Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
geoff wrote: Many first generation remastered CDs had the treble that was there cranked to make up for the higher treble that didn't exist. Which is why many sounded harsh and glary. Maybe. On the other hand, there are recordings from the seventies, like Hotel California, that were clearly made by people blasted out of their skulls on cocaine who are massively boosting the top end. The original 45 and the consequent LP are listenable because the top end had to be tamed down just to cut it. But the CD reissue sounds just like the master and is painful to hear. They hired Szymczyk and dumped Glyn Johns because Szymczyk would do what he was told. So... okay. Ego is a hell of a drug... That's actually the first CD I ever bought. What I had attributed to surface noise from the LP was actually on the master. Sounded good on the radio, though. --scott -- Les Cargill |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Treble Distortion | General | |||
High SPL Treble | Tech | |||
High SPL Treble | Tech | |||
Why don't classical piano recordings sound as good as pop recordings? | High End Audio |