Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#82
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Randy Yates wrote in message ...
Hey Unitron, Sorry for the late response. (unitron) writes: Randy Yates wrote in message ... Hello, Our church is considering installing an array of single-driver, in-ceiling speakers. It would seem that, given N^2 speakers, configuring an N by N array in which N columns were connected in parallel with each of the N speakers in a column connected in series would be the way to go. This would provide the amplifier with the impedance of one speaker and would evenly divide the power among the N^2 speakers. Is this a bad idea? Are there other considerations to be made? Any comments otherwise? Fellow NC resident (and church sound guy) here. I suppose you can do the series/parallel thing with an almost infinite even number of speakers, but you'll probably need to divide the total number of speakers into the output wattage of the amp to see if each speaker will get enough wattage to drive them all. Yeah, but that's true in some sense anyway. That is, the basically problem of having a lot of speakers and the corresponding amount of power to drive them to usable levels is going to be there no matter what interface (70V or series/parallel) you use. Also, if all these speakers are going to be in the same room, like say the sanctuary or fellowship hall, you may find that the acoustic properties of the room may require that not all the speakers run at the same volume. What acoustic conditions could result in this scenario? I could see it if the room was irregular (especially if the ceiling was lower in some sections). On the other hand if you're looking to distribute sound to several different rooms like the vestibule, choir room, bridal room, nursery, etc., then a 70 Volt system is pretty much the only way to go. We do want to include those rooms. That could be a deciding factor. You may want to consult a professional sound contractor. Tri-Tronics over in Lillington (910-893-4183) have been at it a long time and seem to have some idea what they're doing. Thanks, but I think I'd like to keep it DIY. I've got a couple degrees in electrical engineering, so I oughta' be able to handle it. ![]() thanks for the reference. Could you believe that our pastor was just going to go out and buy another couple of speakers to replace some oldies we have hanging up front and call it good? And one of his main concerns was feedback while in front of the pulpit for communion! Speaking of feedback, it seems that an array is going to be better than two up-front speakers, no? Because the loop gain from the microphone through the system and back is going to be less since the power is distributed spatially over all the speakers and only a few speakers in the array will be significant in the acoustic path. I should probaly snip, but not sure where,so... 70 Volt distribution is used for the same reason that CP&L (Progress Energy since they bought that Florida outfit) doesn't run 220 the whole way from the plant to your house--higher voltage means lower current at same wattage means smaller, cheaper wires for long cable runs. For the vestibule, choir room, bridal room, nursery, etc., you don't need as "hi-fi" a signal as you do to the sound reinforcement speakers in the sanctuary, so you can send a separate signal from the board into a, by comparison, cheap mono Bogen PA amp with 70 volt output for those rooms and wall mount an "L" or "H" (forget which) pad type volume control in each. If the praise team is wailing away practicing in the sanctuary, which goes through the board and that cheap Bogen, and the traditional choir is trying to rehearse in the choir room and they're trying to get the babies to sleep in the nursery it helps for each room to be able to vary their speaker from loud down to off. Most sanctuaries don't have flat 8' ceilings so in-ceiling speakers will be farther away from some of the audience than others depending on how high the ceiling is directly above them. I'd be wary of in-ceiling in a sanctuary anyway. Remember, in sound reinforcement you want to be able to close your eyes, point to where you hear the sound coming from, and then open your eyes to find yourself pointing at the original sound source, usually the stage, pulpit, and/or choir loft. That doesn't necessarily mean that all your loudspeakers have to be mounted there, but the extra sound which you add electronically to that which is already present acoustically should only be loud enough to add in to (and arrive at the same time as) the acoustic sound without being loud enough to change the perception of direction. Those 2 upfront speakers may need augmenting rather than replacing and the feedback problem may be best handled by re-positioning them. You may need to borrow some equipment--extra speakers and amps and such--(and dragoon some church personnel) and experiment with the sanctuary setup to see what does and doesn't work (although this will probably take longer/be more trouble than hiring somebody that specialises in this sort of thing, even if you just get them to do the design and supply all the labor yourselves). If you want to bat this back and forth over the phone email me ) when's a good time to call (assuming that number on your page is valid :-) P.S. In my earlier post about wireless assisted listening systems that should have been "miracle", not "mracle". God may save me, but not, unfortunately, from my typos. |
#83
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Randy Yates wrote in message ...
Hey Unitron, Sorry for the late response. (unitron) writes: Randy Yates wrote in message ... Hello, Our church is considering installing an array of single-driver, in-ceiling speakers. It would seem that, given N^2 speakers, configuring an N by N array in which N columns were connected in parallel with each of the N speakers in a column connected in series would be the way to go. This would provide the amplifier with the impedance of one speaker and would evenly divide the power among the N^2 speakers. Is this a bad idea? Are there other considerations to be made? Any comments otherwise? Fellow NC resident (and church sound guy) here. I suppose you can do the series/parallel thing with an almost infinite even number of speakers, but you'll probably need to divide the total number of speakers into the output wattage of the amp to see if each speaker will get enough wattage to drive them all. Yeah, but that's true in some sense anyway. That is, the basically problem of having a lot of speakers and the corresponding amount of power to drive them to usable levels is going to be there no matter what interface (70V or series/parallel) you use. Also, if all these speakers are going to be in the same room, like say the sanctuary or fellowship hall, you may find that the acoustic properties of the room may require that not all the speakers run at the same volume. What acoustic conditions could result in this scenario? I could see it if the room was irregular (especially if the ceiling was lower in some sections). On the other hand if you're looking to distribute sound to several different rooms like the vestibule, choir room, bridal room, nursery, etc., then a 70 Volt system is pretty much the only way to go. We do want to include those rooms. That could be a deciding factor. You may want to consult a professional sound contractor. Tri-Tronics over in Lillington (910-893-4183) have been at it a long time and seem to have some idea what they're doing. Thanks, but I think I'd like to keep it DIY. I've got a couple degrees in electrical engineering, so I oughta' be able to handle it. ![]() thanks for the reference. Could you believe that our pastor was just going to go out and buy another couple of speakers to replace some oldies we have hanging up front and call it good? And one of his main concerns was feedback while in front of the pulpit for communion! Speaking of feedback, it seems that an array is going to be better than two up-front speakers, no? Because the loop gain from the microphone through the system and back is going to be less since the power is distributed spatially over all the speakers and only a few speakers in the array will be significant in the acoustic path. I should probaly snip, but not sure where,so... 70 Volt distribution is used for the same reason that CP&L (Progress Energy since they bought that Florida outfit) doesn't run 220 the whole way from the plant to your house--higher voltage means lower current at same wattage means smaller, cheaper wires for long cable runs. For the vestibule, choir room, bridal room, nursery, etc., you don't need as "hi-fi" a signal as you do to the sound reinforcement speakers in the sanctuary, so you can send a separate signal from the board into a, by comparison, cheap mono Bogen PA amp with 70 volt output for those rooms and wall mount an "L" or "H" (forget which) pad type volume control in each. If the praise team is wailing away practicing in the sanctuary, which goes through the board and that cheap Bogen, and the traditional choir is trying to rehearse in the choir room and they're trying to get the babies to sleep in the nursery it helps for each room to be able to vary their speaker from loud down to off. Most sanctuaries don't have flat 8' ceilings so in-ceiling speakers will be farther away from some of the audience than others depending on how high the ceiling is directly above them. I'd be wary of in-ceiling in a sanctuary anyway. Remember, in sound reinforcement you want to be able to close your eyes, point to where you hear the sound coming from, and then open your eyes to find yourself pointing at the original sound source, usually the stage, pulpit, and/or choir loft. That doesn't necessarily mean that all your loudspeakers have to be mounted there, but the extra sound which you add electronically to that which is already present acoustically should only be loud enough to add in to (and arrive at the same time as) the acoustic sound without being loud enough to change the perception of direction. Those 2 upfront speakers may need augmenting rather than replacing and the feedback problem may be best handled by re-positioning them. You may need to borrow some equipment--extra speakers and amps and such--(and dragoon some church personnel) and experiment with the sanctuary setup to see what does and doesn't work (although this will probably take longer/be more trouble than hiring somebody that specialises in this sort of thing, even if you just get them to do the design and supply all the labor yourselves). If you want to bat this back and forth over the phone email me ) when's a good time to call (assuming that number on your page is valid :-) P.S. In my earlier post about wireless assisted listening systems that should have been "miracle", not "mracle". God may save me, but not, unfortunately, from my typos. |
#84
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Randy Yates wrote in message ...
Hey Unitron, Sorry for the late response. (unitron) writes: Randy Yates wrote in message ... Hello, Our church is considering installing an array of single-driver, in-ceiling speakers. It would seem that, given N^2 speakers, configuring an N by N array in which N columns were connected in parallel with each of the N speakers in a column connected in series would be the way to go. This would provide the amplifier with the impedance of one speaker and would evenly divide the power among the N^2 speakers. Is this a bad idea? Are there other considerations to be made? Any comments otherwise? Fellow NC resident (and church sound guy) here. I suppose you can do the series/parallel thing with an almost infinite even number of speakers, but you'll probably need to divide the total number of speakers into the output wattage of the amp to see if each speaker will get enough wattage to drive them all. Yeah, but that's true in some sense anyway. That is, the basically problem of having a lot of speakers and the corresponding amount of power to drive them to usable levels is going to be there no matter what interface (70V or series/parallel) you use. Also, if all these speakers are going to be in the same room, like say the sanctuary or fellowship hall, you may find that the acoustic properties of the room may require that not all the speakers run at the same volume. What acoustic conditions could result in this scenario? I could see it if the room was irregular (especially if the ceiling was lower in some sections). On the other hand if you're looking to distribute sound to several different rooms like the vestibule, choir room, bridal room, nursery, etc., then a 70 Volt system is pretty much the only way to go. We do want to include those rooms. That could be a deciding factor. You may want to consult a professional sound contractor. Tri-Tronics over in Lillington (910-893-4183) have been at it a long time and seem to have some idea what they're doing. Thanks, but I think I'd like to keep it DIY. I've got a couple degrees in electrical engineering, so I oughta' be able to handle it. ![]() thanks for the reference. Could you believe that our pastor was just going to go out and buy another couple of speakers to replace some oldies we have hanging up front and call it good? And one of his main concerns was feedback while in front of the pulpit for communion! Speaking of feedback, it seems that an array is going to be better than two up-front speakers, no? Because the loop gain from the microphone through the system and back is going to be less since the power is distributed spatially over all the speakers and only a few speakers in the array will be significant in the acoustic path. I should probaly snip, but not sure where,so... 70 Volt distribution is used for the same reason that CP&L (Progress Energy since they bought that Florida outfit) doesn't run 220 the whole way from the plant to your house--higher voltage means lower current at same wattage means smaller, cheaper wires for long cable runs. For the vestibule, choir room, bridal room, nursery, etc., you don't need as "hi-fi" a signal as you do to the sound reinforcement speakers in the sanctuary, so you can send a separate signal from the board into a, by comparison, cheap mono Bogen PA amp with 70 volt output for those rooms and wall mount an "L" or "H" (forget which) pad type volume control in each. If the praise team is wailing away practicing in the sanctuary, which goes through the board and that cheap Bogen, and the traditional choir is trying to rehearse in the choir room and they're trying to get the babies to sleep in the nursery it helps for each room to be able to vary their speaker from loud down to off. Most sanctuaries don't have flat 8' ceilings so in-ceiling speakers will be farther away from some of the audience than others depending on how high the ceiling is directly above them. I'd be wary of in-ceiling in a sanctuary anyway. Remember, in sound reinforcement you want to be able to close your eyes, point to where you hear the sound coming from, and then open your eyes to find yourself pointing at the original sound source, usually the stage, pulpit, and/or choir loft. That doesn't necessarily mean that all your loudspeakers have to be mounted there, but the extra sound which you add electronically to that which is already present acoustically should only be loud enough to add in to (and arrive at the same time as) the acoustic sound without being loud enough to change the perception of direction. Those 2 upfront speakers may need augmenting rather than replacing and the feedback problem may be best handled by re-positioning them. You may need to borrow some equipment--extra speakers and amps and such--(and dragoon some church personnel) and experiment with the sanctuary setup to see what does and doesn't work (although this will probably take longer/be more trouble than hiring somebody that specialises in this sort of thing, even if you just get them to do the design and supply all the labor yourselves). If you want to bat this back and forth over the phone email me ) when's a good time to call (assuming that number on your page is valid :-) P.S. In my earlier post about wireless assisted listening systems that should have been "miracle", not "mracle". God may save me, but not, unfortunately, from my typos. |
#85
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Randy Yates wrote in message ...
Hey Unitron, Sorry for the late response. (unitron) writes: Randy Yates wrote in message ... Hello, Our church is considering installing an array of single-driver, in-ceiling speakers. It would seem that, given N^2 speakers, configuring an N by N array in which N columns were connected in parallel with each of the N speakers in a column connected in series would be the way to go. This would provide the amplifier with the impedance of one speaker and would evenly divide the power among the N^2 speakers. Is this a bad idea? Are there other considerations to be made? Any comments otherwise? Fellow NC resident (and church sound guy) here. I suppose you can do the series/parallel thing with an almost infinite even number of speakers, but you'll probably need to divide the total number of speakers into the output wattage of the amp to see if each speaker will get enough wattage to drive them all. Yeah, but that's true in some sense anyway. That is, the basically problem of having a lot of speakers and the corresponding amount of power to drive them to usable levels is going to be there no matter what interface (70V or series/parallel) you use. Also, if all these speakers are going to be in the same room, like say the sanctuary or fellowship hall, you may find that the acoustic properties of the room may require that not all the speakers run at the same volume. What acoustic conditions could result in this scenario? I could see it if the room was irregular (especially if the ceiling was lower in some sections). On the other hand if you're looking to distribute sound to several different rooms like the vestibule, choir room, bridal room, nursery, etc., then a 70 Volt system is pretty much the only way to go. We do want to include those rooms. That could be a deciding factor. You may want to consult a professional sound contractor. Tri-Tronics over in Lillington (910-893-4183) have been at it a long time and seem to have some idea what they're doing. Thanks, but I think I'd like to keep it DIY. I've got a couple degrees in electrical engineering, so I oughta' be able to handle it. ![]() thanks for the reference. Could you believe that our pastor was just going to go out and buy another couple of speakers to replace some oldies we have hanging up front and call it good? And one of his main concerns was feedback while in front of the pulpit for communion! Speaking of feedback, it seems that an array is going to be better than two up-front speakers, no? Because the loop gain from the microphone through the system and back is going to be less since the power is distributed spatially over all the speakers and only a few speakers in the array will be significant in the acoustic path. I should probaly snip, but not sure where,so... 70 Volt distribution is used for the same reason that CP&L (Progress Energy since they bought that Florida outfit) doesn't run 220 the whole way from the plant to your house--higher voltage means lower current at same wattage means smaller, cheaper wires for long cable runs. For the vestibule, choir room, bridal room, nursery, etc., you don't need as "hi-fi" a signal as you do to the sound reinforcement speakers in the sanctuary, so you can send a separate signal from the board into a, by comparison, cheap mono Bogen PA amp with 70 volt output for those rooms and wall mount an "L" or "H" (forget which) pad type volume control in each. If the praise team is wailing away practicing in the sanctuary, which goes through the board and that cheap Bogen, and the traditional choir is trying to rehearse in the choir room and they're trying to get the babies to sleep in the nursery it helps for each room to be able to vary their speaker from loud down to off. Most sanctuaries don't have flat 8' ceilings so in-ceiling speakers will be farther away from some of the audience than others depending on how high the ceiling is directly above them. I'd be wary of in-ceiling in a sanctuary anyway. Remember, in sound reinforcement you want to be able to close your eyes, point to where you hear the sound coming from, and then open your eyes to find yourself pointing at the original sound source, usually the stage, pulpit, and/or choir loft. That doesn't necessarily mean that all your loudspeakers have to be mounted there, but the extra sound which you add electronically to that which is already present acoustically should only be loud enough to add in to (and arrive at the same time as) the acoustic sound without being loud enough to change the perception of direction. Those 2 upfront speakers may need augmenting rather than replacing and the feedback problem may be best handled by re-positioning them. You may need to borrow some equipment--extra speakers and amps and such--(and dragoon some church personnel) and experiment with the sanctuary setup to see what does and doesn't work (although this will probably take longer/be more trouble than hiring somebody that specialises in this sort of thing, even if you just get them to do the design and supply all the labor yourselves). If you want to bat this back and forth over the phone email me ) when's a good time to call (assuming that number on your page is valid :-) P.S. In my earlier post about wireless assisted listening systems that should have been "miracle", not "mracle". God may save me, but not, unfortunately, from my typos. |
#86
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
El Meda wrote
Randy Yates wrote: I suggest however that you connect the N speakers in each column in parallel, and then each parallel array in series with each other. That way, if one of the speakers goes bad and opens, it won't mute the entire column it is in. But then you have the alternate problem - one speaker which shorts will take down the whole array. But thank you for provoking some more thought on the matter. Not the whole array, only the column it's in: the total impedance will only be reduced by R/N. Besides in my experience the speaker won't usually short, and frequently open. Nonetheless, huge series-parallel arrays can be a right pain to faultfind on and are rather inflexible. If it's essential to use speakers without inbuilt transformers, then I'd suggest running the main runs in 70V and having one cluster of 4 speakers in series-parallel per transformer. That cuts down the number of xfrs required to 1/4 of the ceiling speakers, and gives the other benefits of 70V line, i.e. easy parallel connection, easier fault finding, easy to adjust individual speaker (or each cluster) levels, taking feeds out to side rooms, etc. Owain |
#87
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
El Meda wrote
Randy Yates wrote: I suggest however that you connect the N speakers in each column in parallel, and then each parallel array in series with each other. That way, if one of the speakers goes bad and opens, it won't mute the entire column it is in. But then you have the alternate problem - one speaker which shorts will take down the whole array. But thank you for provoking some more thought on the matter. Not the whole array, only the column it's in: the total impedance will only be reduced by R/N. Besides in my experience the speaker won't usually short, and frequently open. Nonetheless, huge series-parallel arrays can be a right pain to faultfind on and are rather inflexible. If it's essential to use speakers without inbuilt transformers, then I'd suggest running the main runs in 70V and having one cluster of 4 speakers in series-parallel per transformer. That cuts down the number of xfrs required to 1/4 of the ceiling speakers, and gives the other benefits of 70V line, i.e. easy parallel connection, easier fault finding, easy to adjust individual speaker (or each cluster) levels, taking feeds out to side rooms, etc. Owain |
#88
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
El Meda wrote
Randy Yates wrote: I suggest however that you connect the N speakers in each column in parallel, and then each parallel array in series with each other. That way, if one of the speakers goes bad and opens, it won't mute the entire column it is in. But then you have the alternate problem - one speaker which shorts will take down the whole array. But thank you for provoking some more thought on the matter. Not the whole array, only the column it's in: the total impedance will only be reduced by R/N. Besides in my experience the speaker won't usually short, and frequently open. Nonetheless, huge series-parallel arrays can be a right pain to faultfind on and are rather inflexible. If it's essential to use speakers without inbuilt transformers, then I'd suggest running the main runs in 70V and having one cluster of 4 speakers in series-parallel per transformer. That cuts down the number of xfrs required to 1/4 of the ceiling speakers, and gives the other benefits of 70V line, i.e. easy parallel connection, easier fault finding, easy to adjust individual speaker (or each cluster) levels, taking feeds out to side rooms, etc. Owain |
#89
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
El Meda wrote
Randy Yates wrote: I suggest however that you connect the N speakers in each column in parallel, and then each parallel array in series with each other. That way, if one of the speakers goes bad and opens, it won't mute the entire column it is in. But then you have the alternate problem - one speaker which shorts will take down the whole array. But thank you for provoking some more thought on the matter. Not the whole array, only the column it's in: the total impedance will only be reduced by R/N. Besides in my experience the speaker won't usually short, and frequently open. Nonetheless, huge series-parallel arrays can be a right pain to faultfind on and are rather inflexible. If it's essential to use speakers without inbuilt transformers, then I'd suggest running the main runs in 70V and having one cluster of 4 speakers in series-parallel per transformer. That cuts down the number of xfrs required to 1/4 of the ceiling speakers, and gives the other benefits of 70V line, i.e. easy parallel connection, easier fault finding, easy to adjust individual speaker (or each cluster) levels, taking feeds out to side rooms, etc. Owain |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bose 901 Review | General | |||
My equipment review of the Bose 901 | Audio Opinions | |||
Comments about Blind Testing | High End Audio | |||
Speaker Wiring affects phase relationships | Car Audio | |||
Speaker cables | Pro Audio |