Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Stewart Pinkerton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 24 Sep 2004 15:50:54 GMT, Steven Sullivan wrote:

Chelvam wrote:
Or simply put, DSD made it possible to capture all of what's in the fragile
original master tape.


But PCM can do that too.

Thereafter, you make CD , mp3, DVD-A or even LP...it
means nothing. The re-emergence of rolling Stones in SACD and thereafter in
CD or both simultaneously was pastrly DSD or SACD made it possible to save
what could be lost forever. Or atleast this the story that was told by SACD
white paper.


If you mean, DSD was originally developed as an archiving medium, that's so.


Yet interestingly, DSD was exposed as having a fatal and fundamental
flaw, so totally failed as an archival medium, and the hybrid DSD-Wide
is now the Sony studio standard.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
  #2   Report Post  
Steven Sullivan
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
On 24 Sep 2004 15:50:54 GMT, Steven Sullivan wrote:


Chelvam wrote:
Or simply put, DSD made it possible to capture all of what's in the fragile
original master tape.


But PCM can do that too.

Thereafter, you make CD , mp3, DVD-A or even LP...it
means nothing. The re-emergence of rolling Stones in SACD and thereafter in
CD or both simultaneously was pastrly DSD or SACD made it possible to save
what could be lost forever. Or atleast this the story that was told by SACD
white paper.


If you mean, DSD was originally developed as an archiving medium, that's so.


Yet interestingly, DSD was exposed as having a fatal and fundamental
flaw, so totally failed as an archival medium,


Deutsche Grammaphon, for one, agrees. They archive in PCM.

and the hybrid DSD-Wide
is now the Sony studio standard.



I've left out, too, the whole aspect involving expiration of
CD-related patents as an impetus towards developing a new format....


--
-S
Your a boring little troll. How does it feel? Go blow your bad breath elsewhere.
  #3   Report Post  
Bob Olhsson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...

Yet interestingly, DSD was exposed as having a fatal and fundamental
flaw, so totally failed as an archival medium, and the hybrid DSD-Wide
is now the Sony studio standard.


The "fatal and fundamental flaw" had to do with digital signal processing
which is utterly irrelevant to archiving!

It's also debatable that there is any practical problem at all since all
analog recordings have this very same "fatal and fundamental flaw," namely
that both are not "perfectible" in the future.

When PCM recording finally gets perfected, maybe we should look at this
issue again. Meanwhile, I'm not holding my breath just because a bunch of
folks who hold patents in PCM technology want to take cheap shots at a
technology that recently became part of the public domain.

--
Bob Olhsson Audio Mastery, Nashville TN
Mastering, Audio for Picture, Mix Evaluation and Quality Control
Over 40 years making people sound better than they ever imagined!
615.385.8051 http://www.hyperback.com
  #4   Report Post  
Stewart Pinkerton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 26 Sep 2004 22:19:42 GMT, "Bob Olhsson" wrote:

"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...

Yet interestingly, DSD was exposed as having a fatal and fundamental
flaw, so totally failed as an archival medium, and the hybrid DSD-Wide
is now the Sony studio standard.


The "fatal and fundamental flaw" had to do with digital signal processing
which is utterly irrelevant to archiving!


No, it had to do with overload of the ADC, which is pretty darned
relevant!

It's also debatable that there is any practical problem at all since all
analog recordings have this very same "fatal and fundamental flaw," namely
that both are not "perfectible" in the future.


However, 24/96 PCM vastly outstrips the capability of *any* analogue
recording medium, so may reasonably be considered 'adequate' for
archiving masters in a way which will allow infinite humbers of
submasters with zero degradation.

When PCM recording finally gets perfected, maybe we should look at this
issue again.


It was always perfect in theory, all we lack are perfect ADCs.

Meanwhile, I'm not holding my breath just because a bunch of
folks who hold patents in PCM technology want to take cheap shots at a
technology that recently became part of the public domain.


There *are* no patents in the basics of PCM, since it's been in the
public domain for *decades*.

--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sony SACD player CW High End Audio 1 April 4th 04 12:21 AM
Sound and Vision article on rumors of Sony and SACD randyb High End Audio 3 March 19th 04 05:50 PM
Sony Digital Amps (and SACD) vs. Sony Analog Amps banspeakerports High End Audio 0 February 8th 04 06:18 PM
Is the war over yet? DVD-audio vs SACD langvid High End Audio 60 January 26th 04 09:24 PM
Sony SACD 777ES Mike ahern High End Audio 1 July 6th 03 08:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:18 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"