Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , polymod wrote:
"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message news ![]() snippage The SM-57 and SM-58 have the same capsule inside, but sound totally different. I find the SM-58 dull because of the foam ball, but the SM-57 is a remarkably useful mike. Scott, I know this has been discussed in length, but in your opinion would taking the foam out of a 58 make it a 57 (outside of the physical design)? You have to remove the metal grille too, but yes, if you do this it sounds pretty much like an SM-57. However, with the grille removed it's very delicate and easy to break. Still, when the rental company gives you a box of SM-58s and you need a mike for a guitar cabinet, it's a good plan. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message news ![]() In article , polymod wrote: "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message news ![]() snippage The SM-57 and SM-58 have the same capsule inside, but sound totally different. I find the SM-58 dull because of the foam ball, but the SM-57 is a remarkably useful mike. Scott, I know this has been discussed in length, but in your opinion would taking the foam out of a 58 make it a 57 (outside of the physical design)? You have to remove the metal grille too, but yes, if you do this it sounds pretty much like an SM-57. However, with the grille removed it's very delicate and easy to break. Still, when the rental company gives you a box of SM-58s and you need a mike for a guitar cabinet, it's a good plan. Thanks Scott. Poly --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Shure 556S Mics | Pro Audio | |||
4 mics compared, Schoeps, Shure, and CAD | Pro Audio | |||
Shure MX393 Tabletop Mics | Pro Audio | |||
Older Shure mics | Pro Audio | |||
Shure Wireless Mics | Pro Audio |