Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28/09/2018 7:20 PM, Trevor wrote:
On 26/09/2018 8:58 pm, geoff wrote: On 26/09/2018 10:17 PM, wrote: The difference between a waveform and envelope depends on the level of magnification/how much zoomed in. No it doesn't. Those factors only relate to what you are looking at ini what detail. Flat envelope does NOT equate to clipping AT ALL. Doesn't HAVE to of course, but OFTEN does in the pop world these days. You get maximum noise using huge amounts of compression *AND* large amounts of clipping. R.A.P. is the only place where folks nit-pick about that distinction.Â* I can use either term waveform or envelope on any forum and most participants get what I mean. In which case they are as ignorant as you. Sadly most often the case. And people like you still condone clipping and peak limiting anyway, so I'm just talking to the walls around here. FWIW I loathe over-compression, and clipping is a totally no-no. And peak-limiting is something totally different again. Actually peak limiting is just another type of compression. Even clipping is just compression with a small attack value and close to infinite compression value. Don't confuse him (even) more. geoff |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Audio software for de-clipping overdriven sound / clipping restauration? | Pro Audio | |||
Audio software for de-clipping overdriven sound / clipping restauration? | Pro Audio | |||
Audio software for de-clipping overdriven sound / clipping restauration? | Pro Audio | |||
Audio software for de-clipping overdriven sound / clipping restauration? | Pro Audio | |||
tweeter damage? | Tech |