On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:38:40 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

And you don't think that Mr. Ferstler isn't guilty of "childish
flames", Clyde?

Given the balance of terror around here, why worry about such a nit?

How about your *own* libelous claims against me (which *my* attorney
has on file if I decide to take further action)? Are those excusable?

Given the balance of terror around here, why worry about such a nit?

Why do *you* worry about nits then, if such things are nits?

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:38:40 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

And you don't think that Mr. Ferstler isn't guilty of "childish
flames", Clyde?

Given the balance of terror around here, why worry about such a nit?

How about your *own* libelous claims against me (which *my* attorney
has on file if I decide to take further action)? Are those
excusable?

Given the balance of terror around here, why worry about such a nit?

Why do *you* worry about nits then, if such things are nits?

Because it's so much fun to watch you bozos dance, bozo!

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:02:36 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:38:40 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

And you don't think that Mr. Ferstler isn't guilty of "childish
flames", Clyde?

Given the balance of terror around here, why worry about such a nit?

How about your *own* libelous claims against me (which *my* attorney
has on file if I decide to take further action)? Are those
excusable?

Given the balance of terror around here, why worry about such a nit?

Why do *you* worry about nits then, if such things are nits?

Because it's so much fun to watch you bozos dance, bozo!

So, in other words, all of your pious pronouncements of the past day
or two regarding the state of this newsgroup were just a crock, right?

"dave weil" wrote in message


On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:02:36 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Because it's so much fun to watch you bozos dance, bozo!

So, in other words, all of your pious pronouncements of the past day
or two regarding the state of this newsgroup were just a crock, right?

In other words Weil, I can see this place for what you and your bozo cohorts
have turned in into.

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:28:28 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message


On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:02:36 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Because it's so much fun to watch you bozos dance, bozo!

So, in other words, all of your pious pronouncements of the past day
or two regarding the state of this newsgroup were just a crock, right?

In other words Weil, I can see this place for what you and your bozo cohorts
have turned in into.

I'd counter that it's *you* whose made a mess of this place with all
of your obnoxious trolls. Heck, you've been doing it for more than
half a decade.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:28:28 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message


On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:02:36 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Because it's so much fun to watch you bozos dance, bozo!

So, in other words, all of your pious pronouncements of the past day
or two regarding the state of this newsgroup were just a crock,
right?

In other words Weil, I can see this place for what you and your bozo
cohorts have turned in into.

I'd counter that it's *you* whose made a mess of this place with all
of your obnoxious trolls. Heck, you've been doing it for more than
half a decade.

Weil, the place went downhill a whole lot faster once you, Phillips and
Middius started posting.

Dave Weil wrote:

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:38:40 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

And you don't think that Mr. Ferstler isn't guilty of "childish
flames", Clyde?

Given the balance of terror around here, why worry about such a nit?

How about your *own* libelous claims against me (which *my* attorney
has on file if I decide to take further action)? Are those excusable?

Given the balance of terror around here, why worry about such a nit?

Why do *you* worry about nits then, if such things are nits?







Krueger has been widely acknowledged and proven to be RAO's most hated and
despised poster because of a 7 year history in which his psychotic parnoia has
motivated him to engage in libel, character assassination and numerous
unprovoked personal attacks against many RAO posters. His attempts to mninize
his despicable posting history is a joke - just like he is.

He's clearly out of touch with reality, and unable to distinguish between fact
and fiction. Most of what he posts is the latter.


Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
PY 2543 (Florida)-
Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message



Krueger has been widely acknowledged and proven to be RAO's most
hated and despised poster because of a 7 year history in which his
psychotic parnoia has motivated him to engage in libel, character
assassination and numerous unprovoked personal attacks against many
RAO posters. His attempts to mninize his despicable posting history
is a joke - just like he is.

He's clearly out of touch with reality, and unable to distinguish
between fact and fiction. Most of what he posts is the latter.

Bruce since turnabout is fair play, could you tell us what *parnoia* is?

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:33:51 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message



Krueger has been widely acknowledged and proven to be RAO's most
hated and despised poster because of a 7 year history in which his
psychotic parnoia has motivated him to engage in libel, character
assassination and numerous unprovoked personal attacks against many
RAO posters. His attempts to mninize his despicable posting history
is a joke - just like he is.

He's clearly out of touch with reality, and unable to distinguish
between fact and fiction. Most of what he posts is the latter.

Bruce since turnabout is fair play, could you tell us what *parnoia* is?

It's an "illeagal" spelling.

Dave Weil wrote:


On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:33:51 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message



Krueger has been widely acknowledged and proven to be RAO's most
hated and despised poster because of a 7 year history in which his
psychotic parnoia has motivated him to engage in libel, character
assassination and numerous unprovoked personal attacks against many
RAO posters. His attempts to mninize his despicable posting history
is a joke - just like he is.

He's clearly out of touch with reality, and unable to distinguish
between fact and fiction. Most of what he posts is the latter.

Bruce since turnabout is fair play, could you tell us what *parnoia* is?

It's an "illeagal" spelling.








LOL !!! Very good.

Note that Krueger couldn't help, for once, posting what I've written that
accurately describes his RAO history. Usually he tries to hide it by deceptive
deletions. I guess he thought I'd mind having a typing error pointed out.
Wrong. A small price to pay for familiarizing people once again with Krueger's
history of lies, libel, and deceipt on RAO.

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
PY 2543 (Florida)
Bruce J. Richman