Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I have just finished building my first esl pair which sound nice but as many of you know hasn't got good bass output. So I was thinking of making it a hybrid system utilising a magnetic driver for producing the bass. My problem now is the vast difference between the output of bass driver and esl when fed with the same output signal from amp(big diff in sensitivity). So I want to equalise that as well. I have heard a few things about active crossover and bi-amping but would prefer to do a passive solution at the moment. Any help appreciated. Thanks Manoj |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Manoj wrote:
Hi, I have just finished building my first esl pair which sound nice but as many of you know hasn't got good bass output. So I was thinking of making it a hybrid system utilising a magnetic driver for producing the bass. My problem now is the vast difference between the output of bass driver and esl when fed with the same output signal from amp(big diff in sensitivity). So I want to equalise that as well. I have heard a few things about active crossover and bi-amping but would prefer to do a passive solution at the moment. Any help appreciated. Thanks Manoj It could be possible to damp the esl with series resistors or L-pad, but I suspect the woofer has the highest sensitivity? Its not a good idea to put resistors in series with the woofer. A cheap and good entry-level solution is to get the 110$ Behringer CX2310 active crossover, and some kind of power amp to drive the woofer, which dont have to be all that expensive. This solution would probably be better than any passive crossover. Regards, Stig Erik Tangen |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Manoj wrote:
Hi, I have just finished building my first esl pair which sound nice but as many of you know hasn't got good bass output. So I was thinking of making it a hybrid system utilising a magnetic driver for producing the bass. My problem now is the vast difference between the output of bass driver and esl when fed with the same output signal from amp(big diff in sensitivity). So I want to equalise that as well. I have heard a few things about active crossover and bi-amping but would prefer to do a passive solution at the moment. Any help appreciated. Thanks Manoj It could be possible to damp the esl with series resistors or L-pad, but I suspect the woofer has the highest sensitivity? Its not a good idea to put resistors in series with the woofer. A cheap and good entry-level solution is to get the 110$ Behringer CX2310 active crossover, and some kind of power amp to drive the woofer, which dont have to be all that expensive. This solution would probably be better than any passive crossover. Regards, Stig Erik Tangen |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Manoj wrote:
Hi, I have just finished building my first esl pair which sound nice but as many of you know hasn't got good bass output. So I was thinking of making it a hybrid system utilising a magnetic driver for producing the bass. My problem now is the vast difference between the output of bass driver and esl when fed with the same output signal from amp(big diff in sensitivity). So I want to equalise that as well. I have heard a few things about active crossover and bi-amping but would prefer to do a passive solution at the moment. Any help appreciated. Thanks Manoj It could be possible to damp the esl with series resistors or L-pad, but I suspect the woofer has the highest sensitivity? Its not a good idea to put resistors in series with the woofer. A cheap and good entry-level solution is to get the 110$ Behringer CX2310 active crossover, and some kind of power amp to drive the woofer, which dont have to be all that expensive. This solution would probably be better than any passive crossover. Regards, Stig Erik Tangen |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Stig Erik Tangen wrote: It could be possible to damp the esl with series resistors or L-pad, but I suspect the woofer has the highest sensitivity? Its not a good idea to put resistors in series with the woofer. Agreed - wasteful of power, and likely rather expensive. A cheap and good entry-level solution is to get the 110$ Behringer CX2310 active crossover, and some kind of power amp to drive the woofer, which dont have to be all that expensive. This solution would probably be better than any passive crossover. Another option would be to design some sort of shelving-response high-pass filter, and install it between preamp and amp (or in the tape-monitor path). The filter's knee frequency would correspond (roughly) to the driver crossover point, and the amount of low-frequency cut would correspond roughly to the difference in sensitivities between the drivers. Could probably be done with one or two dual op amps, I imagine. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Stig Erik Tangen wrote: It could be possible to damp the esl with series resistors or L-pad, but I suspect the woofer has the highest sensitivity? Its not a good idea to put resistors in series with the woofer. Agreed - wasteful of power, and likely rather expensive. A cheap and good entry-level solution is to get the 110$ Behringer CX2310 active crossover, and some kind of power amp to drive the woofer, which dont have to be all that expensive. This solution would probably be better than any passive crossover. Another option would be to design some sort of shelving-response high-pass filter, and install it between preamp and amp (or in the tape-monitor path). The filter's knee frequency would correspond (roughly) to the driver crossover point, and the amount of low-frequency cut would correspond roughly to the difference in sensitivities between the drivers. Could probably be done with one or two dual op amps, I imagine. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Stig Erik Tangen wrote: It could be possible to damp the esl with series resistors or L-pad, but I suspect the woofer has the highest sensitivity? Its not a good idea to put resistors in series with the woofer. Agreed - wasteful of power, and likely rather expensive. A cheap and good entry-level solution is to get the 110$ Behringer CX2310 active crossover, and some kind of power amp to drive the woofer, which dont have to be all that expensive. This solution would probably be better than any passive crossover. Another option would be to design some sort of shelving-response high-pass filter, and install it between preamp and amp (or in the tape-monitor path). The filter's knee frequency would correspond (roughly) to the driver crossover point, and the amount of low-frequency cut would correspond roughly to the difference in sensitivities between the drivers. Could probably be done with one or two dual op amps, I imagine. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 4/5) | Car Audio | |||
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 3/5) | Car Audio | |||
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 2/5) | Car Audio | |||
My equipment review of the Bose 901 | Audio Opinions | |||
Comments about Blind Testing | High End Audio |