Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18/07/2020 12:48, geoff wrote:
I don't actually have any NS10s, but I do have a pair of NS20s. But they are not remotely the same thing. The reason I used to hear for having a pair of NS-10s to hand was that you make the best mix you can on your normal full range monitors, check it on cheap headphones and a car system, and then listen on the NS-10s while looking at it and watching how the cone distorts physically on the bass notes. If it still sounds good and the bass driver cone doesn't distort too badly on the NS-10, then the mix is okay for any sensible listening system. They were the archetypal cheap and nasty speaker. -- Tciao for Now! John. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Williamson wrote:
If it still sounds good and the bass driver cone doesn't distort too badly on the NS-10, then the mix is okay for any sensible listening system. They were the archetypal cheap and nasty speaker. But they were (and still are) a consistent and reliable cheap and nasty speaker. They are the same in every studio. That was a big deal back in the days of big soffit-mounted systems that sounded different in every control room, and even though it's not as big a deal today it's still a thing people like. I'm not sure it's as good a mix check as it used to be... people are more often listening on desktop 2.1 systems that are awful in different ways than the NS-10 is awful. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18/07/2020 16:35, Scott Dorsey wrote:
John Williamson wrote: If it still sounds good and the bass driver cone doesn't distort too badly on the NS-10, then the mix is okay for any sensible listening system. They were the archetypal cheap and nasty speaker. But they were (and still are) a consistent and reliable cheap and nasty speaker. They are the same in every studio. That was a big deal back in the days of big soffit-mounted systems that sounded different in every control room, and even though it's not as big a deal today it's still a thing people like. I'm not sure it's as good a mix check as it used to be... people are more often listening on desktop 2.1 systems that are awful in different ways than the NS-10 is awful. Agreed. I have one such nearby.... -- Tciao for Now! John. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
John Williamson wrote: If it still sounds good and the bass driver cone doesn't distort too badly on the NS-10, then the mix is okay for any sensible listening system. They were the archetypal cheap and nasty speaker. But they were (and still are) a consistent and reliable cheap and nasty speaker. They are the same in every studio. That was a big deal back in the days of big soffit-mounted systems that sounded different in every control room, and even though it's not as big a deal today it's still a thing people like. I'm not sure it's as good a mix check as it used to be... people are more often listening on desktop 2.1 systems that are awful in different ways than the NS-10 is awful. --scott At the same time, there are not-awful 2.1 systems for very cheap. They obviously vary greatly. -- Les Cargill |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19/07/2020 1:25 am, John Williamson wrote:
If it still sounds good and the bass driver cone doesn't distort too badly on the NS-10, then the mix is okay for any sensible listening system. They were the archetypal cheap and nasty speaker. Pretty nasty perhaps, but not really all that cheap considering. |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Trevor wrote:
On 19/07/2020 1:25 am, John Williamson wrote: If it still sounds good and the bass driver cone doesn't distort too badly on the NS-10, then the mix is okay for any sensible listening system. They were the archetypal cheap and nasty speaker. Pretty nasty perhaps, but not really all that cheap considering. We got ours free from the Yamaha rep. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21/07/2020 8:36 pm, Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article , Trevor wrote: On 19/07/2020 1:25 am, John Williamson wrote: If it still sounds good and the bass driver cone doesn't distort too badly on the NS-10, then the mix is okay for any sensible listening system. They were the archetypal cheap and nasty speaker. Pretty nasty perhaps, but not really all that cheap considering. We got ours free from the Yamaha rep. Yeah, but some people actually paid for them. :-) |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Trevor wrote:
On 21/07/2020 8:36 pm, Scott Dorsey wrote: In article , Trevor wrote: On 19/07/2020 1:25 am, John Williamson wrote: If it still sounds good and the bass driver cone doesn't distort too badly on the NS-10, then the mix is okay for any sensible listening system. They were the archetypal cheap and nasty speaker. Pretty nasty perhaps, but not really all that cheap considering. We got ours free from the Yamaha rep. Yeah, but some people actually paid for them. :-) That totally floored me at the time, and I guess it still kind of does. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24/07/2020 1:50 am, Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article , Trevor wrote: On 21/07/2020 8:36 pm, Scott Dorsey wrote: In article , Trevor wrote: On 19/07/2020 1:25 am, John Williamson wrote: If it still sounds good and the bass driver cone doesn't distort too badly on the NS-10, then the mix is okay for any sensible listening system. They were the archetypal cheap and nasty speaker. Pretty nasty perhaps, but not really all that cheap considering. We got ours free from the Yamaha rep. Yeah, but some people actually paid for them. :-) That totally floored me at the time, and I guess it still kind of does. --scott And they (and others) still leech off the concept by repeating or emulating the cunning plan of the distinctive white bass drivers, made highly visible in photos from many studio control rooms - most of those buying them thinking that they were there because they sounded so GOOD ! geoff |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
geoff wrote:
And they (and others) still leech off the concept by repeating or emulating the cunning plan of the distinctive white bass drivers, made highly visible in photos from many studio control rooms - most of those buying them thinking that they were there because they sounded so GOOD ! Compared with some of the soffit-mounted monitoring systems of the day they might have seemed like a step up too. I learned to mix on Altec 604s that made the NS-10 top end seem tame and controlled. My god, how much better things are now. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article , Trevor wrote: On 21/07/2020 8:36 pm, Scott Dorsey wrote: In article , Trevor wrote: On 19/07/2020 1:25 am, John Williamson wrote: If it still sounds good and the bass driver cone doesn't distort too badly on the NS-10, then the mix is okay for any sensible listening system. They were the archetypal cheap and nasty speaker. Pretty nasty perhaps, but not really all that cheap considering. We got ours free from the Yamaha rep. Yeah, but some people actually paid for them. :-) That totally floored me at the time, and I guess it still kind of does. --scott There's a pair on Reverb.com with an asking price of $1000. -- Les Cargill |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/07/2020 12:20 pm, Les Cargill wrote:
Scott Dorsey wrote: In article , TrevorĀ* wrote: On 21/07/2020 8:36 pm, Scott Dorsey wrote: In article , TrevorĀ* wrote: On 19/07/2020 1:25 am, John Williamson wrote: If it still sounds good and the bass driver cone doesn't distort too badly on the NS-10, then the mix is okay for any sensible listening system. They were the archetypal cheap and nasty speaker. Pretty nasty perhaps, but not really all that cheap considering. We got ours free from the Yamaha rep. Yeah, but some people actually paid for them. :-) That totally floored me at the time, and I guess it still kind of does. --scott There's a pair on Reverb.com with an asking price of $1000. HAHAHAHA. Funny thing is somebody will probably pay it. :-) |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Trevor wrote:
Pretty nasty perhaps, but not really all that cheap considering. __________ Considering their construction - I have bruised my knuckles rapping on few speaker cabinets as rock-solid as that of a NS-10 or any of its letter derivatives! Those Yammies were brutally honest. All of their sound came from their transducers, and none from anywhere else on that speaker. Most people, esp. consumers, are used to speakers where from twenty to as much as seventy-percent of what they hear comes from the CABINET and mounting points of a speaker. Those resonances can permanently affect their perception of and experience of music they listen to on them. Then they listen to a reference monitor and vomit... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What make and model number burner do you use to make quality, audio CDs - currently on the market? | Tech | |||
FS: Mackie HR824 Studio Monitors in Mint Condition used in a smoke free studio. | Pro Audio | |||
subwoofer different make to monitors? | Pro Audio | |||
FOR SALE Altec Lansing Model 19 Studio Monitors | Marketplace |