Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Tobiah wrote:
My interface has an option that disables all internal mixing. No monitor mix available, and I guess, one would have to do all other routing within the DAW. Why would a person want to do this? Is anything gained in fidelity by sidestepping an ADC or DAC someplace? The less processing you do, the better. The fewer things you have in your signal path, the fewer things there are to do wrong. Any time you change gains, you have the chance of something going wrong. Not to mention that it's one more set of things to get misadjusted accidentally. With such a configuration is there no way to monitor an input other than by round trip through the computer? Sure, through an analogue mixing console. In most cases if you're tracking through a normal console, you just use the console to make cue mixes. Way more convenient and direct than using wacky mixing hardware in your ADC. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Analog Mixer to External Audio Interface to Computer | Pro Audio | |||
Mixer or Audio-Interface: which one to choose? | Pro Audio | |||
Advice on mixer/audio interface | Pro Audio | |||
Repost Advice on mixer/audio interface | Pro Audio | |||
FA: Event EZBus Digital mixer / computer interface | Pro Audio |