Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Bromo
 
Posts: n/a
Default tweaks and proof

It is all in the digital receiver - and the amount of allowable timing
errors before it turns into audible errors. The higher the "oversampling"
or "sampling" rate, the better the clock recovery has to be - and the less
room for error.

In a digitized telephone network the allowable timing errors and dispersion
allowed is helped with the limited bandwidth, and the recovery circuits are
quite good.

On 6/20/04 10:30 AM, in article , "Chelvam"
wrote:

IF you got through other posts here, especailly the one on Vintage DAC-
jitter is a higher in separate DAC.

___
"Rich.Andrews" wrote in message
newsa7Bc.72457$eu.43358@attbi_s02...


How is jitter reintroduced with a short cable yet digitized telephone
signals travel over miles of copper without impact?

IOW, that site could be deconstructed quite easily, but isn't worth the
time, bandwidth, nor the effort.

r

--
Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes.



 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:02 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"