Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/10/2018 5:43 AM, Tobiah wrote:
I'm not close to the industry, but my brother is a composer.Â* Last I knew he favored Finale.Â* I had the impression Finale was the standard. Perhaps things have changed. I was googling around to see whether there was any engraving work, and the ads that specified mandated experience with Sibelius.Â* The buzz has always been getting going with Sibelius is quicker, while there are simply things you're not going to be able to do unless you have Finale. I'm a Finale guy ever since it was shipped on a single floppy disk. Certain core aspects of it haven't changed since then.Â* Only about a year ago they claimed to have re-written everything in an object-oriented style, but the interface hasn't changed much. Once in while I download a Sibelius demo and don't get far enough to make a fair comparison. I'm just wondering if the industry is making the change to Sibelius and whether that's driven by accessibility or capability. Tobiah A local university jazz school here favours, I believe, Siblius. geoff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Finale.2008, Reason.v4.0.HYBRID, Sibelius.v5.0.HYBRID, VSL VIENNA SYMPHONIC LIBRARY, INSTRUMENTS I, II, | Pro Audio | |||
Finale vrs Sibelius | Pro Audio | |||
Sibelius Annoyance | Pro Audio | |||
Sibelius latency | Pro Audio | |||
Sibelius Opinions | Pro Audio |