[Les Cargill[_4_]]

nickbatz wrote:
Don, if you read my last post in response to Scott, you'll probably
understand my lack of understanding.

I don't really know how else to phrase the question: what is the
argument for storing audio files post-converter at anything over
44.1/48 if the filtering is being done way above the audible spectrum
anyway?


Some plugins work better at higher SR. Higher SR may make lower round
trip latency possible. It may emerge that for significant recordings,
future generations will find a use for the additional bandwidth.

The last bit seems unlikely but you never know.

--
Les Cargill