think I'm a Democrat supporter?

She claims that she never discussed politics with
students and the picture was with other presidents and that there was no
endorsement, just a picture.
Great, she will have sued the school for libel then, won't she? Won't
she?
Er...
A little early to tell.

Well, she'd have at least had a go back in the papers about the
school's response, wouldn't she? Wouldn't she?
Er...

--
pete [at] ¦ "I was so upset
horseshoe ¦ that I cried
[hyphen] ¦ all the way to
inn [dot] ¦ the chip-shop"
co [dot] uk¦ - Jilted John

"Peter Thomas" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 19:50:02 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

I mean, as if "Republican supporter" wasn't a big enough CLUE to point
out that someone favours misleading, inaccurate campaigns.
You inference that the Kerry campaign is somehow not misleading doesn't
pass
the smell test.

How many lies told by John Kerry have caused soldiers and civilians to
die, exactly?


The oines he told in1971, about knowledge of American atrrocities in Viet
Nam,
had a terrible effect upon POW's who had to listen to the tapes of these
statements
plyed by their North Vietnames captors. So yes, Kohn Kerry's lies DID cause
soldiers to die.

On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 18:43:33 -0400, "Clyde Slick"
wrote:

I mean, as if "Republican supporter" wasn't a big enough CLUE to point
out that someone favours misleading, inaccurate campaigns.
You inference that the Kerry campaign is somehow not misleading doesn't
pass
the smell test.
How many lies told by John Kerry have caused soldiers and civilians to
die, exactly?
The oines he told in1971, about knowledge of American atrrocities in Viet
Nam,

There were American atrocities in Vietnam. Your point?

had a terrible effect upon POW's who had to listen to the tapes of these
statements plyed by their North Vietnames captors.

That's America's fault for committing the atrocities.

So yes, Kohn Kerry's lies DID cause soldiers to die.

How many?

a) 4,000 or more.
b) Less than 4,000.

--
pete [at] ¦ "I was so upset
horseshoe ¦ that I cried
[hyphen] ¦ all the way to
inn [dot] ¦ the chip-shop"
co [dot] uk¦ - Jilted John

"Peter Thomas" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 19:50:02 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

I mean, as if "Republican supporter" wasn't a big enough CLUE to point
out that someone favours misleading, inaccurate campaigns.
You inference that the Kerry campaign is somehow not misleading doesn't
pass
the smell test.

How many lies told by John Kerry have caused soldiers and civilians to
die, exactly?

Impossible to tell. Nobody knows how soon the N. Viet Namese would have
surrendered if it weren't for Kerry and his fellow travelers.


I didn't infer the Kerry campaign is "somehow not misleading". What on
earth makes you think I'm a Democrat supporter?

Generally when one is bashing one party they support the other. It seemed a
fair guess. Sorry if I got it wrong.

She claims that she never discussed politics with
students and the picture was with other presidents and that there was no
endorsement, just a picture.
Great, she will have sued the school for libel then, won't she? Won't
she?
Er...
A little early to tell.

Well, she'd have at least had a go back in the papers about the
school's response, wouldn't she? Wouldn't she?
Er...

It depends on whether or not the school board is telling the truth or just
covering their ass. I'm not conviced either way. If she's a crackpot they
have every right to sack her, however, if her side is true..............

--

On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 06:22:32 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

I mean, as if "Republican supporter" wasn't a big enough CLUE to point
out that someone favours misleading, inaccurate campaigns.
You inference that the Kerry campaign is somehow not misleading doesn't
pass
the smell test.
How many lies told by John Kerry have caused soldiers and civilians to
die, exactly?
Impossible to tell. Nobody knows how soon the N. Viet Namese would have
surrendered if it weren't for Kerry and his fellow travelers.

Kerry lost you lot the Vietnam war? Is this truly what you are saying?

I didn't infer the Kerry campaign is "somehow not misleading". What on
earth makes you think I'm a Democrat supporter?
Generally when one is bashing one party they support the other. It seemed a
fair guess. Sorry if I got it wrong.

Well, I can trot out the old "when you assume..." cliche.

I don't like Kerry. I don't like the Democrats. I didn't like Gore -
the "inventor of the internet". I laughed at Clinton when he trotted
out "I did not have sexual relations with that woman".

But, when you think about it, claiming to invent the internet, and
cheating on your wife, is nowhere near as harmful and as dangerous as
sending over 4,000 US soldiers to their deaths so you can stay in
office and keep your oil corp buddies rich.

As Michael Moore says, it's simple Dumb vs Dumber.

(Please write back saying "Michael Moore is a damned whining pussy
liberal who has millions of dollars, what a hypocrite", as if Michael
Moore ever stated that legitimately earning money was a bad thing.)

She claims that she never discussed politics with
students and the picture was with other presidents and that there was no
endorsement, just a picture.
Great, she will have sued the school for libel then, won't she? Won't
she?
Er...
A little early to tell.
Well, she'd have at least had a go back in the papers about the
school's response, wouldn't she? Wouldn't she?
Er...
It depends on whether or not the school board is telling the truth or just
covering their ass. I'm not conviced either way. If she's a crackpot they
have every right to sack her, however, if her side is true..............

Erm, considering the FACT that the principal couldn't sack her even if
he wanted to...

--
pete [at] ¦ "I was so upset
horseshoe ¦ that I cried
[hyphen] ¦ all the way to
inn [dot] ¦ the chip-shop"
co [dot] uk¦ - Jilted John

"Peter Thomas" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 06:22:32 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

I mean, as if "Republican supporter" wasn't a big enough CLUE to point
out that someone favours misleading, inaccurate campaigns.
You inference that the Kerry campaign is somehow not misleading doesn't
pass
the smell test.
How many lies told by John Kerry have caused soldiers and civilians to
die, exactly?
Impossible to tell. Nobody knows how soon the N. Viet Namese would have
surrendered if it weren't for Kerry and his fellow travelers.

Kerry lost you lot the Vietnam war? Is this truly what you are saying?

I didn't infer the Kerry campaign is "somehow not misleading". What on
earth makes you think I'm a Democrat supporter?
Generally when one is bashing one party they support the other. It seemed
a
fair guess. Sorry if I got it wrong.

Well, I can trot out the old "when you assume..." cliche.

I don't like Kerry. I don't like the Democrats. I didn't like Gore -
the "inventor of the internet". I laughed at Clinton when he trotted
out "I did not have sexual relations with that woman".

But, when you think about it, claiming to invent the internet, and
cheating on your wife, is nowhere near as harmful and as dangerous as
sending over 4,000 US soldiers to their deaths so you can stay in
office and keep your oil corp buddies rich.

How about allowing N. Korea to have nukes?

As Michael Moore says, it's simple Dumb vs Dumber.

Michael Moore is a well documented liar.

(Please write back saying "Michael Moore is a damned whining pussy
liberal who has millions of dollars, what a hypocrite", as if Michael
Moore ever stated that legitimately earning money was a bad thing.)

Irrelevant, he's makes his money by making theings up and calling them
documentaries.

She claims that she never discussed politics with
students and the picture was with other presidents and that there was
no
endorsement, just a picture.
Great, she will have sued the school for libel then, won't she? Won't
she?
Er...
A little early to tell.
Well, she'd have at least had a go back in the papers about the
school's response, wouldn't she? Wouldn't she?
Er...
It depends on whether or not the school board is telling the truth or just
covering their ass. I'm not conviced either way. If she's a crackpot
they
have every right to sack her, however, if her side is true..............

Erm, considering the FACT that the principal couldn't sack her even if
he wanted to...

Yes, the flaw of tenure.

--
pete [at] ¦ "I was so upset
horseshoe ¦ that I cried
[hyphen] ¦ all the way to
inn [dot] ¦ the chip-shop"
co [dot] uk¦ - Jilted John