Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm looking for excellent reverb plugins for Cool Edit Pro 2.0--now
Adobe Audition. Something along the line of the TC WORKS NATIVE BUNDLE would have been nice, but it's been discontinued. Price is not my first concern, but hight-quality audio is. I would be willing to purchase a bundle if it contained comp/limiter, parametric eq, and outstanding reverb algorithms. Anyone working on high-end stuff who knows where to point me? Thanks much. N |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Nevstein posted:
I'm looking for excellent reverb plugins for Cool Edit Pro 2.0--now Adobe Audition. Something along the line of the TC WORKS NATIVE BUNDLE would have been nice, but it's been discontinued. Price is not my first concern, but hight-quality audio is. I would be willing to purchase a bundle if it contained comp/limiter, parametric eq, and outstanding reverb algorithms. Anyone working on high-end stuff who knows where to point me? Thanks much. I'd point you right back to CoolEdit Pro. There are several reverbs, and some are quite maleable. The compander module is excellent, and the EQ options are superior to most anything else I've used. All in all, a great package. Neil |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nevstein wrote:
I'm looking for excellent reverb plugins for Cool Edit Pro 2.0--now Adobe Audition. Something along the line of the TC WORKS NATIVE BUNDLE would have been nice, but it's been discontinued. Price is not my first concern, but hight-quality audio is. I would be willing to purchase a bundle if it contained comp/limiter, parametric eq, and outstanding reverb algorithms. Anyone working on high-end stuff who knows where to point me? Thanks much. N The reverbs that come with Cool Edit Pro are pretty good (with the obvious exception of quick-verb). The main disadvantage is that they seem to be convolution based so they take a fair amount of processing power and you can't tweak them while playing. You can also import your own impulses into the convolution plug-in. I tend to only use alternatives when I want something that is somewhere in between the quality of quick-verb and full reverb. Cheers. James. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
James Perrett wrote:
The reverbs that come with Cool Edit Pro are pretty good (with the obvious exception of quick-verb). The main disadvantage is that they seem to be convolution based so they take a fair amount of processing power and you can't tweak them while playing. You can also import your own impulses into the convolution plug-in. I tend to only use alternatives when I want something that is somewhere in between the quality of quick-verb and full reverb. IMHO Adobe Audion has three different algorithms implemented. Depending on the program I either use the old reverb (that existed in CEP 1.0) or the new one which is called full reverb (that was introduce in CEP 1.2). I never used quick-verb. I found strong relationship between the quality of the reverb and the sampling rate. So for critical work (vocals) I use 96 kHz sr. Either I do upsampling or use 96 kHz during A/D. Most other function of CE do not depend on the sampling rate, but reverb does. HTH Norbert |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ProTools or Cool Edit ? ? ? | Pro Audio | |||
Cool Edit Pro 2.0 doesn't see all of my inputs | Pro Audio | |||
Monitoring using apogee mini me and Cool edit | Pro Audio | |||
Alternative to Cool Edit 2000 | Pro Audio | |||
Adobe Audition - Cool Edit Pro / Cool Edit 2000 | Audio Opinions |