Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
geoff wrote:
Dunno - have got the M40s. Probably pretty accurate description of the M50s though, but by no means is it extreme. M50Xs less scooped. But is that the *only* difference with the M40s ? Probably not. geoff ____________ Beyond the obvious price difference, the M40x impedance is slightly lower - 35ohms vs the 38 on M50x. So probably easier to drive with the typical smart phone. And slightly narrower range of fit adjustments, according to reviewers. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
geoff wrote:
35 v. 38 is neither here nor there. _________ Always a contrary word... You never change, geoff! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
In-ear phones | Pro Audio | |||
in-ear phones | Audio Opinions | |||
IR wireless h'phones picking up radio station!? | Tech | |||
GET FREE CELL PHONES and CAMERA PHONES! | Pro Audio | |||
Req: Suggestions for Wireless Mic & Wireless In-Ear rack set-up | Pro Audio |