Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have two things I need to do to an audio file and not quite sure how
to do them in Audition. Thanks..... |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:27:33 -0400, JBI wrote:
I have two things I need to do to an audio file and not quite sure how to do them in Audition. Thanks..... I use it, but what you can do depends largely on which version you have. They have been adding froth and deleting features. d |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/23/19 1:29 PM, Don Pearce wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:27:33 -0400, JBI wrote: I have two things I need to do to an audio file and not quite sure how to do them in Audition. Thanks..... I use it, but what you can do depends largely on which version you have. They have been adding froth and deleting features. d CC 2018 |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:33:19 -0400, JBI wrote:
On 4/23/19 1:29 PM, Don Pearce wrote: On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:27:33 -0400, JBI wrote: I have two things I need to do to an audio file and not quite sure how to do them in Audition. Thanks..... I use it, but what you can do depends largely on which version you have. They have been adding froth and deleting features. d CC 2018 OK, that's a bit of a shame. It's a post-inflation version. But who can say? What are you trying to do? d |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/23/19 2:47 PM, Don Pearce wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:33:19 -0400, JBI wrote: On 4/23/19 1:29 PM, Don Pearce wrote: On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:27:33 -0400, JBI wrote: I have two things I need to do to an audio file and not quite sure how to do them in Audition. Thanks..... I use it, but what you can do depends largely on which version you have. They have been adding froth and deleting features. d CC 2018 OK, that's a bit of a shame. It's a post-inflation version. But who can say? What are you trying to do? d Thanks in advance. Ok here goes. Please note the file I need to edit: a one hour, one time only, recording of a live radio broadcast, so I am unable to rerecord anything. Here is what I need to do: 1) The background hiss varies throughout the file since the radio carrier wave became stronger and also faded at times. At some point, I am going to be able to replace certain very noisy sections with sections with quieter background, but I'd like to first apply noise reduction to the entire one hour file. Brief testing seems to show that adaptive noise reduction is my best choice. I am using the "light" setting and I am keeping a very slight amount of noise remaining in the quieter backgrounds. I welcome your suggestions he is the adaptive one best for the task? 2) There is a five second beat that occurs within every minute throughout the entire file (every 50 seconds). I would like to replace part of this beat from a "good" section by copying it, and then pasting it over the existing beats throughout the entire song. This will mean multiple duplicating 60 times and pasting over the same existing sections with the quieter beat. I would also need an auto crossfade applied at both sides of the clip for each of the sixty clips. How would I go about this? 3) Finally, there is a beat every second that occurs throughout the entire song. In between the beats, there is one second of background silence/ noise. I have been thinking of applying gain reduction with crossfade to each of the background second sections, but this would mean another setting up of an action on one section, and then applying that every other second over the entire hour. That's a lot of gain reduction! Chances are, I will probably just stick with the adaptive reduction as indicated above, but I'm wondering if what I want to do here is possible as well? Thanks in advance for any help. There is so much about Audition that I find it tough to narrow down specifics especially regarding what I am seeking. I'm currently working with the Audition trial and have 5 days left as Audacity, which I normally use, just isn't up to the task and also freezes/ crashes frequently. I know you or some of the others probably tackle the above on a regular basis, but I don't. Jon |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/23/2019 2:55 PM, JBI wrote:
The background hiss varies throughout the file since the radio carrier wave became stronger and also faded at times. "Adaptive" noise reduction seems appropriate. The trick is to apply it gently as you have, and then repeat until you've reduced the hiss to a tolerable level or distorted the program material to an intolerable level. You can't have one without the other. 2)Â* There is a five second beat that occurs within every minute throughout the entire file (every 50 seconds). By "beat" do you mean a tone? If you can find a sharp enough notch filter, you might just be able to filter it out, or get it down to a tolerable level. If you need to paste over it, be assured that just about every DAW program does an automatic crossfade at the beginning and end of a spliced-in section. You can usually adjust the crossfade time if you need to, and you might, to get the patch to be less noticeable. I can't tell you how to do that in Audition, but RTRM. Usually it's a matter of zooming in to the splice point and dragging a little "handle" at the top or bottom corner of the crossfade area to change its length and slope. 3)Â* Finally, there is a beat every second that occurs throughout the entire song.Â* In between the beats, there is one second of background silence/ noise. Hmmm . . . . this is beginning to sound like a time signal. -- For a good time, call http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:55:26 -0400, JBI wrote:
On 4/23/19 2:47 PM, Don Pearce wrote: On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:33:19 -0400, JBI wrote: On 4/23/19 1:29 PM, Don Pearce wrote: On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:27:33 -0400, JBI wrote: I have two things I need to do to an audio file and not quite sure how to do them in Audition. Thanks..... I use it, but what you can do depends largely on which version you have. They have been adding froth and deleting features. d CC 2018 OK, that's a bit of a shame. It's a post-inflation version. But who can say? What are you trying to do? d Thanks in advance. Ok here goes. Please note the file I need to edit: a one hour, one time only, recording of a live radio broadcast, so I am unable to rerecord anything. Here is what I need to do: 1) The background hiss varies throughout the file since the radio carrier wave became stronger and also faded at times. At some point, I am going to be able to replace certain very noisy sections with sections with quieter background, but I'd like to first apply noise reduction to the entire one hour file. Brief testing seems to show that adaptive noise reduction is my best choice. I am using the "light" setting and I am keeping a very slight amount of noise remaining in the quieter backgrounds. I welcome your suggestions he is the adaptive one best for the task? 2) There is a five second beat that occurs within every minute throughout the entire file (every 50 seconds). I would like to replace part of this beat from a "good" section by copying it, and then pasting it over the existing beats throughout the entire song. This will mean multiple duplicating 60 times and pasting over the same existing sections with the quieter beat. I would also need an auto crossfade applied at both sides of the clip for each of the sixty clips. How would I go about this? 3) Finally, there is a beat every second that occurs throughout the entire song. In between the beats, there is one second of background silence/ noise. I have been thinking of applying gain reduction with crossfade to each of the background second sections, but this would mean another setting up of an action on one section, and then applying that every other second over the entire hour. That's a lot of gain reduction! Chances are, I will probably just stick with the adaptive reduction as indicated above, but I'm wondering if what I want to do here is possible as well? Thanks in advance for any help. There is so much about Audition that I find it tough to narrow down specifics especially regarding what I am seeking. I'm currently working with the Audition trial and have 5 days left as Audacity, which I normally use, just isn't up to the task and also freezes/ crashes frequently. I know you or some of the others probably tackle the above on a regular basis, but I don't. Jon Fixing stuff like this is not really my area, but read what Mike has written. That looks like a pretty sensible approach. Just don't imagine you are going to get this totally clean. d |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe that you can adjust the duration of the automatic crossfades in the Setup screen.
Peace, Paul |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/23/19 4:35 PM, Mike Rivers wrote:
On 4/23/2019 2:55 PM, JBI wrote: The background hiss varies throughout the file since the radio carrier wave became stronger and also faded at times. "Adaptive" noise reduction seems appropriate. The trick is to apply it gently as you have, and then repeat until you've reduced the hiss to a tolerable level or distorted the program material to an intolerable level. You can't have one without the other. 2)Â* There is a five second beat that occurs within every minute throughout the entire file (every 50 seconds). By "beat" do you mean a tone? If you can find a sharp enough notch filter, you might just be able to filter it out, or get it down to a tolerable level. If you need to paste over it, be assured that just about every DAW program does an automatic crossfade at the beginning and end of a spliced-in section. You can usually adjust the crossfade time if you need to, and you might, to get the patch to be less noticeable. I can't tell you how to do that in Audition, but RTRM. Usually it's a matter of zooming in to the splice point and dragging a little "handle" at the top or bottom corner of the crossfade area to change its length and slope. 3)Â* Finally, there is a beat every second that occurs throughout the entire song.Â* In between the beats, there is one second of background silence/ noise. Hmmm . . . . this is beginning to sound like a time signal. LOL yeah, you got it. What happened was that I got a really good one hour capture, but you know how the time is announced at the end of every minute. Well, I wanted two hours of clear capture. The first hour was actually remarkable. None of the SDR stations I used were actually close enough for consistent signals, so I've had to depend on propagation conditions and then got lucky. Their SDR's are user limited, so I just couldn't start recording and let it go or I would be cut off unexpectedly. So that meant, unless I wanted to spend days getting another lucky day, I wondered how difficult it would be to take a sample of the next hour and then combine it with the minutes of the good sample I have. I think this will be possible; it's just to take a lot of time for 60 changes. I had hoped to take the overdub, which would be the same for every minute.... "At the tone, 16 hours...", and then put the same spacing between each sample over the hour. I guess I'll just duplicate it and then carefully move each sample into position. The good news is that the time stations already have their ticks, making alignment easy. I just have to do it 60 times. Just for fun, I've come across another time station out of China called BPM. It's a lot tougher finding any close SDR's, but again got lucky. The good news is that there are no announcements per minute, only on the hour, but I still had to string together a minute of perfect 125 Hz sub tones, and I had to obtain these from several captured samples. I did manage to do that all in Audacity and saved frequently just in case the program froze. Thanks for your help. I guess I'll fire up Audition and get this done before my trial expires. |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/24/19 9:18 AM, JBI wrote:
On 4/23/19 4:35 PM, Mike Rivers wrote: On 4/23/2019 2:55 PM, JBI wrote: The background hiss varies throughout the file since the radio carrier wave became stronger and also faded at times. "Adaptive" noise reduction seems appropriate. The trick is to apply it gently as you have, and then repeat until you've reduced the hiss to a tolerable level or distorted the program material to an intolerable level. You can't have one without the other. 2)Â* There is a five second beat that occurs within every minute throughout the entire file (every 50 seconds). By "beat" do you mean a tone? If you can find a sharp enough notch filter, you might just be able to filter it out, or get it down to a tolerable level. If you need to paste over it, be assured that just about every DAW program does an automatic crossfade at the beginning and end of a spliced-in section. You can usually adjust the crossfade time if you need to, and you might, to get the patch to be less noticeable. I can't tell you how to do that in Audition, but RTRM. Usually it's a matter of zooming in to the splice point and dragging a little "handle" at the top or bottom corner of the crossfade area to change its length and slope. 3)Â* Finally, there is a beat every second that occurs throughout the entire song.Â* In between the beats, there is one second of background silence/ noise. Hmmm . . . . this is beginning to sound like a time signal. LOL yeah, you got it.Â* What happened was that I got a really good one hour capture, but you know how the time is announced at the end of every minute.Â* Well, I wanted two hours of clear capture.Â* The first hour was actually remarkable.Â* None of the SDR stations I used were actually close enough for consistent signals, so I've had to depend on propagation conditions and then got lucky.Â* Their SDR's are user limited, so I just couldn't start recording and let it go or I would be cut off unexpectedly. So that meant, unless I wanted to spend days getting another lucky day, I wondered how difficult it would be to take a sample of the next hour and then combine it with the minutes of the good sample I have.Â* I think this will be possible; it's just to take a lot of time for 60 changes. I had hoped to take the overdub, which would be the same for every minute.... "At the tone, 16 hours...", and then put the same spacing between each sample over the hour.Â* I guess I'll just duplicate it and then carefully move each sample into position.Â* The good news is that the time stations already have their ticks, making alignment easy.Â* I just have to do it 60 times. Just for fun, I've come across another time station out of China called BPM.Â* It's a lot tougher finding any close SDR's, but again got lucky. The good news is that there are no announcements per minute, only on the hour, but I still had to string together a minute of perfect 125 Hz sub tones, and I had to obtain these from several captured samples.Â* I did manage to do that all in Audacity and saved frequently just in case the program froze. Thanks for your help.Â* I guess I'll fire up Audition and get this done before my trial expires. Also, just wanted to add, that I've never been all that impressed with software noise reduction. I've only ever used it sparingly over the years, but, more often that not, I've taken near noise free harmonics from one part of a song, and then mixed them over another part that was more noisy. That can sometimes be tough and impossible; then I'll turn to NR but prefer not to use it. One thing that has helped is that the NR algorithms have improved over the years. I see that Audition's NR is a lot better than Audacity's, for example, so the latter is what I'll be using this time. Of course, that may not be fair as I have never tried the complete plug-ins available for Audacity so there may be better NR out there somewhere. |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Of course, that may not be fair as I have never tried
the complete plug-ins available for Audacity so there may be better NR out there somewhere. try a spectral editing tool. Audacity has one. but you will have to make all the fixes by hand. m |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/24/2019 1:01 PM, Don Pearce wrote:
The NR is pretty good, but really, don't try for too much. You get a choice between a slightly hissy background, and a really horrible "tin can" effect. He's working with a recording of a short wave radio transmission of a time signal. The "tin can" effect is baked in already. ![]() -- For a good time, call http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/04/2019 1:24 AM, JBI wrote:
On 4/24/19 9:18 AM, JBI wrote: On 4/23/19 4:35 PM, Mike Rivers wrote: On 4/23/2019 2:55 PM, JBI wrote: The background hiss varies throughout the file since the radio carrier wave became stronger and also faded at times. "Adaptive" noise reduction seems appropriate. The trick is to apply it gently as you have, and then repeat until you've reduced the hiss to a tolerable level or distorted the program material to an intolerable level. You can't have one without the other. 2)Â* There is a five second beat that occurs within every minute throughout the entire file (every 50 seconds). By "beat" do you mean a tone? If you can find a sharp enough notch filter, you might just be able to filter it out, or get it down to a tolerable level. If you need to paste over it, be assured that just about every DAW program does an automatic crossfade at the beginning and end of a spliced-in section. You can usually adjust the crossfade time if you need to, and you might, to get the patch to be less noticeable. I can't tell you how to do that in Audition, but RTRM. Usually it's a matter of zooming in to the splice point and dragging a little "handle" at the top or bottom corner of the crossfade area to change its length and slope. 3)Â* Finally, there is a beat every second that occurs throughout the entire song.Â* In between the beats, there is one second of background silence/ noise. Hmmm . . . . this is beginning to sound like a time signal. LOL yeah, you got it.Â* What happened was that I got a really good one hour capture, but you know how the time is announced at the end of every minute.Â* Well, I wanted two hours of clear capture.Â* The first hour was actually remarkable.Â* None of the SDR stations I used were actually close enough for consistent signals, so I've had to depend on propagation conditions and then got lucky.Â* Their SDR's are user limited, so I just couldn't start recording and let it go or I would be cut off unexpectedly. So that meant, unless I wanted to spend days getting another lucky day, I wondered how difficult it would be to take a sample of the next hour and then combine it with the minutes of the good sample I have. I think this will be possible; it's just to take a lot of time for 60 changes. I had hoped to take the overdub, which would be the same for every minute.... "At the tone, 16 hours...", and then put the same spacing between each sample over the hour.Â* I guess I'll just duplicate it and then carefully move each sample into position.Â* The good news is that the time stations already have their ticks, making alignment easy.Â* I just have to do it 60 times. Just for fun, I've come across another time station out of China called BPM.Â* It's a lot tougher finding any close SDR's, but again got lucky. The good news is that there are no announcements per minute, only on the hour, but I still had to string together a minute of perfect 125 Hz sub tones, and I had to obtain these from several captured samples.Â* I did manage to do that all in Audacity and saved frequently just in case the program froze. Thanks for your help.Â* I guess I'll fire up Audition and get this done before my trial expires. Also, just wanted to add, that I've never been all that impressed with software noise reduction.Â* I've only ever used it sparingly over the years, but, more often that not, I've taken near noise free harmonics from one part of a song, and then mixed them over another part that was more noisy.Â* That can sometimes be tough and impossible; then I'll turn to NR but prefer not to use it.Â* One thing that has helped is that the NR algorithms have improved over the years.Â* I see that Audition's NR is a lot better than Audacity's, for example, so the latter is what I'll be using this time.Â* Of course, that may not be fair as I have never tried the complete plug-ins available for Audacity so there may be better NR out there somewhere. Dunno about the others, but is a steady uniform background noise, in SoundForge with it's NR2 (and prior) modules, you take a 'noise-print' from an otherwise blank area, and it applies that in an inverse way to the wanted signal (gross over-simplification there of course). geoff |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() 3)Â* Finally, there is a beat every second that occurs throughout the entire song.Â* In between the beats, there is one second of background silence/ noise. Hmmm . . . . this is beginning to sound like a time signal. OP if this is a time signal station it's not a "song". And you do have as many opportunities as you want to re-record this. m |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Adobe Audition 2.0 | Pro Audio | |||
Adobe Audition 2.0 | Pro Audio | |||
adobe audition | Pro Audio | |||
adobe audition | Pro Audio | |||
Help with Adobe Audition | Pro Audio |