Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Sep 2004 22:19:42 GMT, "Bob Olhsson" wrote:
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message ... Yet interestingly, DSD was exposed as having a fatal and fundamental flaw, so totally failed as an archival medium, and the hybrid DSD-Wide is now the Sony studio standard. The "fatal and fundamental flaw" had to do with digital signal processing which is utterly irrelevant to archiving! No, it had to do with overload of the ADC, which is pretty darned relevant! It's also debatable that there is any practical problem at all since all analog recordings have this very same "fatal and fundamental flaw," namely that both are not "perfectible" in the future. However, 24/96 PCM vastly outstrips the capability of *any* analogue recording medium, so may reasonably be considered 'adequate' for archiving masters in a way which will allow infinite humbers of submasters with zero degradation. When PCM recording finally gets perfected, maybe we should look at this issue again. It was always perfect in theory, all we lack are perfect ADCs. Meanwhile, I'm not holding my breath just because a bunch of folks who hold patents in PCM technology want to take cheap shots at a technology that recently became part of the public domain. There *are* no patents in the basics of PCM, since it's been in the public domain for *decades*. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sony SACD player | High End Audio | |||
Sound and Vision article on rumors of Sony and SACD | High End Audio | |||
Sony Digital Amps (and SACD) vs. Sony Analog Amps | High End Audio | |||
Is the war over yet? DVD-audio vs SACD | High End Audio | |||
Sony SACD 777ES | High End Audio |