Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Sam Byrams
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question on the Type of Wood Used in Speaker Construction and Effect on Sound

For whatever reason, MDF is actually not a good sounding speaker
material and cabs from multi-ply laminated wood, such as piano pin
block stock, offer many of the theoretical benefits of MDF while
providing better mechanical ruggedness, repairability, appearance and
they "seem to sound better"-no A/B/X proof, just seems to. Maybe it's
my imagination.

duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".
  #3   Report Post  
Dave Platt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question on the Type of Wood Used in Speaker Construction and Effect on Sound

In article ,
Detector195 wrote:

duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".


Considering how much Corian costs, I'm not surprised it's "underused".
I've been told that you pretty much pay for it by the cubic inch,
and that it's very difficult to get ahold of it except as part of
a formal installation by a licensed dealer/installer.

Allegedly, duPont doesn't like the idea of it being installed by
anyone not trained to their standard, on the grounds that it's fairly
easy to mess up an installation (and thus, I presume, they're afraid
of having Corian's good name as a "premium" product damaged by having
people see botched jobs).

I've heard that there are somewhat-similar products from other
manufacturers (essentially finely powdered rock dust in a resin
of some sort) and these might be easier to source.

MDF is heavy enough - I built a set of floordstanding semitower
systems 4' tall, with single-thickness 3/4" MDF for most of the
walls and double-thickness for the front plate. With this much
MDF, plus some internal walls and braces, they're so heavy that
they're at the limit of my ability to move them safely without
assistance. I shudder to think what Corian-based cabs of the
same size would weigh!

--
Dave Platt AE6EO
Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!
  #4   Report Post  
Dave Platt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question on the Type of Wood Used in Speaker Construction and Effect on Sound

In article ,
Detector195 wrote:

duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".


Considering how much Corian costs, I'm not surprised it's "underused".
I've been told that you pretty much pay for it by the cubic inch,
and that it's very difficult to get ahold of it except as part of
a formal installation by a licensed dealer/installer.

Allegedly, duPont doesn't like the idea of it being installed by
anyone not trained to their standard, on the grounds that it's fairly
easy to mess up an installation (and thus, I presume, they're afraid
of having Corian's good name as a "premium" product damaged by having
people see botched jobs).

I've heard that there are somewhat-similar products from other
manufacturers (essentially finely powdered rock dust in a resin
of some sort) and these might be easier to source.

MDF is heavy enough - I built a set of floordstanding semitower
systems 4' tall, with single-thickness 3/4" MDF for most of the
walls and double-thickness for the front plate. With this much
MDF, plus some internal walls and braces, they're so heavy that
they're at the limit of my ability to move them safely without
assistance. I shudder to think what Corian-based cabs of the
same size would weigh!

--
Dave Platt AE6EO
Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!
  #5   Report Post  
Dave Platt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question on the Type of Wood Used in Speaker Construction and Effect on Sound

In article ,
Detector195 wrote:

duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".


Considering how much Corian costs, I'm not surprised it's "underused".
I've been told that you pretty much pay for it by the cubic inch,
and that it's very difficult to get ahold of it except as part of
a formal installation by a licensed dealer/installer.

Allegedly, duPont doesn't like the idea of it being installed by
anyone not trained to their standard, on the grounds that it's fairly
easy to mess up an installation (and thus, I presume, they're afraid
of having Corian's good name as a "premium" product damaged by having
people see botched jobs).

I've heard that there are somewhat-similar products from other
manufacturers (essentially finely powdered rock dust in a resin
of some sort) and these might be easier to source.

MDF is heavy enough - I built a set of floordstanding semitower
systems 4' tall, with single-thickness 3/4" MDF for most of the
walls and double-thickness for the front plate. With this much
MDF, plus some internal walls and braces, they're so heavy that
they're at the limit of my ability to move them safely without
assistance. I shudder to think what Corian-based cabs of the
same size would weigh!

--
Dave Platt AE6EO
Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!


  #7   Report Post  
Dick Pierce
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question on the Type of Wood Used in Speaker Construction and Effect on Sound

Stewart Pinkerton wrote in message . ..
On 1 Jun 2004 17:53:03 -0700, (Detector195)
wrote:

(Sam Byrams) wrote in message . com...
For whatever reason, MDF is actually not a good sounding speaker
material and cabs from multi-ply laminated wood, such as piano pin
block stock, offer many of the theoretical benefits of MDF while
providing better mechanical ruggedness, repairability, appearance and
they "seem to sound better"-no A/B/X proof, just seems to. Maybe it's
my imagination.

duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".


What, you mean fat, slow and liable to die suddenly? :-)


No, glitzy, flashy but completely lacking in depth and substance.

Well, I can say one thing. MDF is a disaster waiting to happen with
portable speakers -- it swells up when it gets rained on. I always got
satisfactory results with homemade cabs when I used the regular 3/4
birch plywood from Home Depot, though I felt compelled to steer around
the voids.


Agreed, and marine plywood is even more impervious to abuse,
especially if heavily varnished.


Actually, there is a specific product called "void-free" thin-layer
birch plywood, part of the generic "baltic birch" family of products.
It has no internal voids and uses a better glue. It's used a lot in
making windchests in pipe organs, where you don't want air finding
it's way into places it shouldn't be going.
  #8   Report Post  
Sam Byrams
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dick Pierce on Altec, or MM?

duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".


What, you mean fat, slow and liable to die suddenly? :-)


No, glitzy, flashy but completely lacking in depth and substance.




The Altec is a real speaker with a 15" cone and some real build cost,
not like the stuff they sell at Madisound. We have this fantasy today
you can build a really first-rate speaker out of small drivers and
inexpensive crossovers, and while some of the "Speaker
Builder(magazine)mentality projects" sound pretty good for the cost,
and the high end stores sell very expensive versions of these same
products with little improvement, that doesn't make them the equal of
classic Altec and Lansing and a few other designs that cost a lot of
money to build.

The history of technology is that the new one almost always costs
less to build than the old one. If there is a total improvement, well
and fine, but more often it's a tradeoff-this for that. A 2004 car has
better engine management systems than a 1964 car, but the foundry work
on the block and heads was invariably better on the 1964 model. Most
of today's engines are not intended to be rebuilt and have very thin
castings.

Unlike ham radio, a dying hobby of cheapskates, audio people are all
too willing to spend money. You can buy $10,000 vacuum tube amps built
with the techniques used on $799 guitar amps, and not very much more
build cost. If you are going to spend all that money, there should be
some build cost-an Audio Research or c-j tube amp ought to be built as
well as a Vollum-era Tek scope. Are they? Are the output transformers
as good as UTC or Peerless? Look at the Thiel speakers, most of which
look inside as though they might have been built out of a Speaker
Builder article by a former pro home cabinetmaker or guitar
builder.(Because they could have been.) Then there's the Linn Sondek
turntable, almost as good as the last Merrill-upgraded AR's.

You are, however, entitled to your own opinion on MM. There's no
accounting for taste, but to me, her Rose Loomis in Niagara-you're
glad to see her strangled dead-Ava Gardner couldn't have done better.
  #9   Report Post  
Dick Pierce
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dick Pierce on Altec, or MM?

(Sam Byrams) wrote in message . com...
duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".

What, you mean fat, slow and liable to die suddenly? :-)


No, glitzy, flashy but completely lacking in depth and substance.


The Altec is a real speaker with a 15" cone and some real build cost,
not like the stuff they sell at Madisound. We have this fantasy today
you can build a really first-rate speaker out of small drivers and
inexpensive crossovers, and while some of the "Speaker
Builder(magazine)mentality projects" sound pretty good for the cost,
and the high end stores sell very expensive versions of these same
products with little improvement, that doesn't make them the equal of
classic Altec and Lansing and a few other designs that cost a lot of
money to build.


For all the money it costs to build an Altec 604, let's see what you get:

1. A system built before and, subsequently, in effective ignorance
of the comprehensive Thiele-Small model. Thus, as a result, a
misdesigned, mistuned conglomeration of poorly integrated parts
and, well, "concepts" to be generous, that misses the theoretical
capabilities of a cabinet that large and a woofer that big by a
VERY wide margin.

2. A "real" large driver with very poor linearity that has no better
linear volume displacement than your alledged "cheap" smaller
drivers, with a stiff and VERY non-linear suspension.

3. A "real" expensive crossover that was designed without any
consideration of conjugate load matching.

If you like the Altecs, fine. But holding them up as a paragon of
design acumen, as shining examples of how to design a well-performing
speaker in any reasonable objective sense is, well, amusing.
  #10   Report Post  
Sam Byrams
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dick Pierce on Altec, or MM?

1. A system built before and, subsequently, in effective ignorance
of the comprehensive Thiele-Small model. Thus, as a result, a
misdesigned, mistuned conglomeration of poorly integrated parts
and, well, "concepts" to be generous, that misses the theoretical
capabilities of a cabinet that large and a woofer that big by a
VERY wide margin.


Many enclosures were available for the 604, which is the driver
proper, and the old ones are crude by modern standards. The Japanese
have built several commercially, they tend to be really big and heavy.
Big and heavy is good until you have to ship it from Japan.




2. A "real" large driver with very poor linearity that has no better
linear volume displacement than your alledged "cheap" smaller
drivers, with a stiff and VERY non-linear suspension.

3. A "real" expensive crossover that was designed without any
consideration of conjugate load matching


Doug Sax of Mastering Labs designed a much better x/o but although
it's still available to order I think even he would admit biamping is
better.






If you like the Altecs, fine. But holding them up as a paragon of
design acumen, as shining examples of how to design a well-performing
speaker in any reasonable objective sense is, well, amusing.



I have a pair of late (Mantaray) 604s with Mastering Labs x/o in some
cement cabs. I like them but they are not perfect. Improved cab design
and biamping will lead to substantial improvement, I think.

As a general rule, I like well-designed coaxes. I don't think they
are the only good technology, but they make life simpler. The Tannoys
are apparently no longer available commercially, no is the 12" used in
Urei studio monitors.


  #11   Report Post  
Sam Byrams
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dick Pierce on Altec, or MM?

1. A system built before and, subsequently, in effective ignorance
of the comprehensive Thiele-Small model. Thus, as a result, a
misdesigned, mistuned conglomeration of poorly integrated parts
and, well, "concepts" to be generous, that misses the theoretical
capabilities of a cabinet that large and a woofer that big by a
VERY wide margin.


Many enclosures were available for the 604, which is the driver
proper, and the old ones are crude by modern standards. The Japanese
have built several commercially, they tend to be really big and heavy.
Big and heavy is good until you have to ship it from Japan.




2. A "real" large driver with very poor linearity that has no better
linear volume displacement than your alledged "cheap" smaller
drivers, with a stiff and VERY non-linear suspension.

3. A "real" expensive crossover that was designed without any
consideration of conjugate load matching


Doug Sax of Mastering Labs designed a much better x/o but although
it's still available to order I think even he would admit biamping is
better.






If you like the Altecs, fine. But holding them up as a paragon of
design acumen, as shining examples of how to design a well-performing
speaker in any reasonable objective sense is, well, amusing.



I have a pair of late (Mantaray) 604s with Mastering Labs x/o in some
cement cabs. I like them but they are not perfect. Improved cab design
and biamping will lead to substantial improvement, I think.

As a general rule, I like well-designed coaxes. I don't think they
are the only good technology, but they make life simpler. The Tannoys
are apparently no longer available commercially, no is the 12" used in
Urei studio monitors.
  #12   Report Post  
Sam Byrams
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dick Pierce on Altec, or MM?

1. A system built before and, subsequently, in effective ignorance
of the comprehensive Thiele-Small model. Thus, as a result, a
misdesigned, mistuned conglomeration of poorly integrated parts
and, well, "concepts" to be generous, that misses the theoretical
capabilities of a cabinet that large and a woofer that big by a
VERY wide margin.


Many enclosures were available for the 604, which is the driver
proper, and the old ones are crude by modern standards. The Japanese
have built several commercially, they tend to be really big and heavy.
Big and heavy is good until you have to ship it from Japan.




2. A "real" large driver with very poor linearity that has no better
linear volume displacement than your alledged "cheap" smaller
drivers, with a stiff and VERY non-linear suspension.

3. A "real" expensive crossover that was designed without any
consideration of conjugate load matching


Doug Sax of Mastering Labs designed a much better x/o but although
it's still available to order I think even he would admit biamping is
better.






If you like the Altecs, fine. But holding them up as a paragon of
design acumen, as shining examples of how to design a well-performing
speaker in any reasonable objective sense is, well, amusing.



I have a pair of late (Mantaray) 604s with Mastering Labs x/o in some
cement cabs. I like them but they are not perfect. Improved cab design
and biamping will lead to substantial improvement, I think.

As a general rule, I like well-designed coaxes. I don't think they
are the only good technology, but they make life simpler. The Tannoys
are apparently no longer available commercially, no is the 12" used in
Urei studio monitors.
  #13   Report Post  
Dick Pierce
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dick Pierce on Altec, or MM?

(Sam Byrams) wrote in message . com...
duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".

What, you mean fat, slow and liable to die suddenly? :-)


No, glitzy, flashy but completely lacking in depth and substance.


The Altec is a real speaker with a 15" cone and some real build cost,
not like the stuff they sell at Madisound. We have this fantasy today
you can build a really first-rate speaker out of small drivers and
inexpensive crossovers, and while some of the "Speaker
Builder(magazine)mentality projects" sound pretty good for the cost,
and the high end stores sell very expensive versions of these same
products with little improvement, that doesn't make them the equal of
classic Altec and Lansing and a few other designs that cost a lot of
money to build.


For all the money it costs to build an Altec 604, let's see what you get:

1. A system built before and, subsequently, in effective ignorance
of the comprehensive Thiele-Small model. Thus, as a result, a
misdesigned, mistuned conglomeration of poorly integrated parts
and, well, "concepts" to be generous, that misses the theoretical
capabilities of a cabinet that large and a woofer that big by a
VERY wide margin.

2. A "real" large driver with very poor linearity that has no better
linear volume displacement than your alledged "cheap" smaller
drivers, with a stiff and VERY non-linear suspension.

3. A "real" expensive crossover that was designed without any
consideration of conjugate load matching.

If you like the Altecs, fine. But holding them up as a paragon of
design acumen, as shining examples of how to design a well-performing
speaker in any reasonable objective sense is, well, amusing.
  #14   Report Post  
Dick Pierce
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dick Pierce on Altec, or MM?

(Sam Byrams) wrote in message . com...
duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".

What, you mean fat, slow and liable to die suddenly? :-)


No, glitzy, flashy but completely lacking in depth and substance.


The Altec is a real speaker with a 15" cone and some real build cost,
not like the stuff they sell at Madisound. We have this fantasy today
you can build a really first-rate speaker out of small drivers and
inexpensive crossovers, and while some of the "Speaker
Builder(magazine)mentality projects" sound pretty good for the cost,
and the high end stores sell very expensive versions of these same
products with little improvement, that doesn't make them the equal of
classic Altec and Lansing and a few other designs that cost a lot of
money to build.


For all the money it costs to build an Altec 604, let's see what you get:

1. A system built before and, subsequently, in effective ignorance
of the comprehensive Thiele-Small model. Thus, as a result, a
misdesigned, mistuned conglomeration of poorly integrated parts
and, well, "concepts" to be generous, that misses the theoretical
capabilities of a cabinet that large and a woofer that big by a
VERY wide margin.

2. A "real" large driver with very poor linearity that has no better
linear volume displacement than your alledged "cheap" smaller
drivers, with a stiff and VERY non-linear suspension.

3. A "real" expensive crossover that was designed without any
consideration of conjugate load matching.

If you like the Altecs, fine. But holding them up as a paragon of
design acumen, as shining examples of how to design a well-performing
speaker in any reasonable objective sense is, well, amusing.
  #15   Report Post  
Sam Byrams
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dick Pierce on Altec, or MM?

duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".


What, you mean fat, slow and liable to die suddenly? :-)


No, glitzy, flashy but completely lacking in depth and substance.




The Altec is a real speaker with a 15" cone and some real build cost,
not like the stuff they sell at Madisound. We have this fantasy today
you can build a really first-rate speaker out of small drivers and
inexpensive crossovers, and while some of the "Speaker
Builder(magazine)mentality projects" sound pretty good for the cost,
and the high end stores sell very expensive versions of these same
products with little improvement, that doesn't make them the equal of
classic Altec and Lansing and a few other designs that cost a lot of
money to build.

The history of technology is that the new one almost always costs
less to build than the old one. If there is a total improvement, well
and fine, but more often it's a tradeoff-this for that. A 2004 car has
better engine management systems than a 1964 car, but the foundry work
on the block and heads was invariably better on the 1964 model. Most
of today's engines are not intended to be rebuilt and have very thin
castings.

Unlike ham radio, a dying hobby of cheapskates, audio people are all
too willing to spend money. You can buy $10,000 vacuum tube amps built
with the techniques used on $799 guitar amps, and not very much more
build cost. If you are going to spend all that money, there should be
some build cost-an Audio Research or c-j tube amp ought to be built as
well as a Vollum-era Tek scope. Are they? Are the output transformers
as good as UTC or Peerless? Look at the Thiel speakers, most of which
look inside as though they might have been built out of a Speaker
Builder article by a former pro home cabinetmaker or guitar
builder.(Because they could have been.) Then there's the Linn Sondek
turntable, almost as good as the last Merrill-upgraded AR's.

You are, however, entitled to your own opinion on MM. There's no
accounting for taste, but to me, her Rose Loomis in Niagara-you're
glad to see her strangled dead-Ava Gardner couldn't have done better.


  #16   Report Post  
Sam Byrams
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dick Pierce on Altec, or MM?

duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".


What, you mean fat, slow and liable to die suddenly? :-)


No, glitzy, flashy but completely lacking in depth and substance.




The Altec is a real speaker with a 15" cone and some real build cost,
not like the stuff they sell at Madisound. We have this fantasy today
you can build a really first-rate speaker out of small drivers and
inexpensive crossovers, and while some of the "Speaker
Builder(magazine)mentality projects" sound pretty good for the cost,
and the high end stores sell very expensive versions of these same
products with little improvement, that doesn't make them the equal of
classic Altec and Lansing and a few other designs that cost a lot of
money to build.

The history of technology is that the new one almost always costs
less to build than the old one. If there is a total improvement, well
and fine, but more often it's a tradeoff-this for that. A 2004 car has
better engine management systems than a 1964 car, but the foundry work
on the block and heads was invariably better on the 1964 model. Most
of today's engines are not intended to be rebuilt and have very thin
castings.

Unlike ham radio, a dying hobby of cheapskates, audio people are all
too willing to spend money. You can buy $10,000 vacuum tube amps built
with the techniques used on $799 guitar amps, and not very much more
build cost. If you are going to spend all that money, there should be
some build cost-an Audio Research or c-j tube amp ought to be built as
well as a Vollum-era Tek scope. Are they? Are the output transformers
as good as UTC or Peerless? Look at the Thiel speakers, most of which
look inside as though they might have been built out of a Speaker
Builder article by a former pro home cabinetmaker or guitar
builder.(Because they could have been.) Then there's the Linn Sondek
turntable, almost as good as the last Merrill-upgraded AR's.

You are, however, entitled to your own opinion on MM. There's no
accounting for taste, but to me, her Rose Loomis in Niagara-you're
glad to see her strangled dead-Ava Gardner couldn't have done better.
  #17   Report Post  
Dick Pierce
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question on the Type of Wood Used in Speaker Construction and Effect on Sound

Stewart Pinkerton wrote in message . ..
On 1 Jun 2004 17:53:03 -0700, (Detector195)
wrote:

(Sam Byrams) wrote in message . com...
For whatever reason, MDF is actually not a good sounding speaker
material and cabs from multi-ply laminated wood, such as piano pin
block stock, offer many of the theoretical benefits of MDF while
providing better mechanical ruggedness, repairability, appearance and
they "seem to sound better"-no A/B/X proof, just seems to. Maybe it's
my imagination.

duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".


What, you mean fat, slow and liable to die suddenly? :-)


No, glitzy, flashy but completely lacking in depth and substance.

Well, I can say one thing. MDF is a disaster waiting to happen with
portable speakers -- it swells up when it gets rained on. I always got
satisfactory results with homemade cabs when I used the regular 3/4
birch plywood from Home Depot, though I felt compelled to steer around
the voids.


Agreed, and marine plywood is even more impervious to abuse,
especially if heavily varnished.


Actually, there is a specific product called "void-free" thin-layer
birch plywood, part of the generic "baltic birch" family of products.
It has no internal voids and uses a better glue. It's used a lot in
making windchests in pipe organs, where you don't want air finding
it's way into places it shouldn't be going.
  #18   Report Post  
Dick Pierce
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question on the Type of Wood Used in Speaker Construction and Effect on Sound

Stewart Pinkerton wrote in message . ..
On 1 Jun 2004 17:53:03 -0700, (Detector195)
wrote:

(Sam Byrams) wrote in message . com...
For whatever reason, MDF is actually not a good sounding speaker
material and cabs from multi-ply laminated wood, such as piano pin
block stock, offer many of the theoretical benefits of MDF while
providing better mechanical ruggedness, repairability, appearance and
they "seem to sound better"-no A/B/X proof, just seems to. Maybe it's
my imagination.

duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".


What, you mean fat, slow and liable to die suddenly? :-)


No, glitzy, flashy but completely lacking in depth and substance.

Well, I can say one thing. MDF is a disaster waiting to happen with
portable speakers -- it swells up when it gets rained on. I always got
satisfactory results with homemade cabs when I used the regular 3/4
birch plywood from Home Depot, though I felt compelled to steer around
the voids.


Agreed, and marine plywood is even more impervious to abuse,
especially if heavily varnished.


Actually, there is a specific product called "void-free" thin-layer
birch plywood, part of the generic "baltic birch" family of products.
It has no internal voids and uses a better glue. It's used a lot in
making windchests in pipe organs, where you don't want air finding
it's way into places it shouldn't be going.
  #19   Report Post  
Sam Byrams
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question on the Type of Wood Used in Speaker Construction and Effect on Sound

Stewart Pinkerton wrote in message . ..
On 1 Jun 2004 17:53:03 -0700, (Detector195)
wrote:

(Sam Byrams) wrote in message . com...
For whatever reason, MDF is actually not a good sounding speaker
material and cabs from multi-ply laminated wood, such as piano pin
block stock, offer many of the theoretical benefits of MDF while
providing better mechanical ruggedness, repairability, appearance and
they "seem to sound better"-no A/B/X proof, just seems to. Maybe it's
my imagination.

duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".


What, you mean fat, slow and liable to die suddenly? :-)


You'd be liable to die suddenly too if someone shot half a pint of
pure Nembutal up your rear end. As far as fat and slow-see the
swimming pool scene from her last film, which AMC paid (a bundle) to
build out as far as they could from what footage there is. At 36, she
was the ultimate naked, wet, and slightly cold (obviously!) female.
Back then, guys who wanted 'hardbodies' would be referred to the NFL.


Well, I can say one thing. MDF is a disaster waiting to happen with
portable speakers -- it swells up when it gets rained on. I always got
satisfactory results with homemade cabs when I used the regular 3/4
birch plywood from Home Depot, though I felt compelled to steer around
the voids.


Agreed, and marine plywood is even more impervious to abuse,
especially if heavily varnished.


Marine ply is the way to go, unless you fill the voids with
something, which is more time than it's worth. Corian is available in
sizes needed by amateur speaker builders as off-fall, and to
professional companies under license: I've never had a problem
sourcing it with cash in hand.
  #20   Report Post  
Ken Richards
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Hollywood Attack Vagina was: Question on the Type of Wood

duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".


What, you mean fat, slow and liable to die suddenly? :-)


You'd be liable to die suddenly too if someone shot half a pint of
pure Nembutal up your rear end. As far as fat and slow-see the
swimming pool scene from her last film, which AMC paid (a bundle) to
build out as far as they could from what footage there is. At 36, she
was the ultimate naked, wet, and slightly cold (obviously!) female.
Back then, guys who wanted 'hardbodies' would be referred to the NFL.


The recent Robert Blake case brings up an interesting angle on this
supposed mystery.

Monroe was basically an "attack vagina". She ****ed and wheedled her
way into expensive and painful acts of matrimony with famous and
status-bearing men-first a not-real-bright ballplayer and then the
all-too-bright playwright-and she figured this would get her in the
White House as well. The Kennedys, particularly Bobby, figured this
out too late and with the Russians putting nuclear missiles ninety
miles from Miami, couldn't afford what might explode into a big
domestic scandal. (The Keeler-Profumo scandal in England less than a
year later would prove those inclinations right.) So after trying to
reason with this disturbed individual proved ineffective, the decision
was made-Bobby made the call, I'm sure, Jack wouldn't have had the
heart, or the balls-she had to go.

My guess is it was an FBI agent-the Bureau was full of the G.Gordon
Liddy types that would have done it then-that actually did the deed.

Did Bobby do right? Well, we're here to read this now. Nuclear war in
1962 might or might not have wiped out the species, but even if
America survived-and I think that in substantial part it would have-we
still wouldn't be back up to 1962 technological and economic
standards.


  #21   Report Post  
Ken Richards
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Hollywood Attack Vagina was: Question on the Type of Wood

duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".


What, you mean fat, slow and liable to die suddenly? :-)


You'd be liable to die suddenly too if someone shot half a pint of
pure Nembutal up your rear end. As far as fat and slow-see the
swimming pool scene from her last film, which AMC paid (a bundle) to
build out as far as they could from what footage there is. At 36, she
was the ultimate naked, wet, and slightly cold (obviously!) female.
Back then, guys who wanted 'hardbodies' would be referred to the NFL.


The recent Robert Blake case brings up an interesting angle on this
supposed mystery.

Monroe was basically an "attack vagina". She ****ed and wheedled her
way into expensive and painful acts of matrimony with famous and
status-bearing men-first a not-real-bright ballplayer and then the
all-too-bright playwright-and she figured this would get her in the
White House as well. The Kennedys, particularly Bobby, figured this
out too late and with the Russians putting nuclear missiles ninety
miles from Miami, couldn't afford what might explode into a big
domestic scandal. (The Keeler-Profumo scandal in England less than a
year later would prove those inclinations right.) So after trying to
reason with this disturbed individual proved ineffective, the decision
was made-Bobby made the call, I'm sure, Jack wouldn't have had the
heart, or the balls-she had to go.

My guess is it was an FBI agent-the Bureau was full of the G.Gordon
Liddy types that would have done it then-that actually did the deed.

Did Bobby do right? Well, we're here to read this now. Nuclear war in
1962 might or might not have wiped out the species, but even if
America survived-and I think that in substantial part it would have-we
still wouldn't be back up to 1962 technological and economic
standards.
  #22   Report Post  
Ken Richards
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Hollywood Attack Vagina was: Question on the Type of Wood

duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".


What, you mean fat, slow and liable to die suddenly? :-)


You'd be liable to die suddenly too if someone shot half a pint of
pure Nembutal up your rear end. As far as fat and slow-see the
swimming pool scene from her last film, which AMC paid (a bundle) to
build out as far as they could from what footage there is. At 36, she
was the ultimate naked, wet, and slightly cold (obviously!) female.
Back then, guys who wanted 'hardbodies' would be referred to the NFL.


The recent Robert Blake case brings up an interesting angle on this
supposed mystery.

Monroe was basically an "attack vagina". She ****ed and wheedled her
way into expensive and painful acts of matrimony with famous and
status-bearing men-first a not-real-bright ballplayer and then the
all-too-bright playwright-and she figured this would get her in the
White House as well. The Kennedys, particularly Bobby, figured this
out too late and with the Russians putting nuclear missiles ninety
miles from Miami, couldn't afford what might explode into a big
domestic scandal. (The Keeler-Profumo scandal in England less than a
year later would prove those inclinations right.) So after trying to
reason with this disturbed individual proved ineffective, the decision
was made-Bobby made the call, I'm sure, Jack wouldn't have had the
heart, or the balls-she had to go.

My guess is it was an FBI agent-the Bureau was full of the G.Gordon
Liddy types that would have done it then-that actually did the deed.

Did Bobby do right? Well, we're here to read this now. Nuclear war in
1962 might or might not have wiped out the species, but even if
America survived-and I think that in substantial part it would have-we
still wouldn't be back up to 1962 technological and economic
standards.
  #23   Report Post  
Sam Byrams
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question on the Type of Wood Used in Speaker Construction and Effect on Sound

Stewart Pinkerton wrote in message . ..
On 1 Jun 2004 17:53:03 -0700, (Detector195)
wrote:

(Sam Byrams) wrote in message . com...
For whatever reason, MDF is actually not a good sounding speaker
material and cabs from multi-ply laminated wood, such as piano pin
block stock, offer many of the theoretical benefits of MDF while
providing better mechanical ruggedness, repairability, appearance and
they "seem to sound better"-no A/B/X proof, just seems to. Maybe it's
my imagination.

duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".


What, you mean fat, slow and liable to die suddenly? :-)


You'd be liable to die suddenly too if someone shot half a pint of
pure Nembutal up your rear end. As far as fat and slow-see the
swimming pool scene from her last film, which AMC paid (a bundle) to
build out as far as they could from what footage there is. At 36, she
was the ultimate naked, wet, and slightly cold (obviously!) female.
Back then, guys who wanted 'hardbodies' would be referred to the NFL.


Well, I can say one thing. MDF is a disaster waiting to happen with
portable speakers -- it swells up when it gets rained on. I always got
satisfactory results with homemade cabs when I used the regular 3/4
birch plywood from Home Depot, though I felt compelled to steer around
the voids.


Agreed, and marine plywood is even more impervious to abuse,
especially if heavily varnished.


Marine ply is the way to go, unless you fill the voids with
something, which is more time than it's worth. Corian is available in
sizes needed by amateur speaker builders as off-fall, and to
professional companies under license: I've never had a problem
sourcing it with cash in hand.
  #24   Report Post  
Sam Byrams
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question on the Type of Wood Used in Speaker Construction and Effect on Sound

Stewart Pinkerton wrote in message . ..
On 1 Jun 2004 17:53:03 -0700, (Detector195)
wrote:

(Sam Byrams) wrote in message . com...
For whatever reason, MDF is actually not a good sounding speaker
material and cabs from multi-ply laminated wood, such as piano pin
block stock, offer many of the theoretical benefits of MDF while
providing better mechanical ruggedness, repairability, appearance and
they "seem to sound better"-no A/B/X proof, just seems to. Maybe it's
my imagination.

duPont Corian is a cool and underutilized material as well. The
Japanese use it in some of their nifty, but too heavy to
cost-effectively import, cabs for classic coax drivers such as the
Altec 604, which I consider to be the "Marilyn Monroe of speakers".


What, you mean fat, slow and liable to die suddenly? :-)


You'd be liable to die suddenly too if someone shot half a pint of
pure Nembutal up your rear end. As far as fat and slow-see the
swimming pool scene from her last film, which AMC paid (a bundle) to
build out as far as they could from what footage there is. At 36, she
was the ultimate naked, wet, and slightly cold (obviously!) female.
Back then, guys who wanted 'hardbodies' would be referred to the NFL.


Well, I can say one thing. MDF is a disaster waiting to happen with
portable speakers -- it swells up when it gets rained on. I always got
satisfactory results with homemade cabs when I used the regular 3/4
birch plywood from Home Depot, though I felt compelled to steer around
the voids.


Agreed, and marine plywood is even more impervious to abuse,
especially if heavily varnished.


Marine ply is the way to go, unless you fill the voids with
something, which is more time than it's worth. Corian is available in
sizes needed by amateur speaker builders as off-fall, and to
professional companies under license: I've never had a problem
sourcing it with cash in hand.
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Old speaker boxes Jebus Tech 270 June 4th 04 01:42 AM
Why shouldn't someone buy Bose? Stephen McLuckie High End Audio 59 April 20th 04 03:01 AM
Speaker Cables and Interconnects, your opinion Stewart Audio Opinions 61 November 14th 03 05:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:00 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"