Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 6:21:40 PM UTC-4, Howard Stone wrote:
The speakers I have are really annoying because, to get them sounding as = good as they should, they need to be positioned in places I don't want them= to be. 1m from walls etc. =20 I want my speakers low down and unobtrusive, or high up on bookshelves. I= want them hiding away in corners and right up against walls. And I want sp= eakers which are flexible, which can be moved anywhere. As it happens, and apart from (very) exceptional room acoustics, your dilem= ma was addressed quite specifically by no less than Acoustic Research and E= dgar Villchur back in the dim and distant 1960s. And, much of the ARs desig= ns historically were based on solving placement issues.=20 All of the above based on minimum 8"/200 mm woofers and against the wall in= "conventional" box-type front-firing speakers. Smaller woofers are hopele= ss in delivering clean bass unless in many multiples - which brings on more= problems than it solves.=20 As follows: Starting on the LONG wall of the listening room: a) Place speaker A at the 1/4 point from one corner. Makes no difference wh= ich. The woofer should be at least one (1) woofer diameter off the floor - = making the center-line at 1.5 diameters. The tweets should be IN or UP.=20 b) Place speaker B at the 1/3 point from the opposite corner. c) While playing a full-range, well-recorded, familiar signal at normal/sli= ghtly lower volume, tweak Speaker B to achieve the best sound-stage. 95% of= the time, B will move closer to A. Starting out, your sound-stage will be = ~2/3 as wide as the distance between the speakers and about as deep as half= the distance between them.=20 d) Once you have achieved a comfortable sound-stage, tweak either/both spea= ker heights to achieve the best possible signal balance. If you have wide-d= ispersion (as in dome) tweets (and, ideally mid-ranges) *YOUR* ear level wi= ll not be critical.=20 And, this should do it - excepting very strange rooms or strangely shaped r= ooms.=20 Notes: 1. At no time should the speakers be symmetrical on a given wall _UNLESS_ t= here is something between them (such as a fireplace) that renders their rel= ationship asymmetrical within the room. Symmetrical placement invites stand= ing waves, cancellation waves and other forms of interference. For the same= reason, no speaker should be placed at a mind-point between two walls.=20 2. Exactly the same exercise obtains on the short wall, except that bass wi= ll be enhanced, sometimes too much.=20 3. Exactly the same exercise obtains from the ceiling rather than the floor= - but the speakers should be bass-up if vertical in that exercise. No chan= ge if on their sides - tweets in. =20 4. With good speakers (clean response curve) final placement will very much= depend on the listener and his/her preferences. And, therefore why the exe= rcise should be with all settings "FLAT" and with familiar and full-range s= ignal. Changes from a good start will not require changes in speaker locati= on(s).=20 5 And to repeat: NOT SYMMETRICAL!=20 Once you have found a configuration that pleases you - give it a week. Mark= the locations in some way, then start over but with a different signal. If= you wind up at the same points, you are done. And, of course, inches do ma= ke a difference - and why you should give it time until you are very happy = with the result.=20 Side note: AR added a center-channel to its flagship receiver as back when = stereo was "new", recording engineers often exaggerated separation as an "O= h, WOW!" factor. And David Hafler designed the Hafler Circuit to address th= at issue, which evolved into the Poor Man's Quadraphonic system. Be careful= that the signal you use is well engineered *and* well recorded.=20 Best of luck - you don't need any "stinking DSP" for good sound!=20 Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter,
Thanks for the post on the AR recommendations. Somehow, I never saw their results this complete, although I'm old enough. Do you have any ideas about how these recommendations apply to dipole speakers? Ed Presson "Peter Wieck" wrote in message ... On Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 6:21:40 PM UTC-4, Howard Stone wrote: The speakers I have are really annoying because, to get them sounding as good as they should, they need to be positioned in places I don't want them to be. 1m from walls etc. I want my speakers low down and unobtrusive, or high up on bookshelves. I want them hiding away in corners and right up against walls. And I want speakers which are flexible, which can be moved anywhere. As it happens, and apart from (very) exceptional room acoustics, your dilemma was addressed quite specifically by no less than Acoustic Research and Edgar Villchur back in the dim and distant 1960s. And, much of the ARs designs historically were based on solving placement issues. All of the above based on minimum 8"/200 mm woofers and against the wall in "conventional" box-type front-firing speakers. Smaller woofers are hopeless in delivering clean bass unless in many multiples - which brings on more problems than it solves. As follows: Starting on the LONG wall of the listening room: a) Place speaker A at the 1/4 point from one corner. Makes no difference which. The woofer should be at least one (1) woofer diameter off the floor - making the center-line at 1.5 diameters. The tweets should be IN or UP. b) Place speaker B at the 1/3 point from the opposite corner. c) While playing a full-range, well-recorded, familiar signal at normal/slightly lower volume, tweak Speaker B to achieve the best sound-stage. 95% of the time, B will move closer to A. Starting out, your sound-stage will be ~2/3 as wide as the distance between the speakers and about as deep as half the distance between them. d) Once you have achieved a comfortable sound-stage, tweak either/both speaker heights to achieve the best possible signal balance. If you have wide-dispersion (as in dome) tweets (and, ideally mid-ranges) *YOUR* ear level will not be critical. And, this should do it - excepting very strange rooms or strangely shaped rooms. Notes: 1. At no time should the speakers be symmetrical on a given wall _UNLESS_ there is something between them (such as a fireplace) that renders their relationship asymmetrical within the room. Symmetrical placement invites standing waves, cancellation waves and other forms of interference. For the same reason, no speaker should be placed at a mind-point between two walls. 2. Exactly the same exercise obtains on the short wall, except that bass will be enhanced, sometimes too much. 3. Exactly the same exercise obtains from the ceiling rather than the floor - but the speakers should be bass-up if vertical in that exercise. No change if on their sides - tweets in. 4. With good speakers (clean response curve) final placement will very much depend on the listener and his/her preferences. And, therefore why the exercise should be with all settings "FLAT" and with familiar and full-range signal. Changes from a good start will not require changes in speaker location(s). 5 And to repeat: NOT SYMMETRICAL! Once you have found a configuration that pleases you - give it a week. Mark the locations in some way, then start over but with a different signal. If you wind up at the same points, you are done. And, of course, inches do make a difference - and why you should give it time until you are very happy with the result. Side note: AR added a center-channel to its flagship receiver as back when stereo was "new", recording engineers often exaggerated separation as an "Oh, WOW!" factor. And David Hafler designed the Hafler Circuit to address that issue, which evolved into the Poor Man's Quadraphonic system. Be careful that the signal you use is well engineered *and* well recorded. Best of luck - you don't need any "stinking DSP" for good sound! Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, May 13, 2019 at 2:37:58 PM UTC-4, Ed Presson wrote:
Do you have any ideas about how these recommendations apply to dipole speakers? As it happens, I keep Maggies (MGIIIa) on the main system. By default, and after much finagling, they wound up in the corners, 45 degrees splayed and with the back-foot about 18" from the wall on the short wall of a 17' x 27' x 10' room. They need all the bass reinforcement they can get, and the treble is so well dispersed that the backs firing into a corner give a very nice depth-of-field. That they are fed by a brute-force power-amp helps a great deal as well. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
blown fuses, but speakers still turn on and make noise | Car Audio | |||
2 ways speakers and 3 ways | Pro Audio | |||
FS: Pair of Vintage C46 JBL Minigon Speakers - Pristine Condition - MAKE OFFER | Marketplace | |||
Installing tweeters on 2-ways | Car Audio | |||
Two ways vs. three ways | Car Audio |